spanx pee hole

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Serious question — why not consider wearing non-clingy clothing in a sturdier fabric?

If someone has picked out a flimsy bridesmaid dress for you that you simply must wear, sure. But for the rest of these girdle-necessary occasions, wouldn't it be easier to Just Say No at the point of purchase? Like when you're looking at your gut rolls and dimpled butt in the 3-way mirror at the store before you even buy the overly body-conscious clinging item?

That's what I do. Just skip the jersey fabric. Or go up a size.


Agree. Maybe buy clothes that fit?

Hi, hello. I’m a fat woman. There are no clothes that don’t in some way reveal my odd shaped gut, and believe me, I’m not one for vanity sizing. If I want to look smooth and not lumpen, spanx is it.
Anonymous
I'm not overweight but I'm not super thin either- size 4-6. I hate spanx and think they make me look worse. They flatten my bottom and pinch in my waist at the sides which squeezes my normally board flat stomach into a cylinder so it doesn't look very flat if looking from a side view, more round. I prefer my natural curves and the pee hole...i asssumes it was for peeing but I have never successfully navigated it.

I go nude under formal gowns since I buy dresses in thick lined fabric. I wear silk slips under jersey or cotton day dresses. So much more comfortable
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I'm not overweight but I'm not super thin either- size 4-6. I hate spanx and think they make me look worse. They flatten my bottom and pinch in my waist at the sides which squeezes my normally board flat stomach into a cylinder so it doesn't look very flat if looking from a side view, more round. I prefer my natural curves and the pee hole...i asssumes it was for peeing but I have never successfully navigated it.

I go nude under formal gowns since I buy dresses in thick lined fabric. I wear silk slips under jersey or cotton day dresses. So much more comfortable




Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Wearing spanx isn't about wearing clothes that are too clingy or a size too small. It's basically doing what a bra does for women with small breasts: keeping things properly positioned and minimizing bounce. True girdles are analogous to an underwire bra for a woman with 34G breasts. Spanx are like the wire-free lounging bras.

Most women would look so much better if they wore the proper foundations under their clothing. They can take the place of a slip, which very few women bother with anymore. Your clothing rests along your body better if there is something between the fabric and your skin. I wish more people could see their butts from behind when they go out of the house all free-form in a dress or skirt. I'm sure that people would make different fashion choices as a result. And wearing them doesn't mean you're fat. Only a drag queen with a male butt wouldn't benefit from them. It just means you have a woman's body with normal fat deposits in the right places. They sell them in XS for a reason.


I think the last time I came across this term was the bra-shopping scene in "Are You There, God? It's Me, Margaret"
Anonymous
I am dying right now....somehow read the thread backwards starting on the last page and ending near the person who thought it was a penis hole. I am on an all day train ride. The stranger next to me is reading the Bible, and I am immersed in this perfect trash, with my screen brightness turned way down. Thank you, DCUM.
Anonymous
Small purse-sized funnel?
Lol
Anonymous
If the "cooter" part of the Spanx is open with an access panel for godknowswhat... and everything else is pressurized and sucked in, on the periphery and at any weak areas (pee hole) - I mean I'm not an engineer but wouldn't that cause a really fetching camel toe? Wouldn't everything you had there just bulge up and out?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If the "cooter" part of the Spanx is open with an access panel for godknowswhat... and everything else is pressurized and sucked in, on the periphery and at any weak areas (pee hole) - I mean I'm not an engineer but wouldn't that cause a really fetching camel toe? Wouldn't everything you had there just bulge up and out?


I think most people wear dresses with their spanx but anyway it wouldn't be camel toe because there's no central seam. It would be more like...










wh0re's hoof.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If the "cooter" part of the Spanx is open with an access panel for godknowswhat... and everything else is pressurized and sucked in, on the periphery and at any weak areas (pee hole) - I mean I'm not an engineer but wouldn't that cause a really fetching camel toe? Wouldn't everything you had there just bulge up and out?


I think most people wear dresses with their spanx but anyway it wouldn't be camel toe because there's no central seam. It would be more like...










wh0re's hoof.


LOL

I'm calling it. This thread is now an official DCUM classic.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They aren’t for peeing, they are for sex. Duh.


No, they make them so girls can pee standing up. My son's friends who used to go to Coachella said it was disgusting because girls were so into being able to take a whiz like men they were doing it all over the place, not looking for a tree.


WTF? Impossible to pee standing up with these. Plus, hot young things at Coachella are wearing crop tops/bikinis/short shorts, etc. not nude colored middle aged woman shapewear that goes from knee to underboob.

This is fake news.


No, I meant the plastic things for girls to use to pee standing up (I must have misunderstoof the pp when I replied)
-I had suggested them to go along with the spanx, this was followed by "They aren't for peeing, they are for sex", which I thought was referring to the plastic thingies (Go Girl is I guess what they are called), which is what girls at Coachella were using disgustingly
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They aren’t for peeing, they are for sex. Duh.


Really?


Hmmm......I’m not finding having sex in a spanx appealing for anyone.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Serious question — why not consider wearing non-clingy clothing in a sturdier fabric?

If someone has picked out a flimsy bridesmaid dress for you that you simply must wear, sure. But for the rest of these girdle-necessary occasions, wouldn't it be easier to Just Say No at the point of purchase? Like when you're looking at your gut rolls and dimpled butt in the 3-way mirror at the store before you even buy the overly body-conscious clinging item?

That's what I do. Just skip the jersey fabric. Or go up a size.


Agree. Maybe buy clothes that fit?

Hi, hello. I’m a fat woman. There are no clothes that don’t in some way reveal my odd shaped gut, and believe me, I’m not one for vanity sizing. If I want to look smooth and not lumpen, spanx is it.


Plus 1
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I'm not overweight but I'm not super thin either- size 4-6. I hate spanx and think they make me look worse. They flatten my bottom and pinch in my waist at the sides which squeezes my normally board flat stomach into a cylinder so it doesn't look very flat if looking from a side view, more round. I prefer my natural curves and the pee hole...i asssumes it was for peeing but I have never successfully navigated it.

I go nude under formal gowns since I buy dresses in thick lined fabric. I wear silk slips under jersey or cotton day dresses. So much more comfortable


Then why even post on this thread?

I am not overweight either, very fit actually. But I have stretched out skin on my mid section that kind of hangs and for some, garments like these are actually MORE comfortable bc the loose jiggle feeling is very uncomfy.
Anonymous
As a guy, this is HILARIOUS!!!!

Thank you
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:They aren’t for peeing, they are for sex. Duh.


Really?


Hmmm......I’m not finding having sex in a spanx appealing for anyone.


Granted only in Spanx tights but I think both parties will agree it was appealing.
post reply Forum Index » Beauty and Fashion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: