Did you read the rest of my post? It’s not *just* about the score. Work samples need to reflect the testing. As an aside, it’s weird that so many people share WISC scores with you. |
Nah, the difference is most of the better kids had already gone to AAP in 2nd and 3rd grades. So, less competition in 4th grade. |
Did you not read? The pp said his/her child was in pool, meaning that child had a really high score. And according to the posts here, we know a significant number of AAP kids don’t really have high scores.
|
What do you think changed? my kid is 3rd grade this year and got rejected again second time and cant understand what is missing... is it math or reading ir writing or hope scale... can give more details what you did different this year? and maybe your kid got more additional classes somewhere? my kid used to go to RSM but in 2nd grade I took her out of it and I wonder maybe that was a mistake. |
WISC is not mandatory for appeal but I’d consider it depending on child’s scores and also, given how new NGAT is. Otherwise, you need to show any new info for appeal — That could be new work samples, new scores (Iready, MAP from winter/spring) etc. |
Let them know what your child is not getting by being rejected. |
I don't think that's true. I successfully appealed for my son 2 years ago with a 136 WISC. That seemed to be around the threshold based on other posts here at the time. |
If your child needs RSM to get the test scores needed to get into AAP then your child doesn’t belong in AAP. Kids shouldn’t need tutoring or supplementation to be in AAP. The fact that they need help to be in slightly advanced classes in ES says they don’t need AAP. AAP is not all that. Pushing your child to do extra work so they might get into a class that is going to require additional work is not a great idea. You are creating a spiral of pressure and additional support needs that will only build. |
Kids can have all sorts of teachers and learning experiences prior to AAP. Some might require some sort of supplementation at home because otherwise perfectly capable kid will not learn much.. |
|
My boy is in 2nd grade.
NNAT 149 NGAT 156 He didn’t get in. I think the possible reason is he’s a trouble maker in school. |
RSM is not tutoring or supplementation. It’s accelerated math. My 2nd grader attends AOPS, and I used math homework’s from there as the sample works from home. The math they teach in these places is beyond what they learn in school often 2 grades above their current grade material. My 2nd grader attends AOPS because he complained that he wasn’t learning math in school since 1st grade (he didn’t think counting and sorting as math). He’s eligible for AAP. |
ask your AART for the package they submitted, check the hope score. Schedule the WISC right away with GMU, you want to do this as soon as possible. work on your appeal letter to focus on social and emotional aspects of your child. I did extensive research on profoundly gifted children and their behavior and potential impact if they are not in the right peer group, quoted those researches in the appeal letter. This worked for my 5th grader when I had to appeal for him few years back (NNAT 160, CoGat 144, WISC 154). |
|
It seems like the hardest appeal would be a mediocre or worse HOPE score. If I were in that boat, I’d seek out other teachers who may be able to counter that narrative to see if they could write something on your student’s behalf.
Step one for non-eligible is get your application package from the AART or principal - ask for it today. Try to figure out where the weakness in the application lies, and counter that weakness in the appeal. Good luck all. I really dislike this process and how it sorts kids at such an early age. |
|
DH and I are having a debate. He thinks EVERY kid is considered for full time AAP. I thought you specifically needed to apply for it (and it's just that all kids are considered for level 3.
Which one of us is correct? |
both partially correct. The universal screener will identify top 10% in your local school and those are called "in-pool", means your kids are automatically referred by the score. If you're not in-pool, you have to parent refer (apply) the student, and the teacher will add the material from school to complete the packet. Above is only for level 4. For level 3, yes every kid is considered. |