What right do we have to tell Iran they can’t have nuclear bombs?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting to me how DCUM comes out of the woodwork to support the premier terrorist nation of all time, just because they hate Trump so much. DCUM also loves their Trans-men, who definitely would be “obliterated” under Islamic rule. Seems hypocritical to love both.

Interesting to me how Zionists comes out of the woodwork to support the premier terrorist nation of all time (Israel), just because they hate Arabs so much. Zionists also love their international law when it suites turn, but has definitely been “obliterated” in Gaza under a genocidal regime. Seems hypocritical to love both

Pop Quiz for you:

What’s the only nation in the Middle East with a democratically elected government, with a legislature composed of members who are Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Druze and LGBTQIA+ ?

Yeah, no one is gonna answer this one 😏

I’ll add another, how many open gay or trans in the Iranian government? Righteous dudes they are ?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting to me how DCUM comes out of the woodwork to support the premier terrorist nation of all time, just because they hate Trump so much. DCUM also loves their Trans-men, who definitely would be “obliterated” under Islamic rule. Seems hypocritical to love both.

The logical fallacy employed by MAGA is unsurprising. Just because someone doesn't think there should be a Gaza genocide or the US bombing Iran, doesn't mean one supports terrorists.

it does, because Gaza and Iran are both terrorist states, sponsoring and engaging in terror. It's not possible to neatly and surgically parse out the "good" Gazans and Iranians from those who personify pure evil. When Gaza and Iran renounce terror, it'll be a different story, but the people at large seem fine with it, whether they personally carry out attacks or instead limit themselves to encouraging demonstrations in the street.

We’ve supported a fair number of terrorists ourselves you know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting to me how DCUM comes out of the woodwork to support the premier terrorist nation of all time, just because they hate Trump so much. DCUM also loves their Trans-men, who definitely would be “obliterated” under Islamic rule. Seems hypocritical to love both.

Interesting to me how Zionists comes out of the woodwork to support the premier terrorist nation of all time (Israel), just because they hate Arabs so much. Zionists also love their international law when it suites turn, but has definitely been “obliterated” in Gaza under a genocidal regime. Seems hypocritical to love both

Pop Quiz for you:

What’s the only nation in the Middle East with a democratically elected government, with a legislature composed of members who are Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Druze and LGBTQIA+ ?

Her head will explode if she has to answer that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting to me how DCUM comes out of the woodwork to support the premier terrorist nation of all time, just because they hate Trump so much. DCUM also loves their Trans-men, who definitely would be “obliterated” under Islamic rule. Seems hypocritical to love both.

Interesting to me how Zionists comes out of the woodwork to support the premier terrorist nation of all time (Israel), just because they hate Arabs so much. Zionists also love their international law when it suites turn, but has definitely been “obliterated” in Gaza under a genocidal regime. Seems hypocritical to love both

Pop Quiz for you:

What’s the only nation in the Middle East with a democratically elected government, with a legislature composed of members who are Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Druze and LGBTQIA+ ?

Pop Quiz for you:

What’s the only nation in the Middle East with a "democratically" elected government, who's been committing a genocide against Palestinians composed of members who are Christian, Muslim, Druze and LGBTQIA+ ?

What genocide? All I see is a country trying to free their hostages from terrorists. Don't like the casualties which ensue? Release the hostages. Hold hostages? Die. Simple.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What right do democrats have to tell me I shouldn’t be allowed to have an AR-15?

No one has obliterated your AR-15

I trust Iran more than I trust Trump and sycophants.

Of course you do. Not even the least little bit surprised to hear you say that.

You Progs hate other Americans far more than you’d ever dislike an enemy of our country. We know that. We’ve always known that. You’d rather see us dead instead.


We know.

No one is trying to take away your rifle or pistol and Iran isn't shooting up our kids in schools or churches or grocery stores every other day. So weighing the bigger threat, it's 100% Americans with guns meant for war.

I love how libs always start posts like this one ^^^ with something like “nO oNe Is tRyInG tO tAkE yUr gUNz aWaY!”…. And then they proceed to explain why we should take everyone’s guns away. That’s some hilarious sh!t right there 😆

Wow. Talk about a lack of comprehension. We used to have an AR ban and mass shootings were down. ARs are directly connected to our mass shootings. Can we own bombs? What about grenades? Define "Arms"?

WELL REGULATED is a phrase that's a part of the 2nd amendment. But whatever, cling on tight to that machine gun. It's what Jesus would do, right?

Oh my comprehension is just fine, thanks.

Here’s a homework assignment for ya:

Look into what the phrase “well regulated” meant in the context of 1791 prose.

Hint: it doesn’t mean “subjected to lots of rules, laws, regulations or……. infringements.

