Commanders or Redskins?
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
| Redskins is only true name. |
Anonymous
| I dont really care but Redskins is a much better brand/logo |
Anonymous
| Redskins. Keep on them. We can right this wrong. |
Anonymous
| I am appalled at how many people support the former name. I thought DC residents were more evolved. |
Anonymous
+1 |
Anonymous
| Redskins Redskins Redskins. |
Anonymous
Transplants rarely actually know the city or its residents. You live in some bubble and act like that’s the entire city. |
Anonymous
| I want Redskins to come back if only to make more lib turds cry. |
Anonymous
|
What’s the third choice?
Dislike both C & R. Stars & Bars |
Anonymous
| It is 2025, not 1985. What are maga people living in the past and why would non-white people want to live in the past, too? It’s a slippery slope folks. |
Anonymous
It's surprising to many that tons of born and raised DC residents are not as progressive as the transplants. We're the Blue Dog democrats who don't get offended. The Redskins were a pivotal part of all our lives in the 80s and 90s. The transplants are the ones with the loudest voices sadly. |
Anonymous
| Why do white people find it so pivotal to hold on to the name Redskins? |
Anonymous
You mean the suburban residents, the District is Redskins territory. |
Anonymous
This seems to be the main reason. It's also why Trump.is bringing this up to distract from Pedo A Largo. |
Anonymous
Exactly! |