They shrink? |
They expand. |
| The only way to be thin is to consume few calories relative to your exercise. If you don't exercise and want to be thin, you can, just eat smaller amounts of food. |
Yup, this is my husband. |
| The OP is either a weird troll or just significantly deranged. Starving a child is abuse. Kids generally don't eat unless they are hungry...and they are hungry for a reason...their bodies are going through periodic growth spurts. OP, did you withhold breast milk (or formula) when they were infants? |
Agreed. Also, what exactly are you feeding him? If he's complaining about being hungry, then maybe put more fat in his diet (the good kind - like avocado, nuts, olive oil, egg yolks). Fat makes people feel satisfied. Carbs make people hungry. |
Try to be witty if you disagree. |
| Ordering two meals for a kid at dinner is ridiculous. Plus if a kid is in the 95th percentile for height and the 70th for weight, that child is not being underfed. |
The advice given to her was to feed them more. So why is it okay for this mom to leave her kid hungry? OP, it's fine to have him wait about ten minutes before taking more food. But you dishing out what you think is a fair portion for a growing teen? No.. he's learning nothing. Being a little hungry between meals is okay. However, you shouldn't still be hungry when the meal is finished. More like comfortably full. Gnawing hunger? That isn't usually considered an okay thing. He may end up overeating as an adult because you've controlled so much now. |
Love this book: http://www.amazon.com/French-Children-Dont-Throw-Food/dp/0385617615 Yes, it is an American thing to snack all the times. I try to control my kids too. |
+1 |
+ ten bazillion. I think part of this trend is parents have no idea how to parent or discipline so when the kids misbehave in public they throw food at them under the guise of, "oh s/he acts up when hungry." |
|
It's okay to feel hungry and to be ready for the meal, rather than eat just because food's in front of you, but if your kids are still hungry after eating dinner, then I think you need to adjust your sense of what's normal and healthy for growing teenage boys.
Also, just a note for the posters above, which your ped can confirm for your OP - being 95th for weight would not be overweight if paired with 95th (or something in that ballpark) for height. Your son may indeed be healthy, but being 70th for for weight doesn't mean he's heavy - you have a tall kid, OP. He's also growing. Now is not the time to restrict healthy foods. Please speak to a medical professional and get some well-informed advice, so that your family's food policy can be well informed and not a misfired backlash against lax parenting trends. |
| Also, an alternative to rationing food for your teenagers would be to say that there needs to be 20 minute break between courses, to give themselves time to figure out if they really are actually hungry. Have them dismissed from the table and move on to another activity. If half and hour later, they're still hungry, then they can have seconds, or make themselves a salad. |
Not true. As someone who has battled food addiction my entire life (I remember this sense of urgency and shame around food as young 3 or 4), It is actually good for kids to experience hunger. The problem with american kids is the constant snacking, followed by large portions etc. So even if you only provide "healthy meals" at some point they will be out at a friends house, on their own, and they will not understand their own body signals. Most kids are overweight because they eat for dopamine like effect, boredom and honestly have no idea how to read/listen to their own body signals. OP does not have an eating disorder, kids are not gonna starve if they don't get three snacks at a 1 hour soccer game. |