| Most teachers are not very strict or no nonsense and very very few will work with parents to address the issues. Admin are generally useless. |
They want to know what's going on in their own school but you may never follow up with parents. |
*They. Meaning they want to know the issues you or your kid has heard, seen or experienced (usually they already know what the issues are), but they may never follow up to let you know how they resolved the issue or didn't resolve the issue. |
Ridiculous. There is an actual Away All Day cell phone pilot going on in MCPS that any school could have joined |
Elementary teacher here and it’s unbelievable. It wasn’t like this in 2005 when I started teaching. Now…there is no respect for me or the classmates, and they talk all day long. No teaching or learning occurs. It’s bad, honestly, parents need to know how bad it is… |
No- my MCPS HS freshman has rarely been unable to finish work because of other students talking. However, some teachers are definitely more strict than others and are able to keep the students chatter to minimum. Also the teachers that require a lot of student participation -fare much better- as most students have to pay attention. For my DD- those classes include. But are not limited to H Eng, AP Gov, Spanish, H Bio. A lot of work is happening in Math( Alg 2) so not sure if students can chat nonstop. According to her, a lot of seniors in her class will sit in the back and chat but not too loud and not disruptive. |
Not completely true. I am POC and my child goes to a 90 % white MCPS school in an affluent area. guess what- same issues in these school too- majority of kids getting into trouble or getting detention are white students. The school is still not able to control it. So pls stop with the racist card everytime. |
Exactly. |
| If a cellphone is taken a kid might attack because these kids are trained to know that there are no consequences and they can do no wrong. |
We are not very strict because when we try to establish rules, we get nasty emails from parents. Why didn't I let little Jimmy out to use the bathroom every class period with his friends. Why didn't I allow little Jimmy to turn in his paper? (well there is a class turn in bin, that he didn't know about because he spends all of his time in the bathroom). When we contact home about concerns parents ignore us or sides with their child. I pretty much have stopped calling home because it is just a waste of time. Time that I don't have. It took us 3 months to get one parent to return phone calls. This one student disrupted 7 classes each and everyday. It had an impact on the classroom culture. We could barely get through a quarter of a lesson because of his behavior. 20+ other students had to deal with his behavior. It had an impact on my mental health. 3 months! How can parents just ignore the school? |
| So we have to pilot a common sense rule of being an average student who pays attention. What happens if students riot and become violent over the rule limiting their addiction source. Do we scrap the pilot and we go back to allowing the kids to disregard everything as we inflate their grades and allow them to pass through by sitting in a chair for a decade on the pool phone, producing no work or evidence of learning, and call them honor students with 4.75 gpas |
My DC told me that some teachers only teach for about 15-20 minute, then assign work for students to complete during class. Students end up on their phone or chatting with each other. |
This is actually a rather accepted strategy. Teachers directly teach, and then provide time for students to complete guided practice. If students have questions, the teacher is there to address it. This also provides teachers with an opportunity to work individually with students, which can’t happen if teachers lecture for the entire period. If the students are talking or playing on their phones, then they are not using the class time as it is intended. Perhaps it’s time to hold students more accountable for their own behavior instead of putting 100% of the responsibility on the overworked teacher. |
|
[quote=Anonymous
This is actually a rather accepted strategy. Teachers directly teach, and then provide time for students to complete guided practice. If students have questions, the teacher is there to address it. This also provides teachers with an opportunity to work individually with students, which can’t happen if teachers lecture for the entire period. If the students are talking or playing on their phones, then they are not using the class time as it is intended. Perhaps it’s time to hold students more accountable for their own behavior instead of putting 100% of the responsibility on the overworked teacher. Yes, exactly. Holding students more accountable for their own behavior would allow teachers to focus more on teaching during valuable class time! Students who want to learn can actually learn more! But often these students find the in class assignments too easy or finish them quickly, then they idle around. It would be nice if teachers can design materials that cater to students at different levels. That’s a lot of work though. |
Yes, exactly. Holding students more accountable for their own behavior would allow teachers to focus more on teaching during valuable class time! Students who want to learn can actually learn more! But often these students find the in class assignments too easy or finish them quickly, then they idle around. It would be nice if teachers can design materials that cater to students at different levels. That’s a lot of work though. And we would be able to do that if we had time. As it is, I spend every evening barely finding time to plan one lesson with modifications for students with IEPs and 504s. I would love to find time to further differentiate lessons by ability and interest, but at 65+ hour weeks already I just don’t have the time. But if I got time AT work to plan? I can only imagine how tremendous that would be. |