
And you're adding to the ignorance. Boys don't need foreskin and there are long-term benefits to getting it removed. Those are the facts. If you choose not to do it because of whatever reason you come up with that's fine, but don't deny there are benefits. And i'm not even talking about the aesthetics or potential odor if not meticulously cleaned. And you tell me how many boys do any meticulous cleaning. |
They use a local and it's skin, sad that you lie |
Who cares what a boyfriend thinks anyway. Whose to say he'll even be involved in the kids life. Let him put a ring on it if he wants to make decisions about the kids. |
Why not just cut the breasts off at puberty, then no breast cancer!
Better yet, why not wear a CONDOM to prevent STDs instead of relying on biased studies done in Africa. Most men in this country are circumcised and yet we still had a HUGE AIDS epidemic. What stemmed the tide--it sure as sunshine wasn't ripping the foreskin off of a newborn! It was SAFE SEX PRACTICES.
|
|
Some babies die from it, here in the USA, every year. Even more have a little too much snipped off the end and end up with a deformed penis forever. All because their parents wanted a nice, neat penis on their son. http://www.circinfo.org/USA_deaths.html |
OP - Please don't mutilate your son like this! His foreskin is part of his body and it doesn't need to be removed. You're literally cutting away part of his genitals. |
|
Oh goody the lunatic clown parade has arrived |
I do love how all the pro-intact arguments are made with love and compassion for the child, and all the pro-circ arguments are simply insults, bad mouthing and spewing out "facts." Equality and justice will eventually end this cutting epidemic we have here in the US and when it does, all the cut boys will be DEMANDING answers. Why didn't they get a say in how much of their genitals they got to keep? THEIR genitals, not their parent's genitals, not the doctor's genitals. Theirs. We don't cut our girls, we need to wise up and stop cutting out boys. |
Love and compassion? Hardly. The pro-intact crowd is all about shaming people who make different decisions than they do. |
There are obnoxious people on both sides. I think the risk/reward to infant circumcision is pretty small both ways, but in this case we have a woman who does not want to circ her baby and is being pressured into it by her boyfriend. To me, that's a much bigger problem than either an increased sensitivity to pain or a greater likeliness of a UTI. OP, if you don't want to, DON'T. |
Have your boyfriend do more research and then if he for some reasons insists on doing this to his baby, find a doctor you're both happy with. And go to a pediatric urologist. And really, don't do it. Signed, a cut father who didn't cut his son |
My boys (now young adult men) and my dh are intact. I'm not into shaming anyone...but I am going to speak up when I see stuff thrown around that is simply not true.
Ps, dh and I told the boys that if they ever chose to be circ'd, we'd pay. It's their bodies, and we'd support them. To date, they have told dh that they are VERY happy that they are intact and have no intent of changing that. Dh is very happy intact as well, and none of them have ever had any issues. As my dh's sex partner, neither have I. Granted, I don't know everyone in the world. But I know many intact males, and families where the males are intact, and dont know anyone who's ever had any issues related to that. To be fair, I don't know anyone with a botched circ either, although I do know two boys who had to have it re-done in adolesence. |
My brother's circ was botched. He peed sideways until he was 7. And then had it corrected when he was 7. |