Sydney Sweeney - why isn’t she more famous?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

Yes, but outside of porn and strip shows, the actor’s face matters. Hers is not pretty enough to really make it in Hollywood.

Have you ever seen Gilda Radner?

I have and I think her face is much more interesting and prettier than Sydney Sweeney’s. (This sounds so mean, but Sydney Sweeney’s face makes me think of fetal alcohol syndrome.) Plus, Gilda was a stand up comic. That’s different.

She is broadly regarded as one of the hottest actresses by Gen Z. And in fact, that bonked in the head look is considered a positive. Gen Z goes nuts for that sleepy eyed look.

Hot and pretty are not synonyms. SS is undoubtedly hot, but her face gives "did anybody count the chromosomes" when she looks directly at the camera. Angles are her friend.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

Yes, but outside of porn and strip shows, the actor’s face matters. Hers is not pretty enough to really make it in Hollywood.

Have you ever seen Gilda Radner?

I have and I think her face is much more interesting and prettier than Sydney Sweeney’s. (This sounds so mean, but Sydney Sweeney’s face makes me think of fetal alcohol syndrome.) Plus, Gilda was a stand up comic. That’s different.

She is broadly regarded as one of the hottest actresses by Gen Z. And in fact, that bonked in the head look is considered a positive. Gen Z goes nuts for that sleepy eyed look.

Hot and pretty are not synonyms. SS is undoubtedly hot, but her face gives "did anybody count the chromosomes" when she looks directly at the camera. Angles are her friend.

Yeah, I think people here are misunderstanding her appeal. One, she's a euphoria actress. So she's got a strong cool factor for that. And two, I mean it quite literally that the kids these days LIKE that downsy look. It's pretty to them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

Yes, but outside of porn and strip shows, the actor’s face matters. Hers is not pretty enough to really make it in Hollywood.

Have you ever seen Gilda Radner?

I have and I think her face is much more interesting and prettier than Sydney Sweeney’s. (This sounds so mean, but Sydney Sweeney’s face makes me think of fetal alcohol syndrome.) Plus, Gilda was a stand up comic. That’s different.

She is broadly regarded as one of the hottest actresses by Gen Z. And in fact, that bonked in the head look is considered a positive. Gen Z goes nuts for that sleepy eyed look.

Well clearly Gen Z has bad taste. Thankfully, the generation below, the little kids, seem to have had enough of ugly and weird (and in the case of Sydney Sweeney, congenitally impaired). My 6 and 8 year olds are legitimately afraid to go inside a Target, even for the toys, because of the ugly models on the walls. My 8 year old goes nuts about how ugly they are and asks, “Is that even a boy or a girl because I can’t tell. Whatever it is, why are they so ugly? Aren’t models supposed to look nice?” And aren’t Hollywood stars supposed to also? Sydney Sweeney does not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

Yes, but outside of porn and strip shows, the actor’s face matters. Hers is not pretty enough to really make it in Hollywood.

Have you ever seen Gilda Radner?

I have and I think her face is much more interesting and prettier than Sydney Sweeney’s. (This sounds so mean, but Sydney Sweeney’s face makes me think of fetal alcohol syndrome.) Plus, Gilda was a stand up comic. That’s different.

She is broadly regarded as one of the hottest actresses by Gen Z. And in fact, that bonked in the head look is considered a positive. Gen Z goes nuts for that sleepy eyed look.

Well clearly Gen Z has bad taste. Thankfully, the generation below, the little kids, seem to have had enough of ugly and weird (and in the case of Sydney Sweeney, congenitally impaired). My 6 and 8 year olds are legitimately afraid to go inside a Target, even for the toys, because of the ugly models on the walls. My 8 year old goes nuts about how ugly they are and asks, “Is that even a boy or a girl because I can’t tell. Whatever it is, why are they so ugly? Aren’t models supposed to look nice?” And aren’t Hollywood stars supposed to also? Sydney Sweeney does not.

And then everyone cheered.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

Yes, but outside of porn and strip shows, the actor’s face matters. Hers is not pretty enough to really make it in Hollywood.

Have you ever seen Gilda Radner?

I have and I think her face is much more interesting and prettier than Sydney Sweeney’s. (This sounds so mean, but Sydney Sweeney’s face makes me think of fetal alcohol syndrome.) Plus, Gilda was a stand up comic. That’s different.

