+1 |
| I think we are meant to think our kids are the cutest and the best. That's why we don't eat them or throw them out the window even after months of sleep deprivation. |
I I feel really bad for kid models. It should not be allowed. |
| I used to babysit for two of the most gorgeous baby girls (Gerber esque) who were unrelated....they are both now not so good looking young adults. Another baby who was kind of funny looking with awkward features is now a pretty attractive young woman. SO you never know. |
| Isn't that biologically programmed so parents take care of their kids? |
| I think my 4-year-old is average. When she was younger there were many months at a time I thought she was kind of funny looking. I did not eat her. |
| I don't know... I think I'm objective. My baby is cute: very regular features, round symmetrical head, no funny puffy folds on face, no ears, etc. sticking out. But DC does not have Gerber baby looks - i.e. huge eyes, very full lashes, very chubby rosy cheecks, curls. So I think I can tell the difference. Nonetheless the way my baby looks is "best" to me - and I can (and have) spent hours just looking at DC. But I can still "see" the objective ideal - just does not have any emotional resonance for me. |