That’s a cute house! That also tells me she was planning to divorce the whole time. That’s why he unretired. |
Because… she found out he un-retired the same day he announced it? Also as someone currently buying a house close to mine for my mom I don’t know what kind of smoking gun this is… |
... She's not going to live there. It has 3 bedrooms. The mansion they were building has 5 and a private security force on the island. Its probably for her housekeeper or sister/mom to stay in during visits. |
Are you guys legit thinking Gisele is moving into a sub 2k sq ft house with her kids? Lol. It’s for her nanny I’m sure. |
I think it’s for legal reasons like she’s hiding assets and poor her, she’s just a simple girl, a roof over her head and her family. |
This makes no sense since (1) she is definitely not going to live there, this is a woman used to living in very luxurious homes and I don't get the sense she's trying to downsize, and (2) Gisele's income is incredibly public, as is Tom's, and the idea that either of them would be able to successfully convince a court or arbitrator that one of them is destitute is comical. They'd be laughed out of the room. They may indeed duke it out around division of assets, but trust me, Gisele is not hiding assets behind a little 3 bedroom house in the burbs. |
|
I am with Gisele. She cares for her family. |
It's so wonderful watching his far-well tour turn into a nightmare season. |
No way in hell she is living here. Not a secure dwelling and no privacy. The neighbors' homes are 10 feet away from the bedroom windows. Anyone can walk up to the front door or hop the back fence. This is definitely for an assistant, au pair, or relative. Weird that the DM even posted this - feels very vindictive. |
It’s a bad take because he won’t spend any more time with the kids. Just because a court would give him 50% doesn’t mean he’ll take it. Before we split, our marriage counselor told me that my husband wasn’t going to spend more time with the kids once he no longer lived under the same roof, and she was 100% correct. Chronically absent fathers don’t become more present after a split. That’s fantasy. |
NP. Obviously the other woman (or man) isn’t responsible for someone else’s relationship, but they have just as little respect for the sanctity of the institution of marriage as the cheater does. They also don’t have good character or morals. |
+1 absolutely |
Rich people never take their marriage vows seriously. |
I agree. I’ve never thought she was pretty. Saw Tom in person in Tampa….he’s hot. |