Mandatory vaccines for teachers/staff and eligible students

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now the entire state of California is requiring state workers to be vaccinated or be tested regularly. Just announced.

This is going to snowball

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does everyone keep saying things about vaccinations that they think might be true (but are not)?

Like that vaccines can't be mandated or that we can't get information about vaccination rates or even whether vaccines reduce transmission.

All of this information is out there. Who is spreading all of this misinformation?

WTU blocked DCPS’s efforts to get data on teacher vaccination rates.

Yes, bc dcps violated their bargaining agreements

WTU is interefering with data collection on vaccination; meanwhile totally silent on mandatory vaccination. What are we supposed to conclude?

If part of your contract said that you had a day in creating health policy at your office, and then your boss did it without you, would you ask them to pause and engage with you, as your contract states? That’s accountability not interference

Is collecting data "creating health policy"? I would think that the data would inform what policies to adopt, but in itself is not policy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does everyone keep saying things about vaccinations that they think might be true (but are not)?

Like that vaccines can't be mandated or that we can't get information about vaccination rates or even whether vaccines reduce transmission.

All of this information is out there. Who is spreading all of this misinformation?

WTU blocked DCPS’s efforts to get data on teacher vaccination rates.

Yes, bc dcps violated their bargaining agreements

WTU is interefering with data collection on vaccination; meanwhile totally silent on mandatory vaccination. What are we supposed to conclude?

If part of your contract said that you had a day in creating health policy at your office, and then your boss did it without you, would you ask them to pause and engage with you, as your contract states? That’s accountability not interference

Is collecting data "creating health policy"? I would think that the data would inform what policies to adopt, but in itself is not policy.

If you managed a team at your workplace, and had a contract with your supervisors that they had to go through you before collecting any sort of health data, and then ignored that contract and asked without telling you. Is that a better analogy?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does everyone keep saying things about vaccinations that they think might be true (but are not)?

Like that vaccines can't be mandated or that we can't get information about vaccination rates or even whether vaccines reduce transmission.

All of this information is out there. Who is spreading all of this misinformation?

WTU blocked DCPS’s efforts to get data on teacher vaccination rates.

Yes, bc dcps violated their bargaining agreements

WTU is interefering with data collection on vaccination; meanwhile totally silent on mandatory vaccination. What are we supposed to conclude?

If part of your contract said that you had a day in creating health policy at your office, and then your boss did it without you, would you ask them to pause and engage with you, as your contract states? That’s accountability not interference

Is collecting data "creating health policy"? I would think that the data would inform what policies to adopt, but in itself is not policy.

If you managed a team at your workplace, and had a contract with your supervisors that they had to go through you before collecting any sort of health data, and then ignored that contract and asked without telling you. Is that a better analogy?

if your actual goal was to prevent covid transmission in school, would you do anything to get in the way of data collection?

[Anonymous]

I work for DC gov't and I want it to be mandatory for all municipal employees.

[Anonymous]

DC will make it mandatory, the dominoes are falling.

Vax or test. Done.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I work for DC gov't and I want it to be mandatory for all municipal employees.

Hell, if the federal government made it mandatory I’d bet you’d catch a lot of people that haven’t vaxxed yet. If only bc a third of people employed in DC are employed by the federal government.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does everyone keep saying things about vaccinations that they think might be true (but are not)?

Like that vaccines can't be mandated or that we can't get information about vaccination rates or even whether vaccines reduce transmission.

All of this information is out there. Who is spreading all of this misinformation?

WTU blocked DCPS’s efforts to get data on teacher vaccination rates.

Yes, bc dcps violated their bargaining agreements

WTU is interefering with data collection on vaccination; meanwhile totally silent on mandatory vaccination. What are we supposed to conclude?

If part of your contract said that you had a day in creating health policy at your office, and then your boss did it without you, would you ask them to pause and engage with you, as your contract states? That’s accountability not interference

Is collecting data "creating health policy"? I would think that the data would inform what policies to adopt, but in itself is not policy.

