Would you consider dating someone who sees/has seen escorts?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Only MAGAs oppose decriminalizing honest sex-work.

+1

Laws banning so-called “prostitution” are misogynistic and lead to exploiting women.

Decriminalize sex work!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Ew. No. Men who pay for sex are offensive.

Same for women who charge for sex? Even the married ones who stay for the money?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ew. No. Men who pay for sex are offensive.

Women pay for sex too.

Male escorts are quite lucrative in the D.C. and L.A. areas. They have to be 10/10's though, while women can be 1/10 to 10/10 and all do well.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ew. No. Men who pay for sex are offensive.

Women pay for sex too.

Male escorts are quite lucrative in the D.C. and L.A. areas. They have to be 10/10's though, while women can be 1/10 to 10/10 and all do well.

Most of the male escorts in these areas are not catering to women...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Guy here. If I were female my answer would be no way. Many of those escorts are trafficked and forced into that life. I couldn’t date anyone who was a willing participant in that. I’m not Melania.

Do you watch porn?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ew. No. Men who pay for sex are offensive.

Women pay for sex too.

Male escorts are quite lucrative in the D.C. and L.A. areas. They have to be 10/10's though, while women can be 1/10 to 10/10 and all do well.

Men for women escorts? Or men for men? Where do you find them?

[Anonymous]

Nope

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ew. No. Men who pay for sex are offensive.

Women pay for sex too.

Male escorts are quite lucrative in the D.C. and L.A. areas. They have to be 10/10's though, while women can be 1/10 to 10/10 and all do well.

Men for women escorts? Or men for men? Where do you find them?

Not today Mr. Vice man.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ew. No. Men who pay for sex are offensive.

Women pay for sex too.

Male escorts are quite lucrative in the D.C. and L.A. areas. They have to be 10/10's though, while women can be 1/10 to 10/10 and all do well.

Most of the male escorts in these areas are not catering to women...

That says a lot about government workers. LMAO!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Only MAGAs oppose decriminalizing honest sex-work.

Most escrort workers oppose making it legal actually. It would hurt their profits and business.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only MAGAs oppose decriminalizing honest sex-work.

Most escrort workers oppose making it legal actually. It would hurt their profits and business.

De-crim is not the same as legal.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Guy here. If I were female my answer would be no way. Many of those escorts are trafficked and forced into that life. I couldn’t date anyone who was a willing participant in that. I’m not Melania.

Do you watch porn?

Yes, I have in the past but have mostly watched amateur where couples produce their own content.

[Anonymous]

Sex workers are disgusting and deserve the social stigma.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Only MAGAs oppose decriminalizing honest sex-work.

+1

Laws banning so-called “prostitution” are misogynistic and lead to exploiting women.

Decriminalize sex work!

Wrong.

https://nordicmodelnow.org/myths-about-prostitution/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sex workers are disgusting and deserve the social stigma.

What about the people that use them?