Kamala Harris owns a gun. Are you surprised or mad?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does Trump own a gun? We know his sons do, but what about him?

Goodness. As a felon, I certainly hope not!

He is not a convicted felon as that term is used in the law that prohibits gun ownership or handling. That only comes after he is sentenced. That case is not going to make it through the appeals court. So it will all come back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I actually am one of those liberals that Fox News is constantly warning about. I hate all guns and I would love for the government to confiscate them all. I think the only people who should have them are police and military.

I’m enthusiastically voting for Harris, but yes, I am a little disappointed that she’s a gun owner. But obviously she’s a responsible one and I get that it’s politically expedient for her to have one. So whatever.

She has a gun because she has needed one. Once a prosecutor you face lots of threats. She thinks people have been coming to kill her. And she would be right as this happens all the time to DAs. Get real.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dear, right-wing gun "enthusiasts":

Most people on the left have no problem with gun ownership, but want stricter background checks and also see no point in any civilian owning a military-grade weapon. Your Rambo fantasies of taking on the govt, would end the moment some 20yo in Quantico, sitting at a screen, eating lunch, sent a drone and decimated your entire neighborhood.

Harris supports gun confiscation, mandatory sale to the government.

Keep trying, lyin’ MAGA sh*tbag!

DP

That’s NOT a lie. It’s in her campaign platform. That’s one of the biggest reasons many people whom I know support her, support her.

Because she has PROMISED that she will do gun confiscation. If she doesn’t, she may be a 1-term president herself. She made a promise. She damn well better keep it and do confiscation.

BULLSHIT. You can’t “do" “gun confiscation,” moron. Firearms are legal. There are 400 million of them in the U.S. No one’s coming for your guns, idiot.

It is not confiscating that will be effective . we put resources to buy back programs and then stop selling the assault weapons. It is accomplished with money if we are serious that we want to get rid of certain weapons.

We will start with the assault rifles first. Then it will be easier to gradually move on to other types, until we eventually get rid of every last one.

Nonsense.

[Anonymous]

I’m not surprised. She had so many death threats when she was running for VP. It was crazy!

[Anonymous]

Not surprised or mad. Don’t care, actually.

- democrat

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lots of Dems own guns. Biden owns a gun; Walz owns a gun.

Most Dems aren't against gun ownership, but rather against assault rifles and the easy access to guns.

+1
I’m pretty fine with handguns and hunting rifles being widely owned coupled with strong red flag and background check laws.
I wish we would ban anything similar to what might be used by a soldier in combat.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She doesn’t own a gun. She is an extreme anti-gun liberal. That line was something her team coached her to say in order to pretend that she’s not calling for mandatory gun buybacks.

Maybe they had her actually buy one?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’m not surprised. She had so many death threats when she was running for VP. It was crazy!

Who was arrested for these death threats?

Political candidates and elected officials all get death threats.

Trump was just shot and almost killed. A man sitting behind him was shot in the head and killed. 2 more men at the rally were critically injured. That’s really crazy. I don’t know why the moderators at the ABC debate didn’t have a question about that situation. It’s a historic moment.

[Anonymous]

Yeah maybe she should pull it out and wave it in the air at her next campaign rally.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I actually am one of those liberals that Fox News is constantly warning about. I hate all guns and I would love for the government to confiscate them all. I think the only people who should have them are police and military.

I’m enthusiastically voting for Harris, but yes, I am a little disappointed that she’s a gun owner. But obviously she’s a responsible one and I get that it’s politically expedient for her to have one. So whatever.

She has a gun because she has needed one. Once a prosecutor you face lots of threats. She thinks people have been coming to kill her. And she would be right as this happens all the time to DAs. Get real.

So only special government employees should have guns?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of Dems own guns. Biden owns a gun; Walz owns a gun.

Most Dems aren't against gun ownership, but rather against assault rifles and the easy access to guns.

+1
I’m pretty fine with handguns and hunting rifles being widely owned coupled with strong red flag and background check laws.
I wish we would ban anything similar to what might be used by a soldier in combat.

