Kamala Harris owns a gun. Are you surprised or mad?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dear, right-wing gun "enthusiasts":

Most people on the left have no problem with gun ownership, but want stricter background checks and also see no point in any civilian owning a military-grade weapon. Your Rambo fantasies of taking on the govt, would end the moment some 20yo in Quantico, sitting at a screen, eating lunch, sent a drone and decimated your entire neighborhood.

Harris supports gun confiscation, mandatory sale to the government.

Keep trying, lyin’ MAGA sh*tbag!

DP

That’s NOT a lie. It’s in her campaign platform. That’s one of the biggest reasons many people whom I know support her, support her.

Because she has PROMISED that she will do gun confiscation. If she doesn’t, she may be a 1-term president herself. She made a promise. She damn well better keep it and do confiscation.

BULLSHIT. You can’t “do" “gun confiscation,” moron. Firearms are legal. There are 400 million of them in the U.S. No one’s coming for your guns, idiot.

It is not confiscating that will be effective . we put resources to buy back programs and then stop selling the assault weapons. It is accomplished with money if we are serious that we want to get rid of certain weapons.

We will start with the assault rifles first. Then it will be easier to gradually move on to other types, until we eventually get rid of every last one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Lots of Dems own guns. Biden owns a gun; Walz owns a gun.

Most Dems aren't against gun ownership, but rather against assault rifles and the easy access to guns.

Assault rifles have been banned for decades here. Get educated before you spout your misinformed nonsense.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I'm not surprised nor mad.

Does she stockpile guns? Did she purchase them legally? Did she have proper training? Does she store them responsibly? Does she have crazy machine gun like weapons that no civilian ever needs?

The details matter. She also supports reasonable, responsible gun legislation, so I'm not the least bit bothered as a non-gun owner.

“ crazy machine guns”. Tell me you know know nothing about firearms lol

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dear, right-wing gun "enthusiasts":

Most people on the left have no problem with gun ownership, but want stricter background checks and also see no point in any civilian owning a military-grade weapon. Your Rambo fantasies of taking on the govt, would end the moment some 20yo in Quantico, sitting at a screen, eating lunch, sent a drone and decimated your entire neighborhood.

“ military grade weapon”. Don’t think you’re schooling anyone with your very stupid and misinformed nonsense.

Newflash for all the dumb liberals who can’t put two brain cells together:

Civilians do not have access to weapons of war, nor is an AR-15 a weapon of war.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does Trump own a gun? We know his sons do, but what about him?

Do they even know how to shot?

I don't his son ever shot before 2016.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don’t have any problem with handguns or hunting rifles stored safely and managed responsibly. I think most sane people would agree. The unique issue in our country is the worship of firearms and the ability for ordinary citizens to own machine guns.

Just how many people do you think have these? Sale has been banned for decades.

The PP means semi-automatic long guns with extended clips. Mass shooters just looooovvveee extended clips. If you want to kill a lot of people, quickly, extended clips are a must-have. But Mass shooters can always count on Republicans for support, so all is well and nothing changes. MAGA!

Thoughts-n-Prayers,
-Democrat gun owner.

Most mass shooting are committed with a handgun, not a rifle. The biggest school shooting was done with 2 handguns.

[Anonymous]

I'd be surprised if a prosecutor wasn't a gun owner.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If you want gun control, ask a black friend to open carry.

Many black people do open and carry. They are fine.

[Anonymous]

Not surprised. I imagine she bought one whenever the idea of running for prez came to her. Took some lessons. Now has a fun. Not a bad idea.

[Anonymous]

[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of Dems own guns. Biden owns a gun; Walz owns a gun.

Most Dems aren't against gun ownership, but rather against assault rifles and the easy access to guns.

This. I have zero problem with handguns, hunting rifles, dueling pistols, whatever.

I have a huge problem with assault rifles being so easily accessible that even teenagers can get their hands on one. There is no good reason to have an assault rifle. It is not a defensive weapon. It cannot be used to hunt. It is good for nothing but mass murder. A ban on assault rifles is supported by the vast majority of Americans. It is not an extreme position at all.

There is no such thing as an assault rifle. Why are democrats so uninformed and downright dumb when it comes to firearms?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Does it change your view of gun ownership or of Kamala Harris?

No to both.

