Meta Bend the Knee

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will liberals be hating on Mark Zuckerberg like they hate Elon Musk for not going along with their censorship of conservatives?

I'm an Independent who thinks misinformation and conspiracy theories are going to ruin this country.

Misinformation like Biden is spry and runs circles around his young aides?

Or Hunters laptop is Russian propaganda

Or inflation is just transitory?

Or the covid vaccine will stop you from getting and transmitting the virus?

Or the border is secure?

This post is EXHIBIT A. All of these things are (putting aside the overt ignorance) opinions. Not facts. And speculative conclusions.

But that you think it is factual, and even worse clever to make your point, says why fact checking is necessary.

You think it’s an opinion that Hunter’s laptop was real?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol at the crying liberals on this board who no longer count on Zuckerberg to squash speech.

Misinformation isn’t speech, a$$wipe.

Yes it is. It absolutely is, because who decides what is misinformation?

I’m old enough to remember when women claimed that the Covid vaccine was messing with their menstruation and it was censored and labeled misinformation.

Turned out to be true!

Cite your sources

DP

My uterus is MY source. After my 2nd Moderna shot in 2021, I skipped two periods, then had short duration periods every 14-16 days, for several months.

That was some scary sh*t.

LOL "scary sht". I can see why no one took you seriously.

All of my children have been born in my 30s and my fertility is extremely important to me. If I was having issues that impacted my fertility, I would be scared too. To be lied to on top of it adds insult to injury. To then have to deal with tremendous a-holes such as yourself - you are part of what’s wrong with modern society. Something is seriously wrong with you. Perhaps you should take a moment to reflect.
-NP

DP. Then maybe PP should've looked closer at her hormones who were very likely the culprit, and not a random vaccine.

The vaccine has been associated with changes in menstrual cycle duration and heavier bleeding.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol at the crying liberals on this board who no longer count on Zuckerberg to squash speech.

Misinformation isn’t speech, a$$wipe.

Yes it is. It absolutely is, because who decides what is misinformation?

I’m old enough to remember when women claimed that the Covid vaccine was messing with their menstruation and it was censored and labeled misinformation.

Turned out to be true!

Cite your sources

DP

My uterus is MY source. After my 2nd Moderna shot in 2021, I skipped two periods, then had short duration periods every 14-16 days, for several months.

That was some scary sh*t.

LOL "scary sht". I can see why no one took you seriously.

All of my children have been born in my 30s and my fertility is extremely important to me. If I was having issues that impacted my fertility, I would be scared too. To be lied to on top of it adds insult to injury. To then have to deal with tremendous a-holes such as yourself - you are part of what’s wrong with modern society. Something is seriously wrong with you. Perhaps you should take a moment to reflect.
-NP

Why would you assume that a temporary disruption to menstruation is a threat to fertility? All kinds of stressors can do this. It doesn’t make a woman infertile.

People who tried to tie vaccine related disruptions in mensuration (which I am not denying; it makes sense that they happened) to infertility was trying to scare women for political points.

Get a better science education so you aren’t so easily manipulated.

Wrong. The issue was that when women started speaking up about the changes in their cycles that they were experiencing, their concerns were discounted just like that first follow up did did to the original poster talking about her period. Science is about being open to hypotheses and then testing them, not insisting that women’s stories were hormones right off the bat. That silencing is exactly what the problem was and THAT is what has led to manipulation and lack of trust.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol at the crying liberals on this board who no longer count on Zuckerberg to squash speech.

Misinformation isn’t speech, a$$wipe.

Yes it is. It absolutely is, because who decides what is misinformation?

I’m old enough to remember when women claimed that the Covid vaccine was messing with their menstruation and it was censored and labeled misinformation.

Turned out to be true!

Cite your sources

https://www.nichd.nih.gov/newsroom/news/022924-COVID-19-vaccination-menstrual-cycle#:~:text=On%20average%2C%20individuals%20who%20received,in%20the%20cycle%20after%20vaccination.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What a piece of garbage. So they’re abdicating responsibility to ensure what people are posting is factual. And allowing disinformation and facts to be equated. Shameful.

He is saying they tried, but their own fact checkers got too political and biased so he isn’t going to any longer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:What a piece of garbage. So they’re abdicating responsibility to ensure what people are posting is factual. And allowing disinformation and facts to be equated. Shameful.

Get a liberal group to declare something as misinformation.
Use this finding to censor Republican speech.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will liberals be hating on Mark Zuckerberg like they hate Elon Musk for not going along with their censorship of conservatives?

I'm an Independent who thinks misinformation and conspiracy theories are going to ruin this country.

Misinformation like Biden is spry and runs circles around his young aides?

