Putting all my money in nvda

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The scared can worry about risk and we'll keep counting our money with our individual stock investments. In my IRA, I've beat the S&P 500 Index by 40% over the last 5 years with my portfolio that has been invested in 3 or 4 stocks.

The dunning kruger is strong in this one.

Ok

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The scared can worry about risk and we'll keep counting our money with our individual stock investments. In my IRA, I've beat the S&P 500 Index by 40% over the last 5 years with my portfolio that has been invested in 3 or 4 stocks.

The dunning kruger is strong in this one.

I’m the OP and I’m smarter than you financially. Had to look up dunning Kruger cause I had no idea what it meant. You sound like one of these useless DC Ivy League grads.

[Anonymous]

I just googled Dunning Kruger and I still don't get it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:made $10M+ with NVDA over two years and still holding.

At least make the lie believable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I did this with Apple too. From 2008 to 2016 or so I only bought Apple stock and it was basically 100% of my portfolio.
Even with selling shares over the years for big purchases I still have 25,000 or so shares. I always joke that Apple stock
has made my life possible. After Apple, I started putting chunks of money into AMZN and that's done well too.

I am now doing the same with NVDA. So far I've accumulated 2,500 shares. If I had $300,000, it would definitely all
go into NVDA.

Someone who puts a lot of their money into one or two stocks is someone with little sense or have other a huge safety net or wealth where they can tolerate the risk.

Lehman, BlackBerry, Enron, Sears — many unstoppable companies suddenly pivot to distress. Look at Intel and HP is probably another example. At one point Cisco was the most valuable company… it goes on and on.

Laws have changed since. We have info and tools that make it harder to lose move and easier to get out. I'm in few stocks, but not for years and year. The chances of me holding the stock that is about to go zero, are 0.01, and even then, there's stop loss.
World has moved on. Move with the world.

You don’t understand how stop loss orders work for retail investors and order queuing. You can wake up with the stock down 75% and your order opens in the morning and the money is gone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I did this with Apple too. From 2008 to 2016 or so I only bought Apple stock and it was basically 100% of my portfolio.
Even with selling shares over the years for big purchases I still have 25,000 or so shares. I always joke that Apple stock
has made my life possible. After Apple, I started putting chunks of money into AMZN and that's done well too.

I am now doing the same with NVDA. So far I've accumulated 2,500 shares. If I had $300,000, it would definitely all
go into NVDA.

Someone who puts a lot of their money into one or two stocks is someone with little sense or have other a huge safety net or wealth where they can tolerate the risk.

Lehman, BlackBerry, Enron, Sears — many unstoppable companies suddenly pivot to distress. Look at Intel and HP is probably another example. At one point Cisco was the most valuable company… it goes on and on.

Laws have changed since. We have info and tools that make it harder to lose move and easier to get out. I'm in few stocks, but not for years and year. The chances of me holding the stock that is about to go zero, are 0.01, and even then, there's stop loss.
World has moved on. Move with the world.

You don’t understand how stop loss orders work for retail investors and order queuing. You can wake up with the stock down 75% and your order opens in the morning and the money is gone.

There is after hours trading. I'm probably not in the stock while there have been so many bad signs. Some of you must be holding on to them long term. I don't. Getting in and out lowers the risk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I did this with Apple too. From 2008 to 2016 or so I only bought Apple stock and it was basically 100% of my portfolio.
Even with selling shares over the years for big purchases I still have 25,000 or so shares. I always joke that Apple stock
has made my life possible. After Apple, I started putting chunks of money into AMZN and that's done well too.

I am now doing the same with NVDA. So far I've accumulated 2,500 shares. If I had $300,000, it would definitely all
go into NVDA.

Someone who puts a lot of their money into one or two stocks is someone with little sense or have other a huge safety net or wealth where they can tolerate the risk.

Lehman, BlackBerry, Enron, Sears — many unstoppable companies suddenly pivot to distress. Look at Intel and HP is probably another example. At one point Cisco was the most valuable company… it goes on and on.

Laws have changed since. We have info and tools that make it harder to lose move and easier to get out. I'm in few stocks, but not for years and year. The chances of me holding the stock that is about to go zero, are 0.01, and even then, there's stop loss.
World has moved on. Move with the world.

You don’t understand how stop loss orders work for retail investors and order queuing. You can wake up with the stock down 75% and your order opens in the morning and the money is gone.

There is after hours trading. I'm probably not in the stock while there have been so many bad signs. Some of you must be holding on to them long term. I don't. Getting in and out lowers the risk.

So the new paradigm for success is to trade frequently and try to time the market; holding long term is for success.

Michael Barry actually suggests that is true, because we are overinvested in index funds and the market is all “dumb money”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:made $10M+ with NVDA over two years and still holding.

At least make the lie believable.

Okay if you say so.