Yes, two-week Concordia Village Chinese camp in MN, for ages 8+. Camp was packed with NY, NJ and Cal kids enrolled in dual immersion programs, lots of what I'll call "semi native speakers." Our YY bubble deflated after five years of being told that our child spoke very well, although we didn't supplement. Most of the other campers spoke and understood a lot better than ours, including slang/kid speak Chinese. Ours was more than competitive on writing. Child struggled in the camp, but we're proud that s/he wants to return another year. We're hosting a Chinese au pair for the first time this school year, although it's a stretch for us financially and we miss having a designated guest room in our not so big row house. |
| If you want my advice on going with YY, get out there if you can, making of point of having your student speak Chinese with native-speakers (who aren't YY teachers) on a regular basis, don't get too comfortable inside the NE campus bubble. If you can't afford a Chinese au pair, or don't have space for one, consider a weekend heritage language school in MoCo (age 4+), although the commitment is a pain. Do this mainly to interact with Chinese families who aren't as assimilated as the small YY ethnic group. Brave camps with native speaking kids if you can afford them. |
If you are comparing to kids who go to weekend immersion, then of course yours will not be as fluent in speaking because weekend school means they use the language at home. I think the spoken skills my kids are picking up are what would be expected for a non-native speaker from a non-native speaking household to demonstrate. I do agree that the benchmarks that they are supposed to achieve have been watered down, but that doesn't mean that they themselves cannot outperform those benchmarks. IF the goal is to meet benchmarks, ie get a C, yes, they are not going to be fluent. I would hope my kids are striving to get an A, or in YY's case an E. Don't want to get into how ridiculous I think the grading systems used today are, that's another thread. Going back to the original question, in light of some other more recent posts, if you are OK with the idea of the dual language, your child will still get a good education with the addition of better Chinese skills than trying to pick it up later in life. One thing I have observed is that English reading was also slowed a little in both kids. Compared to some of their peers who go to other schools, they picked up reading a little later, but once they got it, they picked it up pretty quickly and I feel like they're catching up, if not already caught up. According to school assessments, they are on track and at grade level, but like I said earlier, the goal is not to be a C student, and the standardized testing has a pretty low benchmark for what grade level should be. |
| I've been following this post as we are currently #4 on the WL for K. I'm not sure if we would even receive a call off the WL but in the event we do, I'm trying to determine if we would accept. We are currently at a HRCS that is close to our home and we absolutely love. We entered the lottery only for immersion schools for the DCI feeder. We matched with MV and are thrilled. We definitely feel that we could support Spanish at home based on our high school and college Spanish courses. Our child currently has Spanish a few times a week at the current school and is really starting to take interest in the language. We are not thrilled with MV's location however. It's still close to our home but it's in a highly congested area. YY has a more desirable location. It's consistently ranked as a top elementary school in DC which is why we ranked it as our top choice. We are still torn at the moment. |
MV expanded too quickly, not even the 2nd WL sibling got off the list at YY last year. Grow where you are planted, the grass isn't always greener. |
It may well be that the Cantonese speakers haven't been on this board in ages but you sound exactly like the "ABC" posters from a few years ago. Everything you say drips of entitlement and frankly racism. Seriously, you wouldn't have helped it "the YY board planned to hire non Chinese-speaking admins"? They hired the best and most qualified people who applied. They did not exclude anyone who was not in the "local dialect-speaking immigrant community." I have visited Chinese immersion programs across the country, exploring places where we had the opportunity to move. There are lots of places that call themselves Chinese immersion but I have not seen a single one that is on Yu Ying's level. Pray, do tell us which immersion school is "real"? I've probably visited it. You appear to think that a school is only real Chines immersion if it is Chinese preference, but Yu Ying is a public charter school, and for the billionth time, IT IS NOT ALLOWED TO PREFERENCE NATIVE SPEAKERS. This is and was always going to be true. Ten years later you can't get it through your head. Your solution, I suppose, would have been to not open Yu Ying. Better nothing, no community interested in Chinese language & culture, no new families attending Chinese cultural events throughout the area, no parents learning Chinese themselves, no influx of Chinese au pairs and teachers, no families sharing Chinese culture and language with their own networks. Better nothing than something that doesn't give someone exactly like you a preference over anyone who is different from you. Get a life. Move on. Why would you even open this thread? |
| Oh yeah, and Yu Ying voted best elementary school by City Paper yet again! |
I'm a NP and you're an arrogant ass. Something is clearly wrong with the ethnic community in a city rejects the one school celebrating its own culture and language. They must have had their reasons and the YY board and PA should have tried to sort this problem out long ago.You sound like the head case here. |
| If you have an axe to grind because you can't stand ABCs, or immersion school principals who hardly speak the language of immersion, or DC charter law, or whatever else, please start your own thread. It would be nice if people gave OP the advice she's asking for. |
| Yes, OP, YY is warm and welcoming! The PYP curriculum focuses on creating active, inquisitive learners with an emphasis on personal responsibility and connection to the community and to Earth. It sounds like you are happy where you are, but YY is another wonderful option. Good luck to you and to all who are making tough decisions! |
| +1. |
| This has been informative. How are Yu Ying students performing on the YCT tests? |
Also NP here. I think the problem is that every time someone complains that ethnic Chinese students don't get preference they are willfully ignoring charter law. There is not allowed to be a preference for language, period. If there were, it would place the poorest students in the city at an even greater disadvantage. It's a public school for students in DC first, and a Chinese immersion school second. Another factor to be aware of, is that the Chinese community in DC (such as it is) is largely Taiwanese. YY is pursuing relationships in mainland China. The characters taught are modern, not traditional. There's enough tension between the Taiwanese in DC and the Chinese Embassy that when they've made gifts to the school, they arrange to come at different times so that they don't interact. YY students have been welcome at the Chinese Cultural Center downtown, but DC Chinatown is about a block long and mostly historical. The ethnic community has long since moved to the suburbs. |
Because the school pushes YY parents to vote for the school in this meaningless poll. Most other schools don't care, so they don't inundate parents with requests to vote. |
|
The ethnic Chinese community in DC, if you want to call it that, isn't largely Taiwanese, and the entire pre 1968 community hasn't decamped to the burbs. Like other DC "gentrifiers," most of us moved to DC in our 20s and stayed. We're scattered around the city, and hail from all over the place, Singapore, Hong Kong, NYC, San Fran, LA, Toronto etc. Our ranks are growing year on year. We don't connect easily with YY families on the language learning front, because most of those we meet are either Chinese who are so assimilated that they really don't consider themselves immigrants or ABCs, or parents without much of a connection to Chinese (language, culture, populations).
As for the PP who opines that YY is the country's top public Chinese immersion school. What's the criteria? Size? Length of waiting list? There are half a dozen strong public programs in the Bay Area, several teaching Cantonese to all the littlest kids as a sharp marketing strategy. These programs do what they can to draw in dialect speakers to raise standards for Mandarin learning. They don't just do it by offering an admissions preference; they do it by offering structure and programming native speakers are looking for. We get it: DCPC, DC and Congress don't see value in offering native speakers preference in charters admissions in any language. But something's gotta give eventually because, all things being equal, dual immersion constitutes best educational practices in language instruction for poor kids (and others), and by a long shot. Maybe DCPS and DCPC will merge in a generation, with the standards boosting preference coming in as a by-product. |