She is broadly regarded as one of the hottest actresses by Gen Z. And in fact, that bonked in the head look is considered a positive. Gen Z goes nuts for that sleepy eyed look.

Well clearly Gen Z has bad taste. Thankfully, the generation below, the little kids, seem to have had enough of ugly and weird (and in the case of Sydney Sweeney, congenitally impaired). My 6 and 8 year olds are legitimately afraid to go inside a Target, even for the toys, because of the ugly models on the walls. My 8 year old goes nuts about how ugly they are and asks, “Is that even a boy or a girl because I can’t tell. Whatever it is, why are they so ugly? Aren’t models supposed to look nice?” And aren’t Hollywood stars supposed to also? Sydney Sweeney does not.

Sydney Sweeney is objectively not ugly.

These conversations are similar to when kids argue whether superman or Spiderman would win in a fight. And that's a charitable comparison.

Perhaps a more accurate one would be if a guy said, well I can't beat you up but this other guy could. Right? Because Sydney Sweeney is very likely more attractive than everyone posting on this thread. I mean, are you on the cover of magazines and getting cast in blockbusters? No?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

Yes, but outside of porn and strip shows, the actor’s face matters. Hers is not pretty enough to really make it in Hollywood.

Have you ever seen Gilda Radner?

I have and I think her face is much more interesting and prettier than Sydney Sweeney’s. (This sounds so mean, but Sydney Sweeney’s face makes me think of fetal alcohol syndrome.) Plus, Gilda was a stand up comic. That’s different.

She is broadly regarded as one of the hottest actresses by Gen Z. And in fact, that bonked in the head look is considered a positive. Gen Z goes nuts for that sleepy eyed look.

Well clearly Gen Z has bad taste. Thankfully, the generation below, the little kids, seem to have had enough of ugly and weird (and in the case of Sydney Sweeney, congenitally impaired). My 6 and 8 year olds are legitimately afraid to go inside a Target, even for the toys, because of the ugly models on the walls. My 8 year old goes nuts about how ugly they are and asks, “Is that even a boy or a girl because I can’t tell. Whatever it is, why are they so ugly? Aren’t models supposed to look nice?” And aren’t Hollywood stars supposed to also? Sydney Sweeney does not.

Sydney Sweeney is objectively not ugly.

These conversations are similar to when kids argue whether superman or Spiderman would win in a fight. And that's a charitable comparison.

Perhaps a more accurate one would be if a guy said, well I can't beat you up but this other guy could. Right? Because Sydney Sweeney is very likely more attractive than everyone posting on this thread. I mean, are you on the cover of magazines and getting cast in blockbusters? No?

+1

These people are delusional.

There's nobody posting here even remotely close to being beautiful enough to criticize the appearance of this woman

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

Yes, but outside of porn and strip shows, the actor’s face matters. Hers is not pretty enough to really make it in Hollywood.

Have you ever seen Gilda Radner?

I have and I think her face is much more interesting and prettier than Sydney Sweeney’s. (This sounds so mean, but Sydney Sweeney’s face makes me think of fetal alcohol syndrome.) Plus, Gilda was a stand up comic. That’s different.

She is broadly regarded as one of the hottest actresses by Gen Z. And in fact, that bonked in the head look is considered a positive. Gen Z goes nuts for that sleepy eyed look.

Well clearly Gen Z has bad taste. Thankfully, the generation below, the little kids, seem to have had enough of ugly and weird (and in the case of Sydney Sweeney, congenitally impaired). My 6 and 8 year olds are legitimately afraid to go inside a Target, even for the toys, because of the ugly models on the walls. My 8 year old goes nuts about how ugly they are and asks, “Is that even a boy or a girl because I can’t tell. Whatever it is, why are they so ugly? Aren’t models supposed to look nice?” And aren’t Hollywood stars supposed to also? Sydney Sweeney does not.

Sydney Sweeney is objectively not ugly.

These conversations are similar to when kids argue whether superman or Spiderman would win in a fight. And that's a charitable comparison.

Perhaps a more accurate one would be if a guy said, well I can't beat you up but this other guy could. Right? Because Sydney Sweeney is very likely more attractive than everyone posting on this thread. I mean, are you on the cover of magazines and getting cast in blockbusters? No?

+1

These people are delusional.

There's nobody posting here even remotely close to being beautiful enough to criticize the appearance of this woman

Thoroughly mid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

Yes, but outside of porn and strip shows, the actor’s face matters. Hers is not pretty enough to really make it in Hollywood.

