Yes. You are right, I do win. And, until they can start making their own meals, i am the boss. I don't make multiple meals. I make one that includes one thing i know they like. I don't force feed them, but I'm no short order cook. If they don't eat everything they can have a piece of fruit or raw vegetables. Do you really think it's ok for your kids to talk back to you? In my world that's disrespectful and rude regardless of the ages of the people involved. |
I am the second poster. I win because I have a child who got plenty to eat every day and never went hungry. We had nice family meals with no tantrums. My reward is happy mealtimes and a happy, pleasant child. Who, as I said, is dropping his aversions and trying more foods all the time. On his timetable, not mine. I wasn't really a picky eater as a child, but I hated fruit. Can't stand the texture of it. Still don't really like it. It feels like I'm eating sand and gravel. I knew for my son it was a texture issue as well, and forcing the issue would be abuse, basically. My parents pulled the bullshit "sit at the table until you eat this horrible piece of crap" one time, and I've never forgotten or forgiven them for it. It was a dick move, and I won't do it to my child. |
Then you fall into the 40%, but you argued the lazy parent side. Why? Do you truly believe lazy parents cannot be the cause of a picky eater? We don't have drama at the table either. I won't engage in an argument about food. Our kids are provided two choices: eat what is given or don't and you can have fruit or raw vegetables. No drama and no short order cook. Does that mean I win too? |