$20 minimum wage for fast food workers in California….thoughts?

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Seems to me those businesses will just pass on those higher labor costs in the prices of their food and then the cycle begins all over again. Fast food preparation is unskilled labor.


It’s unskilled labor that’s why minimum wage will be set at $20 for California. Low enough based on the skill needed for the job, high enough for people to take and keep the jobs.

It’s been too long that fast food conglomerates have gotten away with advertised 99 cent burgers and paid workers $6 an hour. Raise the prices of the food. Plus do you really want an underpaid worker who has only been there a week and isn’t planning to stay so there’s a constant turnover of workers who have incentive to stay?


I didn’t see anywhere where those employees were being forced to work for that pay. That’s their choice. If they all move on then the business owners will have to raise wages to keep workers. It’s called capitalism.


Great, let’s bring back child labor, no overtime, health and safety rules. Why even have a minimum wage?


I think child labor, relaxing health and safety rules and no minimum wage are good. Employers do need to pay overtime though.

What overtime? What a joke. There are no breaks during 10-12 hour shift, no paid training, no paychecks for years, paychecks that bounce, and no employer paid extra to meet the minimum wage. I ended up in ER few times from work. Another co-worker collapsed on the street and caught a cab to ER; all work related. This was in the late 90s and early 2000s in DC in restaurant business.
Right after 9/11 I made about $30 a night after 10 hour shift in tips. No employer was required to make up the difference to meet minimum. I remember crying and making a martini as he owed me 40 h a week x $2.17 an hour x 10 weeks. My very first job never even paid me a penny from the house and kept most of the credit card tips.
That's what you get when there's no contract, no punch in machine, you too poor to get a different job or the different job is just as bad.
All those small business owners were applauded as such heroes/pillars of the community. One went on to open a second restaurant while not paying any of us the $2.27-$2.77 an hour. He saved 100s of thousand of dollars over the years. Not sure how he ran a restaurant without paying workers. He and his buddy were probably the only servers/bartenders on paychecks.
I probably already wrote on this post. Poor people are not even poor because of the lousy pay, but because they don't even get the minimum while ruining their health. They also have poor friends/co-worker around them who constantly need help paying bills. So, poor are in negative as they work and all this without credit cards. Extremely hard to come out of it.
I had two jobs that cost me more to go to work than to stay home. How can this be? Completely normal as the owners don't care.
Those I quite in two months, but two months too late.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I guess no one is bothered that a McDonald's CEO made $17.8 million in 2022 (probably over 20 million in 2024) but here you are bitc51ng about some poor soul making $20/hour. I'm sure he worked THAT much harder than the people he employs.

The way to deal with that is to mandate a ratio between executive and hourly worker pay.

Raising to the minimum wage without doing so is not going to work, as we are seeing in CA. It will just either make the consumer pay for it, or the business will either shut down or let go of more employees, as we are seeing.
Anonymous
It’s going to backfire. Prices are going to go sky high and businesses are going to cut human jobs and put up more kiosks and automated processes. Some will also end up closing up for good. Ultimately people will end up losing jobs.
Anonymous
All for it. Corporations have huge profits and they simply aren't sharing them with workers unless forced to. Time to force them.
Anonymous
Possibly stupid question: why do they make the distinction between minimum wage for "fast-food" and minimum wage for "other low-skill/high turnover" jobs? Why is fast food worth more than, say, retail or factory work?

In any case, the result will be predictable: fewer fast-food jobs (leaving many former employees worse off), more automation, fewer fast-food restaurants, and higher prices (because not all work can be automated).

Anonymous
Corporations have huge profits and they simply aren't sharing them with workers unless forced to.


Corporations are in business to make profits. They aren't charities. They also don't take money away from employees when they lose money. You are welcome to start your own employee-owned fast food restaurant, but that is not what McDonalds, Wendys, Burger King, and the like do.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Corporations have huge profits and they simply aren't sharing them with workers unless forced to.


Corporations are in business to make profits. They aren't charities. They also don't take money away from employees when they lose money. You are welcome to start your own employee-owned fast food restaurant, but that is not what McDonalds, Wendys, Burger King, and the like do.


Setting a minimum wage is the job of the state and the federal government. The government did its job. If McDonalds wants to close restaurants in response, they are free to do so.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Possibly stupid question: why do they make the distinction between minimum wage for "fast-food" and minimum wage for "other low-skill/high turnover" jobs? Why is fast food worth more than, say, retail or factory work?

In any case, the result will be predictable: fewer fast-food jobs (leaving many former employees worse off), more automation, fewer fast-food restaurants, and higher prices (because not all work can be automated).



Fast food jobs are low quality jobs generally in companies that are large. Good sector to target in this labor market where opportunities are many.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It’s going to backfire. Prices are going to go sky high and businesses are going to cut human jobs and put up more kiosks and automated processes. Some will also end up closing up for good. Ultimately people will end up losing jobs.


A kiosk that is cheap than a $20 an hour worker is probably cheaper than a $13 an hour worker.
Anonymous
If the wages are too low then people won't work the jobs but then the govt props those people up with unemployment and welfare, so the govt created a problem of people not wanting to work
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Corporations have huge profits and they simply aren't sharing them with workers unless forced to.


Corporations are in business to make profits. They aren't charities. They also don't take money away from employees when they lose money. You are welcome to start your own employee-owned fast food restaurant, but that is not what McDonalds, Wendys, Burger King, and the like do.


Of course they do. They may not be literally stealing it from their bank accounts but they'll happily slash your hours or let you go with zero notice or severance. If you don't consider that taking money away from employees when they lose money you need to lay off licking the corporate boots.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I guess no one is bothered that a McDonald's CEO made $17.8 million in 2022 (probably over 20 million in 2024) but here you are bitc51ng about some poor soul making $20/hour. I'm sure he worked THAT much harder than the people he employs.


I bet he did. Working fast food isn't exactly hard work. You're busy and on your feet, but it's not hard. And then you go home after your shift. The McDonald's CEO is pretty much always working.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA I have a bridge to sell you too.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Possibly stupid question: why do they make the distinction between minimum wage for "fast-food" and minimum wage for "other low-skill/high turnover" jobs? Why is fast food worth more than, say, retail or factory work?

In any case, the result will be predictable: fewer fast-food jobs (leaving many former employees worse off), more automation, fewer fast-food restaurants, and higher prices (because not all work can be automated).



Not stupid as I have the same question! Why did they single out one sector--food service--and then one specific sub-sector within that sector--fast food? Note that restaurants were not included in this legislation. Is this some subsector by subsector strategy? First health care workers, then fast food workers, then ????
Anonymous
Well, this is how inflation happens. If you're in favor of fast food workers making $20 an hour, you're also in favor of inflation.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Not everyone is meant to earn a livable wage. That doesn’t mean they can’t earn a livable wage. Many of these workers are part time by choice and it’s a supplement to other income.


Are you for real? You don't think working 40 hours / week should be enough to afford basics of life?
post reply Forum Index » Money and Finances
Message Quick Reply
Go to: