Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Should my low GPA TJ kid, rising junior, transfer to a school where they can stand out more? FCCPS. My worry is that their low gpa will considered worse if they go to a school with inflated gpa.
Honestly being a TJ Senior parent - low GPA at TJ is very subjective. Everybody will be happy when kid gets into TJ and thinks they end up at MIT / Harvard when the reality is completely different unless you are at the top 10% of TJ with GPA over 4.6. Most of TJ kids end up in regular schools not top 20.
At TJ because of its intense competition, GPA 4.35 is considered top 1/3rd of the class unfortunately from what school counselors said. What GPA are you referring to here?. Low GPA from TJ won't even get you into UVA or VT. If you change school, you will have to explain in the Common App additional information section why school change was made in Junior year to give admission officers context why the change was made.
According to Naviance, Harvard and MIT are the only schools where the GPA of the average admit is above 4.6.
A 4.6 GPA is extremely difficult.
If your GPA is above 4.6 and your SAT is 1570 or higher, you've got pretty close to a 25% chance at Harvard from TJ.
Almost everybody from TJ gets into VT.
Sourcr?
Naviance.
Naviance cannot tell you this. You have no idea if it was ecs, essays, hooks, etc. plus naviance in fcps is an average of more than one year’s worth of info.
So dumb you make that claim.
I was responding to the ridiculous notion that these schools are unrealistic unless you have a 4.6 GPA. 4.6 is the average GPA of accepted students. About half of the accepted students have lower GPAs. Sure it's rare but it's not crazy rare. Did you think I was saying that all you needed was a GPA and SAT score, WTF is wrong with you?
The statistics are the statistics. 25% of Harvard applicants with a 4.6 GPA or higher and a 1570 SAT or higher get accepted. I'm sure some of them have cracked ECs or they are hooked but there is no reason to believe they are hooked more frequently than those with lower GPA/SATs or that they have significantly better ECs than those with lower GPAs/SATs.
And it doesn't hurt that naviance is more than 1 year's worth of info, more datapoints just makes it more valid.