|
My point is people need to think about why you think it is uncomfortable being in the 1%? Skin color or income are two variable of many that make up a person. We share more with people than those two variables. Are those the two variables you focus on when you make friends? Or others? Do you only prefer to hang out with people in your race and income? I like people with shared interests. I was also the only woman and one of few Americans in my graduate program. I guess that’s why I didn’t worry about the demographic of my kid’s new DCPS school. Again, one is only an outlier in those two categories...two categories out of many. it I'm not saying it is the only relevant thing to consider when picking a school or looking at a relationship, but it is still a relevant factor no matter where you rank it on your list of priorities. Being the only one or a handful of the only ones of anything makes everyone uncomfortable to some extent. For example, if I was offered a position at a company where I was the employee who has kids, then I am would know going in that I am an outlier and would be concerned about work culture and the ability to support working moms. Does that mean it is a bad company or that I wouldn't take a job there or even that I would have a negative, unsupportive experience? No. But it would certainly be something I would consider and want to explore when deciding to take a job or not. To pretend our ethnic, economic, gender, sexual orientation, and other backgrounds don't matter or are irrelevant to everyday experience and ability to connect with others wreaks of -- guess what? White-washed privilege. I don't think you would find a minority on the street who would claim that. It is more than appropriate to consider that fact when evaluating education options to find an environment where your child will thrive. That may be a school where your kid is an extreme minority or it may not, but it isn't an irrelevant factor either way. I also think it is very different if you have grown up being in the minority most of your life - for example, I grew up in the South where there are two predominant races, so anyone of a different background is almost always going to be the extreme minority. In that instance, you often don't have much of a choice either way (also something I brought up previously) or it is also an aspect of your everyday lived experience. A kid that isn't used to that might have a more difficult time transitioning versus a kid that is. That would also need to be a factor to consider - what has your child's experience been up until that point? My child will likely grow up in a school system where he is the minority, but not an extreme minority. He might handle going to a school where he is in the 1% better than a kid who didn't grow up that way, but it is too early to tell. |
|
|
Brookland and Dunbar didn’t attract any white kids. UMC families see right through the shiny new buildings. Banneker is a good achool but compared to other selective si urban schools it’s really quite average. |
| OP here - I appreciate everyone's comments, but I just really want to know how the work at Banneker compares with the work at Wilson and which will provide a great challenge to my high achieving child. |
|
OP - is your kid a STEM kid? I read these comments as Wilson is better for STEM. If humanities, maybe Banneker is better. What kind of learning environment does your DC thrive in, Banneker sounds more intense, at least in 9th grade.
Is your kid at Deal now? My high achieving 8th grader would rather poke her eyes out than go to another IB school. Buried amongst these arguments about race and education is information about the schools. |
High-achieving from what kind of school? How strong was your child's cohort? |
|
Banneker is more intense: you must maintain a certain GPA to stay ay the school. Kids are serious and brag/complain about how much work they do (like SWW and BASIS in this regard).
Cell phones are locked up for the day the minute you step in the building. There are some sports but not that many. Right now the student body is majority female. There are more APs offered at Wilson although at Banneker you can choose to instead or in addition pursue an IB diploma, which many people think is more rigorous and better prep for college. |
with respect to IB: why? |
I'm not sure I buy it, but there is definitely more writing required, capstone projects, and the standards for the diploma are the same in the US and other countries. Its proponents say that in contrast to AP courses, you must demonstrate more critical thinking. Many students seeking an IB diploma also take AP exams (not the classes) and can pass them without much trouble. Anyway, there is a lot of information out there comparing the two approaches; you can research and draw your own conclusions. |
|
The IB MYP is quite different than the IB high school diploma program. Many say the MYP is the weak link.
And Banneker is not IB for all; you can choose to take AP instead. |
You do not have to take AP classes to take the AP exams. You must take IB classes to take the IB test. |
| My understanding (based largely on one friend with a kid there, so take it with a grain of salt) is that Banneker is very into piling on the homework and tests. Academic rigor = many many assignments which may or may not be too easy, or too hard--keeping kids occupied much of the day with academic work. THis is the opposite of what would suit us or our kid, but YMMV. Wilson has less of that, more ability for the kid to choose a mix of classes, more extracurriculars. |
DP: One of mine hated IB too. It think it was all the group projects that soured him. |