NP. No, institutional racism is not “on” a Black woman. “Blacks,” really? You’re a problem. |
|
I think the best use of all these clubs is if you don’t want to meet people. If you just want to go there and take people there, they can be really handy and comfortable. The staff tends to be really great and caring compared to a restaurant.
Probably the exception is the university club if you want to play a sport there. |
| Ned’s is worth it if you need to take people to nice dinner a lot. The view from the founder’s room is great. I can certainly see the appeal: smooth logistics and it feels a little special/fun/different for guests. |
Great views, but MAGA vibe. Hard pass. |
| My dad was in the Metropolitan Club. Lots of Metropolitan Club ties show up on TV news. |
It’s a mix. I think it will change when the admin changes. I mean, they control the whole Republican party. They’re among us. |
Least favorite and tackiest club in the city. |
It's not diverse and the average age must be 84. The House at 1229 is a much nicer club for women and it's diverse. It's also more beautiful inside. |
Is Met even trying to court people below 65? |
The Met Club has a multi year waiting list largely populated by 30 and 40 something young professionals. |
I would never want to be a member of a club that counts scumbags like Kash Patel as a member. |
DP. Disagree. You clearly do not know what you are speaking about. No one talks about the high level people that are frequently at the UC. That is the charm of the place. We go there frequently and have been surprised to see how many high level people in business and government frequent that place. UC members are very low key and leave them alone so they like going there. You are obviously not in the know. I can think of 5 vip types I have seen there just in the past week. |
It is quite beautiful. I would say Cosmos and Ned's are by far the most beautiful inside. |