Or Hunters laptop is Russian propaganda

Or inflation is just transitory?

Or the covid vaccine will stop you from getting and transmitting the virus?

Or the border is secure?

This post is EXHIBIT A. All of these things are (putting aside the overt ignorance) opinions. Not facts. And speculative conclusions.

But that you think it is factual, and even worse clever to make your point, says why fact checking is necessary.

You think it’s an opinion that Hunter’s laptop was real?

You have it backwards. The 'fact' was that the laptop is fake, and based on this report of disinformation, which the FBI had preseeded knowing the story was coming, Facebook censored all links to the New York Post's story.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What a piece of garbage. So they’re abdicating responsibility to ensure what people are posting is factual. And allowing disinformation and facts to be equated. Shameful.

Get a liberal group to declare something as misinformation.
Use this finding to censor Republican speech.

Yep, that’s really all this was. Nothing more complicated than that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will liberals be hating on Mark Zuckerberg like they hate Elon Musk for not going along with their censorship of conservatives?

I'm an Independent who thinks misinformation and conspiracy theories are going to ruin this country.

Misinformation like Biden is spry and runs circles around his young aides?

Or Hunters laptop is Russian propaganda

Or inflation is just transitory?

Or the covid vaccine will stop you from getting and transmitting the virus?

Or the border is secure?

Biden was decrepit.
Hunter Biden's laptop story was buried.
Inflation was in fact transitory.
Vaccine's absolutely prevents virus infection and transmission.
The border was deliberately opened when they abandoned the "stay in mexico policy"

So you got 3 out of 5 correct.

4 out of 5 correct. The Covid vaccine reduces the severity of symptoms; that’s it. You can most definitely still get and transmit it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol at the crying liberals on this board who no longer count on Zuckerberg to squash speech.

Misinformation isn’t speech, a$$wipe.

Yes it is. It absolutely is, because who decides what is misinformation?

I’m old enough to remember when women claimed that the Covid vaccine was messing with their menstruation and it was censored and labeled misinformation.

Turned out to be true!

Cite your sources

DP

My uterus is MY source. After my 2nd Moderna shot in 2021, I skipped two periods, then had short duration periods every 14-16 days, for several months.

That was some scary sh*t.

LOL "scary sht". I can see why no one took you seriously.

Let’s see if you believe in science. Linked is a study by NIH that shows the Covid vaccine caused menstrual issues.

Menstrual abnormalities after COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9683843/#:~:text=Conclusion,menorrhagia%2C%20metrorrhagia%2C%20and%20polymenorrhea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:That didn’t take long. Say goodbye to fact checkers.

Biased Fact checkers.......there, I fixed it for ya.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol at the crying liberals on this board who no longer count on Zuckerberg to squash speech.

Misinformation isn’t speech, a$$wipe.

Yes it is. It absolutely is, because who decides what is misinformation?

I’m old enough to remember when women claimed that the Covid vaccine was messing with their menstruation and it was censored and labeled misinformation.

Turned out to be true!

Cite your sources

DP

My uterus is MY source. After my 2nd Moderna shot in 2021, I skipped two periods, then had short duration periods every 14-16 days, for several months.

That was some scary sh*t.

LOL "scary sht". I can see why no one took you seriously.

All of my children have been born in my 30s and my fertility is extremely important to me. If I was having issues that impacted my fertility, I would be scared too. To be lied to on top of it adds insult to injury. To then have to deal with tremendous a-holes such as yourself - you are part of what’s wrong with modern society. Something is seriously wrong with you. Perhaps you should take a moment to reflect.
-NP

DP. Then maybe PP should've looked closer at her hormones who were very likely the culprit, and not a random vaccine.

The vaccine has been associated with changes in menstrual cycle duration and heavier bleeding.

So has Covid...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol at the crying liberals on this board who no longer count on Zuckerberg to squash speech.

Misinformation isn’t speech, a$$wipe.

Yes it is. It absolutely is, because who decides what is misinformation?

I’m old enough to remember when women claimed that the Covid vaccine was messing with their menstruation and it was censored and labeled misinformation.

Turned out to be true!

Cite your sources

DP

My uterus is MY source. After my 2nd Moderna shot in 2021, I skipped two periods, then had short duration periods every 14-16 days, for several months.

That was some scary sh*t.

LOL "scary sht". I can see why no one took you seriously.

All of my children have been born in my 30s and my fertility is extremely important to me. If I was having issues that impacted my fertility, I would be scared too. To be lied to on top of it adds insult to injury. To then have to deal with tremendous a-holes such as yourself - you are part of what’s wrong with modern society. Something is seriously wrong with you. Perhaps you should take a moment to reflect.
-NP

Why would you assume that a temporary disruption to menstruation is a threat to fertility? All kinds of stressors can do this. It doesn’t make a woman infertile.