1791 the US military was under 1000 people. Therefore the govt wanted militas as a backup plan made of citizens. Well regulated didn't mean red tape but it did mean rules, structure and training. Not to mention it took 30 seconds to reload a gun then, an AR can slaughter a classroom of kids in 30 seconds.

Fast forward to now, you have twisted it to desperately cling onto your machine guns and we have the largest and most robust military in the world. At the very least we should have background checks and training requirements and a limit on what type of weapon an average citizen can own.

[Anonymous]

Trump is now proposing Obama’s JCPOA as a resolution. I guess when he does it, it is good.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What right do democrats have to tell me I shouldn’t be allowed to have an AR-15?

No one has obliterated your AR-15

I trust Iran more than I trust Trump and sycophants.

Of course you do. Not even the least little bit surprised to hear you say that.

You Progs hate other Americans far more than you’d ever dislike an enemy of our country. We know that. We’ve always known that. You’d rather see us dead instead.


We know.

No one is trying to take away your rifle or pistol and Iran isn't shooting up our kids in schools or churches or grocery stores every other day. So weighing the bigger threat, it's 100% Americans with guns meant for war.

I love how libs always start posts like this one ^^^ with something like “nO oNe Is tRyInG tO tAkE yUr gUNz aWaY!”…. And then they proceed to explain why we should take everyone’s guns away. That’s some hilarious sh!t right there 😆

Wow. Talk about a lack of comprehension. We used to have an AR ban and mass shootings were down. ARs are directly connected to our mass shootings. Can we own bombs? What about grenades? Define "Arms"?

WELL REGULATED is a phrase that's a part of the 2nd amendment. But whatever, cling on tight to that machine gun. It's what Jesus would do, right?

Oh my comprehension is just fine, thanks.

Here’s a homework assignment for ya:

Look into what the phrase “well regulated” meant in the context of 1791 prose.

Hint: it doesn’t mean “subjected to lots of rules, laws, regulations or……. infringements.

1791 the US military was under 1000 people. Therefore the govt wanted militas as a backup plan made of citizens. Well regulated didn't mean red tape but it did mean rules, structure and training. Not to mention it took 30 seconds to reload a gun then, an AR can slaughter a classroom of kids in 30 seconds.

Fast forward to now, you have twisted it to desperately cling onto your machine guns and we have the largest and most robust military in the world. At the very least we should have background checks and training requirements and a limit on what type of weapon an average citizen can own.

You have failed.

That is not the period-correct definition of the word “regulated”.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting to me how DCUM comes out of the woodwork to support the premier terrorist nation of all time, just because they hate Trump so much. DCUM also loves their Trans-men, who definitely would be “obliterated” under Islamic rule. Seems hypocritical to love both.

Interesting to me how Zionists comes out of the woodwork to support the premier terrorist nation of all time (Israel), just because they hate Arabs so much. Zionists also love their international law when it suites turn, but has definitely been “obliterated” in Gaza under a genocidal regime. Seems hypocritical to love both

Pop Quiz for you:

What’s the only nation in the Middle East with a democratically elected government, with a legislature composed of members who are Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Druze and LGBTQIA+ ?

Her head will explode if she has to answer that.

+1. It would be like that old 70’s movie “Scanners”.

Messy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Same reason why Israel can have nukes despite bombing six countries in the past year while actively committing a genocide

Great point.

The fact that Israel has nukes (lots of them in fact) but ISN’T using them is exactly why Israel CAN have them.

North Korea has lots of nukes as well and isn't using them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting to me how DCUM comes out of the woodwork to support the premier terrorist nation of all time, just because they hate Trump so much. DCUM also loves their Trans-men, who definitely would be “obliterated” under Islamic rule. Seems hypocritical to love both.

Interesting to me how Zionists comes out of the woodwork to support the premier terrorist nation of all time (Israel), just because they hate Arabs so much. Zionists also love their international law when it suites turn, but has definitely been “obliterated” in Gaza under a genocidal regime. Seems hypocritical to love both

Pop Quiz for you:

What’s the only nation in the Middle East with a democratically elected government, with a legislature composed of members who are Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Druze and LGBTQIA+ ?

Pop Quiz for you:

What’s the only nation in the Middle East with a "democratically" elected government, who's been committing a genocide against Palestinians composed of members who are Christian, Muslim, Druze and LGBTQIA+ ?

What genocide? All I see is a country trying to free their hostages from terrorists. Don't like the casualties which ensue? Release the hostages. Hold hostages? Die. Simple.

+1

Not too mention the standing offer of $1M dollars and protected status and/or safe passage to anywhere in the world for any Gaza resident who brought out an Israeli hostage.


Not a single person took the offer.