Like any handgun ever made? Those guns that might be used by a soldier?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I actually am one of those liberals that Fox News is constantly warning about. I hate all guns and I would love for the government to confiscate them all. I think the only people who should have them are police and military.

I’m enthusiastically voting for Harris, but yes, I am a little disappointed that she’s a gun owner. But obviously she’s a responsible one and I get that it’s politically expedient for her to have one. So whatever.

One of the few honest replies.

See, this is your problem. You want to believe this one post and ignoring all of the others, because that's what it is to be a conservative gun nut. Your only "validation" is being seen as victims of the "woke/DEI/commie/cancel culture/ blah blah blah" left when you aren't. You claimed Obama was going to take your guns, he didn't. You claimed Biden would. He hasn't.

You want to believe every Dem gives a damn about you simply owning hand guns or a rifle. The majority believe you have no business owning an AR. You're not using it for hunting (there would be nothing left of your kill). There's something seriously wrong with someone desperate to own them.

You do realize that AR-15s are varmint guns, don’t you. They would be used to take care of animals like coyotes that are threatening a farmer’s livestock. An AR-15 while lethal is actually a very under powered weapon for hunting. Much less powerful that a .308 or 30.6 which are more traditionally used to hunt deer or other larger game.

[Anonymous]

31% of Democratic households own a gun. The idea that Democrats want to ban guns is a fiction the NRA created to prevent sensible gun control.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I actually am one of those liberals that Fox News is constantly warning about. I hate all guns and I would love for the government to confiscate them all. I think the only people who should have them are police and military.

I’m enthusiastically voting for Harris, but yes, I am a little disappointed that she’s a gun owner. But obviously she’s a responsible one and I get that it’s politically expedient for her to have one. So whatever.

One of the few honest replies.

See, this is your problem. You want to believe this one post and ignoring all of the others, because that's what it is to be a conservative gun nut. Your only "validation" is being seen as victims of the "woke/DEI/commie/cancel culture/ blah blah blah" left when you aren't. You claimed Obama was going to take your guns, he didn't. You claimed Biden would. He hasn't.

You want to believe every Dem gives a damn about you simply owning hand guns or a rifle. The majority believe you have no business owning an AR. You're not using it for hunting (there would be nothing left of your kill). There's something seriously wrong with someone desperate to own them.

You do realize that AR-15s are varmint guns, don’t you. They would be used to take care of animals like coyotes that are threatening a farmer’s livestock. An AR-15 while lethal is actually a very under powered weapon for hunting. Much less powerful that a .308 or 30.6 which are more traditionally used to hunt deer or other larger game.

Varmint guns OMG. Farmers handled coyotes with rifles for generations.

We can agree that if someone shows a legitimate need to fight back packs of coyotes, they can get a special AR-15 permit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of Dems own guns. Biden owns a gun; Walz owns a gun.

Most Dems aren't against gun ownership, but rather against assault rifles and the easy access to guns.

This. I have zero problem with handguns, hunting rifles, dueling pistols, whatever.

I have a huge problem with assault rifles being so easily accessible that even teenagers can get their hands on one. There is no good reason to have an assault rifle. It is not a defensive weapon. It cannot be used to hunt. It is good for nothing but mass murder. A ban on assault rifles is supported by the vast majority of Americans. It is not an extreme position at all.

There is no such thing as an assault rifle. Why are democrats so uninformed and downright dumb when it comes to firearms?

Why would one need to know the difference beyond the basics? How about you simply sum up why you need the type of f***ing weapon that you couldn't use for actual hunting or protecting your family? Why do you need more than handguns and hunting rifles? Explain why you need the type of weapon that allows for 100 rounds a second? What kind of psycho needs that and considers it normal?

It is a legit defense weapon. Sorry but it is.

Lots of weapons are "legit defense weapons". You don't live in a movie. There is no elite strike team rappelling down from helicopters to breach your house from all sides. You don't need an AR-15 to do the job.