It most certainly IS if you have the financial capability to pay and you simply choose not to because you have shoehorned yourself into a program that was clearly intended for those folks who do a job that contributes to society but doesn’t actually pay very much. In other words, just because something is legal doesn’t mean it is ethical. |
This may have held water 30 years ago, but everyone has access to the internet now, so there is zero excuse not to educate yourself about how this works. People have been whining about the cost of college and the burden of student loans for at least 20 years, so it’s not like this is some closely guarded secret. |
Not everyone. DH and I have both lived and worked in the US all our lives and didn’t get checks because our income is too high. |
Are you talking about PSLF? If they had wanted to put income limits on the program, they would have. If a person qualifies for the program they haven't "shoehorned" their way into it just because you in your infinite wisdom have decided it's unethical for them to participate. It's no more unethical than rish people taking tax deductions. |
| No issues with Public Service Loan Forgiveness for certain professions. We are bleeding nurses and teachers. Should also include covering any education costs for training frontline workers like police, fire fighters, etc. |
It's a different proposition to forgive loans in certain professions to incentivize people to fill the need for the public good, i.e. nurses, teachers, police, and firefighters. I would support that, but that's not what OP is sticking us with the bill for. |
OP made payments for 20 years, probably mostly interest. |
You don't get to decide who is eligible for forgiveness. I don't like all the deductions in our tax code but I don't waste energy saying people who take them are behaving unethically. This reeks of rules for thee but not for me. |
Why should we pay the principle for her loans? |
-1 This isn't part of the tax code that anyone can see and factor into their decisions. Biden's student loan forgiveness is changing the rules years after the game is over. People might have made different decisions if they knew their loans would one day be forgiven. Plus our policies are supposed to incentivize the behavior that's best for society. For example, home buying credits for teachers and law enforcement because society needs more people in these fields. The taxpayers paying off OP's student loans isn't some huge benefit for society. |
|
It is costly to the everyday tax payers.
|
| Why should we pay off the OP's loans? |
This exactly. I have two adults kids who are struggling to pay off their college loans. why am i paying so someone get a feebie? |
Correction -- you voted for candidates that like "some" tax cuts for the wealthy. Like SALT. And student loan forgiveness with no tax liability. So, basically they only like tax cuts that benefit wealthy people in their blue districts/states. So, you don't win any nobility prizes. |
-1 Biden didn't create IBR forgiveness but he is finally implementing it the way it was intended. Educate yourself. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-22-103720 |