Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm reaching out to share a concern and seek your insights. At McLean High School, known for its excellence, we've encountered a situation where our child's performance in two subjects did not improve until we hired private tutors, despite months of trying to work with the teachers. This drastic change from Ds and Fs to As has raised serious questions about the teaching effectiveness and the reliance on external tutoring for academic success.
It's troubling that success in these subjects seems contingent upon additional tutoring, which not all families can afford. This disparity begs the question: Why aren't teachers who consistently underperform held accountable, and how can we ensure all students have equal opportunities to succeed without external help?
I believe it's crucial for our community to discuss these issues and advocate for a fair, high-quality educational experience for all students.
Maybe your child is in classes that they shouldn't be in if they require tutoring and extra hours studying? Not every kid needs to be in AP and Honors classes for every subject. It sound slike your child is capable of doing the work but needs a lot of extra support.
If that was the case why would tutoring fix the situation and same for other peers? Does it seem like a teaching problem?
Most kids with Ds and Fs do not receive those grades because they are doing their best and just don’t understand, they are usually not focused in class, not completing work, etc. Hiring a tutor who sits there to help the student finish assignments raises his grade, but is not an indictment of the teacher. It might be, but you can’t know that from your student’s individual experience.
I can see several scenarios.
1) Child has learning issues and needs a tutor to work with the child to learn the material in the manner that the child learns. Not every Teacher is able to teach to all learning styles. A bright kid with LDs or ADHD could very well need a specific method of instruction that is not happening in the classroom. SPED instruction/time has been problematic due to the lack of Teachers making it hard to meet kids needs.
2) Child is in a class where other kids have been supplemented/enriched and are able to move at a faster pace. Teacher moves at that pace because it is matching with the regular pacing guide, I am thinking AP//IB/DE type classes. The tutor essentially helps the child match that pace.
3) Child is not making a real effort, doesn't care. The Tutor essentially forces the child to pay attention and do the work and learn the material. It is easy for the kid to blame the teacher.
FAPE requires Schools to accommodate all these issues , you can't pass it off somewhere else if parents are not allowed to get vouchers for private school
Why wouldnt FCPS be thrilled if more SPED parents hired tutors? FAPE is expensive!
My brother and I have LDs, we had IEPs in Public School in the 1980's and 90's but also worked with tutors. It is rare that schools will be able to meet all of child's needs. FAPE is meant to provide kids with the ability to engage in their education but not to necessarily push a child to their full potential. Plenty of parents use outside tutors or supports in order to help their kids beyond what is available through the school.
WRONG.
The Supreme Court case "Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District" really shook things up for what schools need to do for students with disabilities. Before this case, the rule of thumb from an older case, "Board of Education v. Rowley," was that schools just had to give students with disabilities some kind of benefit from their education, which could be pretty minimal.
But in 2017, Endrew F., a kid with autism, and his parents didn't think his school was doing enough. They argued that the school's plan for him wasn't really set up to help him make progress. The Supreme Court agreed and said that schools have to do more than just the bare minimum. They need to make sure their education plans are specially made for each student with disabilities, aiming to help them actually make progress that makes sense for them personally, not just any progress.
So, thanks to Endrew F.'s case, schools now have a higher bar to meet. They've got to really think about what each student needs and make sure they're helping them grow and learn in a way that's right for them. It's all about making sure students with disabilities get a fair shot at learning and improving, just like everyone else.