+1 Cook well and eat at home. Invite friends over for a "night out" and do dinner that way---potluck or one person cooks and switch where you go each week. Then drinks are much much cheaper at home. I can make excellent cocktails for 6 people for what one costs in DC restaurants/bars. A good $40 bottle of wine is not $100-120, it's only $40. |
| When I was in grad school I lived on $300/month after I paid for rent/utilities/car. That included all my groceries, clothes and eating out. Even if you tripled that it would be $900, not $2k! |
Yes poor people eat $700 a month per person of rice and beans. That is the definition of poor. You and OP are having a difficult time acknowledging you live beyond your means, and both of your means are in no sense of the word poor. |
| Get a room mate in a 2 bed room. You’re too poor to be living in a 1 br paying 2100 |
I imagine for a poor person on the spectrum happily living in a basement studio, everyone else is living beyond their means. OP is not incurring debt, so he can't be living beyond his means. He's not saving as much as he hopes to, which is different from living beyond his means. Your attitude is not one of frugality, it's one of being poor with no money, or living like someone with no money. If you are the person who boasted about never making more than 40k in your life, I can see where your experiences are coming from. You haven't figured out the opportunity costs of some of the advice given to OP, which is telling him to have no social life and not to enjoy any of life's little pleasures. I do agree, as I have always made clear, that there is scope for cutting back on spending in the form of takeaways and doordash. But other than those things his expenditures are not unrealistic nor extravagant for a single person in his mid 30s trying to have a decent life with some comforts in the DC area, in other words, a middle class existence. He is a working stiff in a high cost region and 100k isn't what it was 10 years ago. He rents, so he didn't benefit from buying a house 10 years ago the way some of you did. He's single so he doesn't benefit from the economies of scale that comes from a relationship, affecting both household expenses and groceries. The best real advice given to OP is to find a higher paying job. That's how people get ahead, not by being superfrugal. |
He could benefit if he got a roommate. That's an easy way to cut housing costs way down. |
Bet if he shopped he could cut that car insurance in half. Could also save money on the phone bill with Mint Mobile. Finally cut cable and get Netflix/Hulu and maybe one other package like HBO would also save a decent amount. In total a few hundred dollars of savings from these painless cuts. A little more effort but I think the food bill could be trimmed easily too. |
Exactly. You just don't know how to manage yourself. Door dash? Eating out? You need to learn how to eat and cook at home. |
|
OP: I am barely saving any money living a middle class lifestyle while making 100K a year.
DCUM: Have you thought about adopting the lifestyle of an impoverished hermit to save 3 more dollars? In all seriousness, you're right OP. 100K isn't what it used to be. You need to make more money to get everything you want. Alternatively, you'll need to cut back on fun stuff for yourself to afford fun stuff for a family. That said, saving 10K a year for retirement and 300 a month is perfectly fine. Put it in a retirement calculator and you'll see that you'll get to live a fine life at age 65 with social security. Regarding buying a house, it's not really worth it to buy a house nowadays. The price to income ratio is ridiculously high, meaning that prices can't really get higher and you're a lot better off renting. C'est la vie. |
Agree with this assessment. It’s not that your income is too low. It’s that your choices have you living beyond your means. You don’t need a $2100/month apartment when you can have a roommate and cut that nearly in half. Or get a studio for $1800 that has a washer dryer down the hall instead of in the apartment. Basically you need to look for some ways to cut some expenses so that you can save some money. You’re indulging. Eat at home. Don’t buy new clothes every month or even every other month. Just replenish basics twice a year—once for winter and once for summer. |
The mistake comes in misunderstanding what a middle class lifestyle is. What OP is describing is not working poor, it's middle class. |
Maybe the real mistake is people taking things literally. I'm sure the OP didn't really mean he was impoverished. But he is expressing a common frustration these days, that a good salary on paper is barely enough to live a decent middle class life. |
I had a feeling that someone will consider my life miserable. I don't think it is. I have been to EU 10 times, Miami 6 times, Orlando and Disney 3 times I think(not my favorite), Key West 3 times, Puerto Rico, Kansas City, NY. I thing I've traveled a lot more than most Americans. I take a lot of time off to do whatever. I bought a new car. that I paid off early and two home. I live normal life. Well, I hope he won't get a pet. He is just really bad at budgeting. And working over 45 hours isn't a big deal for a young person without kids. He has to do it only for a year or two. His $100k he can make and invest into invest into would get him out this paycheck to paycheck thing. It's not complicated. By the way, Paris is still nicer than Amsterdam. Been to both twice in my miserable poor life. Also, I'm working on my next $100k using $100k. I know it takes some work, but again, he'd learn a lot. Remember, first $100k is hard because you most likely working for it, second one is much easier. |
| I see nothing unusual about the op’s situation. I think he could probably squeeze another $500 a month out or get a room mate. I would probably be in a similar situation if I wasn’t married and having a 2nd income there. |
| We should close this thread and put a sticky saying “no, 100k a year is not ‘working poor’ “ |