I don't want to ban guns. I want gun control and a ban on assault weapons (like the one we used to have - it worked!). I want it to be a felony if your minor child obtains access to a gun and harms themself or others. These are not radical ideas. I like target shooting with a handgun myself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of Dems own guns. Biden owns a gun; Walz owns a gun.

Most Dems aren't against gun ownership, but rather against assault rifles and the easy access to guns.

This. I have zero problem with handguns, hunting rifles, dueling pistols, whatever.

I have a huge problem with assault rifles being so easily accessible that even teenagers can get their hands on one. There is no good reason to have an assault rifle. It is not a defensive weapon. It cannot be used to hunt. It is good for nothing but mass murder. A ban on assault rifles is supported by the vast majority of Americans. It is not an extreme position at all.

There is no such thing as an assault rifle. Why are democrats so uninformed and downright dumb when it comes to firearms?

Why would one need to know the difference beyond the basics? How about you simply sum up why you need the type of f***ing weapon that you couldn't use for actual hunting or protecting your family? Why do you need more than handguns and hunting rifles? Explain why you need the type of weapon that allows for 100 rounds a second? What kind of psycho needs that and considers it normal?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dear, right-wing gun "enthusiasts":

Most people on the left have no problem with gun ownership, but want stricter background checks and also see no point in any civilian owning a military-grade weapon. Your Rambo fantasies of taking on the govt, would end the moment some 20yo in Quantico, sitting at a screen, eating lunch, sent a drone and decimated your entire neighborhood.

“ military grade weapon”. Don’t think you’re schooling anyone with your very stupid and misinformed nonsense.

Newflash for all the dumb liberals who can’t put two brain cells together:

Civilians do not have access to weapons of war, nor is an AR-15 a weapon of war.

There is not a single military that would use an AR-15. It is not a military grade weapon.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:[twitter]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Lots of Dems own guns. Biden owns a gun; Walz owns a gun.

Most Dems aren't against gun ownership, but rather against assault rifles and the easy access to guns.

This. I have zero problem with handguns, hunting rifles, dueling pistols, whatever.

I have a huge problem with assault rifles being so easily accessible that even teenagers can get their hands on one. There is no good reason to have an assault rifle. It is not a defensive weapon. It cannot be used to hunt. It is good for nothing but mass murder. A ban on assault rifles is supported by the vast majority of Americans. It is not an extreme position at all.

There is no such thing as an assault rifle. Why are democrats so uninformed and downright dumb when it comes to firearms?

Why would one need to know the difference beyond the basics? How about you simply sum up why you need the type of f***ing weapon that you couldn't use for actual hunting or protecting your family? Why do you need more than handguns and hunting rifles? Explain why you need the type of weapon that allows for 100 rounds a second? What kind of psycho needs that and considers it normal?

It is a legit defense weapon. Sorry but it is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dear, right-wing gun "enthusiasts":

Most people on the left have no problem with gun ownership, but want stricter background checks and also see no point in any civilian owning a military-grade weapon. Your Rambo fantasies of taking on the govt, would end the moment some 20yo in Quantico, sitting at a screen, eating lunch, sent a drone and decimated your entire neighborhood.

Harris supports gun confiscation, mandatory sale to the government.

Keep trying, lyin’ MAGA sh*tbag!

DP

That’s NOT a lie. It’s in her campaign platform. That’s one of the biggest reasons many people whom I know support her, support her.

Because she has PROMISED that she will do gun confiscation. If she doesn’t, she may be a 1-term president herself. She made a promise. She damn well better keep it and do confiscation.

BULLSHIT. You can’t “do" “gun confiscation,” moron. Firearms are legal. There are 400 million of them in the U.S. No one’s coming for your guns, idiot.

It is not confiscating that will be effective . we put resources to buy back programs and then stop selling the assault weapons. It is accomplished with money if we are serious that we want to get rid of certain weapons.

We will start with the assault rifles first. Then it will be easier to gradually move on to other types, until we eventually get rid of every last one.

No you will not. First -- the so-called assault rifles will keep being sold and there will be no restrictions. Why? Votes are not there in Congress and will not be. In any event cannot under Second Amendment. There will be no change in Sup Ct for 20 years. In the next 20 years, at least half the time will have republican presidents so no I doubt this will change. Even if none of that mattered there are too many guns out there to make even a slightly meaningful dent.

What we could do is enhanced background checks, create a red flag system, enhanced firearms training, enhanced enforcement of gun violations, better protect schools -- all that could be done by Harris in the first year if she wanted to as president.