Keeping Israeli hostages was worth more to them. To ALL of them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Same reason why Israel can have nukes despite bombing six countries in the past year while actively committing a genocide

Great point.

The fact that Israel has nukes (lots of them in fact) but ISN’T using them is exactly why Israel CAN have them.

North Korea has lots of nukes as well and isn't using them.

And how many bombs has Trump dropped on the NorKs?

[Anonymous]

There's no right or wrong, there are only interests.

Many people in the US and in allied countries believe that Iran having nukes goes strongly against their interests.

Nobody actually knows if Iran would be a responsible nuclear armed country, maybe they would. But given their apocalyptic rhetoric towards their rivals and actions they've taken to destabilize the regional balance of power, there is a strong argument in favor of preventing them from getting a bomb through any means necessary. If there's even a 5-10% chance they would use a bomb and not adhere to MAD, we need to stop them. Even if they were rational and wouldn't use a nuke first, having this nuclear deterrent would embolden them to become increasingly belligerent in their non-nuclear aggression.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What right do democrats have to tell me I shouldn’t be allowed to have an AR-15?

No one has obliterated your AR-15

I trust Iran more than I trust Trump and sycophants.

Of course you do. Not even the least little bit surprised to hear you say that.

You Progs hate other Americans far more than you’d ever dislike an enemy of our country. We know that. We’ve always known that. You’d rather see us dead instead.


We know.

No one is trying to take away your rifle or pistol and Iran isn't shooting up our kids in schools or churches or grocery stores every other day. So weighing the bigger threat, it's 100% Americans with guns meant for war.

I love how libs always start posts like this one ^^^ with something like “nO oNe Is tRyInG tO tAkE yUr gUNz aWaY!”…. And then they proceed to explain why we should take everyone’s guns away. That’s some hilarious sh!t right there 😆

Wow. Talk about a lack of comprehension. We used to have an AR ban and mass shootings were down. ARs are directly connected to our mass shootings. Can we own bombs? What about grenades? Define "Arms"?

WELL REGULATED is a phrase that's a part of the 2nd amendment. But whatever, cling on tight to that machine gun. It's what Jesus would do, right?

Oh my comprehension is just fine, thanks.

Here’s a homework assignment for ya:

Look into what the phrase “well regulated” meant in the context of 1791 prose.

Hint: it doesn’t mean “subjected to lots of rules, laws, regulations or……. infringements.

1791 the US military was under 1000 people. Therefore the govt wanted militas as a backup plan made of citizens. Well regulated didn't mean red tape but it did mean rules, structure and training. Not to mention it took 30 seconds to reload a gun then, an AR can slaughter a classroom of kids in 30 seconds.

Fast forward to now, you have twisted it to desperately cling onto your machine guns and we have the largest and most robust military in the world. At the very least we should have background checks and training requirements and a limit on what type of weapon an average citizen can own.

You have failed.

That is not the period-correct definition of the word “regulated”.

Is this what brain on MAGA looks like?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting to me how DCUM comes out of the woodwork to support the premier terrorist nation of all time, just because they hate Trump so much. DCUM also loves their Trans-men, who definitely would be “obliterated” under Islamic rule. Seems hypocritical to love both.

Interesting to me how Zionists comes out of the woodwork to support the premier terrorist nation of all time (Israel), just because they hate Arabs so much. Zionists also love their international law when it suites turn, but has definitely been “obliterated” in Gaza under a genocidal regime. Seems hypocritical to love both

Pop Quiz for you:

What’s the only nation in the Middle East with a democratically elected government, with a legislature composed of members who are Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Druze and LGBTQIA+ ?

Pop Quiz for you:

What’s the only nation in the Middle East with a "democratically" elected government, who's been committing a genocide against Palestinians composed of members who are Christian, Muslim, Druze and LGBTQIA+ ?

What genocide? All I see is a country trying to free their hostages from terrorists. Don't like the casualties which ensue? Release the hostages. Hold hostages? Die. Simple.

+1

Not too mention the standing offer of $1M dollars and protected status and/or safe passage to anywhere in the world for any Gaza resident who brought out an Israeli hostage.


Not a single person took the offer.


Keeping Israeli hostages was worth more to them. To ALL of them.

Does the average Gaza resident have access to hostages and the ability to walk them out?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What right do democrats have to tell me I shouldn’t be allowed to have an AR-15?

No one has obliterated your AR-15

I trust Iran more than I trust Trump and sycophants.

Of course you do. Not even the least little bit surprised to hear you say that.

You Progs hate other Americans far more than you’d ever dislike an enemy of our country. We know that. We’ve always known that. You’d rather see us dead instead.


We know.

+100
The PP is one of the most unsurprising, completely predictable responses in the history of DCUM.