People who tried to tie vaccine related disruptions in mensuration (which I am not denying; it makes sense that they happened) to infertility was trying to scare women for political points.

Get a better science education so you aren’t so easily manipulated.

Wrong. The issue was that when women started speaking up about the changes in their cycles that they were experiencing, their concerns were discounted just like that first follow up did did to the original poster talking about her period. Science is about being open to hypotheses and then testing them, not insisting that women’s stories were hormones right off the bat. That silencing is exactly what the problem was and THAT is what has led to manipulation and lack of trust.

Here’s a crazy idea… stop caring what people on SOCIAL MEDIA are saying and talk to your DOCTOR. They would have provided reassurance that weird cycles are not something to be all freaked out over unless they persist for a much longer time than whatever the vaccine did for some women. Even if you were super consistent leading up to that. Why would anyone rely on social media for medical information? Why would some anecdotes on social media carry more weight than population level data that your doctor can cite to help you understand that a stressor to the body can throw off cycles for a few months?

If you understood more about your own bodies you wouldn’t have been running to breathlessly post about this like it’s some conspiracy.

It’s actually embarrassing. The whole thing was so overwrought then and it is now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:lol at the crying liberals on this board who no longer count on Zuckerberg to squash speech.

Misinformation isn’t speech, a$$wipe.

Yes it is. It absolutely is, because who decides what is misinformation?

I’m old enough to remember when women claimed that the Covid vaccine was messing with their menstruation and it was censored and labeled misinformation.

Turned out to be true!

Cite your sources

DP

My uterus is MY source. After my 2nd Moderna shot in 2021, I skipped two periods, then had short duration periods every 14-16 days, for several months.

That was some scary sh*t.

LOL "scary sht". I can see why no one took you seriously.

All of my children have been born in my 30s and my fertility is extremely important to me. If I was having issues that impacted my fertility, I would be scared too. To be lied to on top of it adds insult to injury. To then have to deal with tremendous a-holes such as yourself - you are part of what’s wrong with modern society. Something is seriously wrong with you. Perhaps you should take a moment to reflect.
-NP

Why would you assume that a temporary disruption to menstruation is a threat to fertility? All kinds of stressors can do this. It doesn’t make a woman infertile.

People who tried to tie vaccine related disruptions in mensuration (which I am not denying; it makes sense that they happened) to infertility was trying to scare women for political points.

Get a better science education so you aren’t so easily manipulated.

Wrong. The issue was that when women started speaking up about the changes in their cycles that they were experiencing, their concerns were discounted just like that first follow up did did to the original poster talking about her period. Science is about being open to hypotheses and then testing them, not insisting that women’s stories were hormones right off the bat. That silencing is exactly what the problem was and THAT is what has led to manipulation and lack of trust.

Here’s a crazy idea… stop caring what people on SOCIAL MEDIA are saying and talk to your DOCTOR. They would have provided reassurance that weird cycles are not something to be all freaked out over unless they persist for a much longer time than whatever the vaccine did for some women. Even if you were super consistent leading up to that. Why would anyone rely on social media for medical information? Why would some anecdotes on social media carry more weight than population level data that your doctor can cite to help you understand that a stressor to the body can throw off cycles for a few months?

If you understood more about your own bodies you wouldn’t have been running to breathlessly post about this like it’s some conspiracy.

It’s actually embarrassing. The whole thing was so overwrought then and it is now.

Aren’t we talking about censorship on social media?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will liberals be hating on Mark Zuckerberg like they hate Elon Musk for not going along with their censorship of conservatives?

I'm an Independent who thinks misinformation and conspiracy theories are going to ruin this country.

Misinformation like Biden is spry and runs circles around his young aides?

Or Hunters laptop is Russian propaganda

Or inflation is just transitory?

Or the covid vaccine will stop you from getting and transmitting the virus?

Or the border is secure?

Biden was decrepit.
Hunter Biden's laptop story was buried.
Inflation was in fact transitory.
Vaccine's absolutely prevents virus infection and transmission.
The border was deliberately opened when they abandoned the "stay in mexico policy"

So you got 3 out of 5 correct.

4 out of 5 correct. The Covid vaccine reduces the severity of symptoms; that’s it. You can most definitely still get and transmit it.

That's how ALL vaccines work, isn't it?
They gives you the antibodies to fight off virus, don't they?
I get a measles vaccine and i can still get measles.
I get a flu vaccine and i can still get the flu.
It's easier for me to fight it off because I have anti-bodies ready to go but vaccination is not immunization, is it?