Does anyone else think that Kate Middleton's wedding dress was a little dull?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It was elegant, classy and timeless. Perfect for a lady of her stature and for the abbey. She looked beautiful.

Totally agree! Truly beautiful. Pure class.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was nice but a little dull.

And I agree that Kate is attractive but not gorgeous. To me, she looks older than her age (in the face). She has a nice figure but it would be so much better if she had some hips.

This. She is attractive and obviously well-groomed, but I just couldn't believe she is only 29. In some pictures she looked like she might be pushing forties!

Yes, exactly!

The eyebrows are over plucked, that always ages a person. The other thing that adds years is highlights in the hair.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was nice but a little dull.

And I agree that Kate is attractive but not gorgeous. To me, she looks older than her age (in the face). She has a nice figure but it would be so much better if she had some hips.

This. She is attractive and obviously well-groomed, but I just couldn't believe she is only 29. In some pictures she looked like she might be pushing forties!

Yes, exactly!

The eyebrows are over plucked, that always ages a person. The other thing that adds years is highlights in the hair.

Totally disagree. I thought she looked like a child bride.
BTW, she also looked much, much, MUCH too thin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was nice but a little dull.

And I agree that Kate is attractive but not gorgeous. To me, she looks older than her age (in the face). She has a nice figure but it would be so much better if she had some hips.

This. She is attractive and obviously well-groomed, but I just couldn't believe she is only 29. In some pictures she looked like she might be pushing forties!

Yes, exactly!

The eyebrows are over plucked, that always ages a person. The other thing that adds years is highlights in the hair.

Totally disagree. I thought she looked like a child bride.
BTW, she also looked much, much, MUCH too thin.

Um, she is not too thin...you can never be too thin...or too rich.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was nice but a little dull.

And I agree that Kate is attractive but not gorgeous. To me, she looks older than her age (in the face). She has a nice figure but it would be so much better if she had some hips.

This. She is attractive and obviously well-groomed, but I just couldn't believe she is only 29. In some pictures she looked like she might be pushing forties!

Yes, exactly!

She should start pushing out babies without delay.

[Anonymous]

Looking at Posh's shoes makes MY feet hurt. And that's not a good look.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was nice but a little dull.

And I agree that Kate is attractive but not gorgeous. To me, she looks older than her age (in the face). She has a nice figure but it would be so much better if she had some hips.

This. She is attractive and obviously well-groomed, but I just couldn't believe she is only 29. In some pictures she looked like she might be pushing forties!

Yes, exactly!

She should start pushing out babies without delay.

You women are insane. She is 29 and looked beautiful today! It only makes you sound bitter to make such hateful comments about someone on their special day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was nice but a little dull.

And I agree that Kate is attractive but not gorgeous. To me, she looks older than her age (in the face). She has a nice figure but it would be so much better if she had some hips.

This. She is attractive and obviously well-groomed, but I just couldn't believe she is only 29. In some pictures she looked like she might be pushing forties!

Yes, exactly!

She should start pushing out babies without delay.

You women are insane. She is 29 and looked beautiful today! It only makes you sound bitter to make such hateful comments about someone on their special day.

I agree. I thought she was absolutely beautiful. Honestly, one of the most beautiful brides since Grace Kelly. I would kill to have her looks!

[Anonymous]

The dress was gorgeous. It is exactly what I would have chosen for myself. Totally reminiscent of Grace Kelly, as Ivanka Trump's was, too.

BTW, everyone who is gushing over Pippa's dress, did you notice how much difficulty she was having walking in it?!?! She was trying so hard not to fall and had to sidestep up and down the stairs at Westminster Abbey. Too tight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It was nice but a little dull.

And I agree that Kate is attractive but not gorgeous. To me, she looks older than her age (in the face). She has a nice figure but it would be so much better if she had some hips.

This. She is attractive and obviously well-groomed, but I just couldn't believe she is only 29. In some pictures she looked like she might be pushing forties!

Yes, exactly!

She should start pushing out babies without delay.

Damn right. It's her duty, after all.

[Anonymous]

It was classy, understated, but appopriate for the scale of the venue. At least she didn't try to look like a tacky fashionista like some of the guests in their over decorated, weirdo outfits.

[Anonymous]

Pippa's dress was dreadful! I guess cap sleeves are back, but cowl neck too? Together? I think the dress has a really dated look, like 1999. And I agree with a PP that the look is too young.

[Anonymous]

What's with the pointed breasts? Same on the afterparty dress. Is it the 50"s?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who was the perplexed looking one with the obvious nose job--any know?

Are you talking about the one with the deep-blue hat that looked like a tongue? That's Tara Palmer-Tomkinson. On CNN Piers Morgan was going on and on about how her nose was famously destroyed by doing too much cocaine and she had to have it reconstructed. I couldn't tell if he was pulling his sleep-deprived viewers' legs, but look, Wikipedia says it's true:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tara_Palmer-Tomkinson

Yes! That was the one! She really looked really, really edgy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What's with the pointed breasts? Same on the afterparty dress. Is it the 50"s?

I agree with this, actually. I thought both dresses were absolutely stunning, except for the oddly shaped bodices. I assume the shape/design was intentional -- but why?