This assessment is silly. Half those programs don’t even have half the engineering disciplines Purdue has let alone can objectively called ‘better’. Whatever than is supposed to mean. |
It's ranked 8 overall for engineering but much higher in certain fields of engineering such as aerospace. https://engineering.purdue.edu/Engr/AboutUs/FactsFigures/Rankings |
+1 ABET is the minimum needed but to maximize top recruitment in Engineering from the best companies and also if the kid has interest in start-up/emerging tech culture, you need certain classes: a lot of math and physics already accomplished by soph year is a leg up in getting paid summer E jobs, which then puts one ahead for jobs after junior year. The weaker schools are not targets for high paying E jobs because mostly because the students are less prepared |
This is great to hear! Thank you for letting me know, and congrats and best wishes to your son as well! |
I can't take seriously anyone who says, "I seen ..." Good luck. |
Same to you and your daughter! |
Thank you!
|
Purdue is the 8th best engineering undergraduate university in the country. It has been a difficult admit for over a decade. Many of the schools listed above are stronger overall as a university and have more difficult admissions. They are not better at engineering. They do not think they are better at engineering. The engineering rankings are largely based on peer assessments from other schools. |
This might help you understand stats srent everything at all. https://www.reddit.com/r/ApplyingToCollege/s/Xk0Gq2tKMu |
Many Purdue engineering grads would never get in now if they graduated some time ago. Purdue, and I’m sure Northeastern, has made a strong push to grow in certain directions. It’s not just that years have passed. It’s also that universities do active development in certain areas. |
Based on the list, it seems to mean the usual prestige obsession without any substance to it. |
yup. It's the Ivy obsessed crowd. they can't stop themselves from typing.. |
| Have a son at Purdue in engineering - it is TOUGH!! And they over admitted last year and found themselves in a housing/town capacity/university capacity pickle. Kudos to Purdue for trying to balance things out by severely limiting acceptances this year vs just “going for the money” and continuing to crowd the school/community resources. Son’s classmates are a very balanced mix of true genius (the 1600/high rigor/ECs that read like a Nobel prize winner), the smart but balanced type (still great stats but also into liberal arts/great social skills evidenced by ECs), LOTS of international kids, and kids that you ask yourself how on earth they got in (lower than average stats) but are ironically usually getting the best grades bc they can grind out the work and are self-motivated. Purdue does not, in ANY way, enable the students. Widely known for grade deflation - sometimes test averages are in the 30s and the professors just shrug and say “guess you didn’t learn the concept, better luck next time”. |
True, but it is a small sliver of E-jobs at the very top of the market that preferentially target MIT/Ivy/CMU/UCB level over Purdue. Purdue does better than the vast majority of E-schools looking at jobs after BSE. Not being a target for the super elite tech jobs is not important for most undergrads. Similar issue with those who always point out on DCUM that you cannot go into top finance(quant ala Jane Street, 2Sig) or top consulting(MBB) from non-ivy+. So? There remain plenty of regional finance and consulting careers that pay very well and hire from SMU, Fordham, UMD. Most grads do not care about the tip-top segments of the job market. |
What the freak are you talking about? You kid doesn't get into one school and this is the reaction you have. Grow all the way up. |