If you managed a team at your workplace, and had a contract with your supervisors that they had to go through you before collecting any sort of health data, and then ignored that contract and asked without telling you. Is that a better analogy?

if your actual goal was to prevent covid transmission in school, would you do anything to get in the way of data collection?

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does everyone keep saying things about vaccinations that they think might be true (but are not)?

Like that vaccines can't be mandated or that we can't get information about vaccination rates or even whether vaccines reduce transmission.

All of this information is out there. Who is spreading all of this misinformation?

WTU blocked DCPS’s efforts to get data on teacher vaccination rates.

Yes, bc dcps violated their bargaining agreements

WTU is interefering with data collection on vaccination; meanwhile totally silent on mandatory vaccination. What are we supposed to conclude?

If part of your contract said that you had a day in creating health policy at your office, and then your boss did it without you, would you ask them to pause and engage with you, as your contract states? That’s accountability not interference

Is collecting data "creating health policy"? I would think that the data would inform what policies to adopt, but in itself is not policy.

If you managed a team at your workplace, and had a contract with your supervisors that they had to go through you before collecting any sort of health data, and then ignored that contract and asked without telling you. Is that a better analogy?

if your actual goal was to prevent covid transmission in school, would you do anything to get in the way of data collection?

+1

+2. Nailed it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:From the Times:

By Emma Fitzsimmons
July 26, 2021, 9:22 a.m. ET

New York City will require all municipal workers to be vaccinated against the coronavirus by the time schools reopen in mid-September or face weekly testing, Mayor Bill de Blasio plans to announce on Monday morning, according to a city official.

Last week, Mr. de Blasio’s decision announced a similar mandate for public health care workers — part of an effort to speed up vaccinations as the city faces a third wave of coronavirus cases driven by the spread of the Delta variant.

The new requirement would apply to roughly 340,000 city workers, including teachers and police officers. The Sept. 13 deadline, when about a million students are set to return to classrooms, shows the importance of the reopening of schools for the city’s recovery and for Mr. de Blasio’s legacy

de Blasio has really been a standard bearer for reopening schools. He deserves a ton of credit.

DeBlasio is only a standard-bearer in comparison to someone as incompetent as Bowser

[Anonymous]

The bigger issue is testing all the students. It makes no sense to test staff and not students.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does everyone keep saying things about vaccinations that they think might be true (but are not)?

Like that vaccines can't be mandated or that we can't get information about vaccination rates or even whether vaccines reduce transmission.

All of this information is out there. Who is spreading all of this misinformation?

WTU blocked DCPS’s efforts to get data on teacher vaccination rates.

Yes, bc dcps violated their bargaining agreements

WTU is interefering with data collection on vaccination; meanwhile totally silent on mandatory vaccination. What are we supposed to conclude?

If part of your contract said that you had a day in creating health policy at your office, and then your boss did it without you, would you ask them to pause and engage with you, as your contract states? That’s accountability not interference

This is the worst analogy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does everyone keep saying things about vaccinations that they think might be true (but are not)?

Like that vaccines can't be mandated or that we can't get information about vaccination rates or even whether vaccines reduce transmission.

All of this information is out there. Who is spreading all of this misinformation?

WTU blocked DCPS’s efforts to get data on teacher vaccination rates.

Yes, bc dcps violated their bargaining agreements

WTU is interefering with data collection on vaccination; meanwhile totally silent on mandatory vaccination. What are we supposed to conclude?

If part of your contract said that you had a day in creating health policy at your office, and then your boss did it without you, would you ask them to pause and engage with you, as your contract states? That’s accountability not interference

Is collecting data "creating health policy"? I would think that the data would inform what policies to adopt, but in itself is not policy.

If you managed a team at your workplace, and had a contract with your supervisors that they had to go through you before collecting any sort of health data, and then ignored that contract and asked without telling you. Is that a better analogy?

Oh no. I was wrong. This is worse.

[Anonymous]

I would like the WTU defender to come here and answer the question directly. Is WTU in favor of mandatory vaccination, or not?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I would like the WTU defender to come here and answer the question directly. Is WTU in favor of mandatory vaccination, or not?

I'm not the president of the WTU, but everything that they put out online makes me think that they are