Have you ever seen Gilda Radner?

I have and I think her face is much more interesting and prettier than Sydney Sweeney’s. (This sounds so mean, but Sydney Sweeney’s face makes me think of fetal alcohol syndrome.) Plus, Gilda was a stand up comic. That’s different.

She is broadly regarded as one of the hottest actresses by Gen Z. And in fact, that bonked in the head look is considered a positive. Gen Z goes nuts for that sleepy eyed look.

Well clearly Gen Z has bad taste. Thankfully, the generation below, the little kids, seem to have had enough of ugly and weird (and in the case of Sydney Sweeney, congenitally impaired). My 6 and 8 year olds are legitimately afraid to go inside a Target, even for the toys, because of the ugly models on the walls. My 8 year old goes nuts about how ugly they are and asks, “Is that even a boy or a girl because I can’t tell. Whatever it is, why are they so ugly? Aren’t models supposed to look nice?” And aren’t Hollywood stars supposed to also? Sydney Sweeney does not.

Sydney Sweeney is objectively not ugly.

These conversations are similar to when kids argue whether superman or Spiderman would win in a fight. And that's a charitable comparison.

Perhaps a more accurate one would be if a guy said, well I can't beat you up but this other guy could. Right? Because Sydney Sweeney is very likely more attractive than everyone posting on this thread. I mean, are you on the cover of magazines and getting cast in blockbusters? No?

Sydney Sweeney is not objectively pretty!

She looks like she has a serious birth defect for god’s sake!

Who cares what the posters look like? What does that have to do with Sydney’s fitness to be a tv/film star?!?

That’s like saying I can’t criticize Trump or Biden’s leadership because I don’t run a country. Or that I can’t comment on a sport star’s athletic skills or lack thereof because they’re probably better than I am. Why even have sports analysts? None of them can currently play as well as players. Why have any critics at all? We should just outlaw opinions and reviews, just to be certain that the people holding them aren’t worse at whatever they’re critiquing.

Let’s assume I’m a hideous troll who frequently gets mistaken for a toad, I still have the eyes to see that Sidney Sweeney is no Brooke Shields and does not belong in front of a screen where she can be viewed from the neck up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

Yes, but outside of porn and strip shows, the actor’s face matters. Hers is not pretty enough to really make it in Hollywood.

Have you ever seen Gilda Radner?

I have and I think her face is much more interesting and prettier than Sydney Sweeney’s. (This sounds so mean, but Sydney Sweeney’s face makes me think of fetal alcohol syndrome.) Plus, Gilda was a stand up comic. That’s different.

She is broadly regarded as one of the hottest actresses by Gen Z. And in fact, that bonked in the head look is considered a positive. Gen Z goes nuts for that sleepy eyed look.

Well clearly Gen Z has bad taste. Thankfully, the generation below, the little kids, seem to have had enough of ugly and weird (and in the case of Sydney Sweeney, congenitally impaired). My 6 and 8 year olds are legitimately afraid to go inside a Target, even for the toys, because of the ugly models on the walls. My 8 year old goes nuts about how ugly they are and asks, “Is that even a boy or a girl because I can’t tell. Whatever it is, why are they so ugly? Aren’t models supposed to look nice?” And aren’t Hollywood stars supposed to also? Sydney Sweeney does not.

Sydney Sweeney is objectively not ugly.

These conversations are similar to when kids argue whether superman or Spiderman would win in a fight. And that's a charitable comparison.

Perhaps a more accurate one would be if a guy said, well I can't beat you up but this other guy could. Right? Because Sydney Sweeney is very likely more attractive than everyone posting on this thread. I mean, are you on the cover of magazines and getting cast in blockbusters? No?

Sydney Sweeney is not objectively pretty!

She looks like she has a serious birth defect for god’s sake!

Who cares what the posters look like? What does that have to do with Sydney’s fitness to be a tv/film star?!?

That’s like saying I can’t criticize Trump or Biden’s leadership because I don’t run a country. Or that I can’t comment on a sport star’s athletic skills or lack thereof because they’re probably better than I am. Why even have sports analysts? None of them can currently play as well as players. Why have any critics at all? We should just outlaw opinions and reviews, just to be certain that the people holding them aren’t worse at whatever they’re critiquing.

Let’s assume I’m a hideous troll who frequently gets mistaken for a toad, I still have the eyes to see that Sidney Sweeney is no Brooke Shields and does not belong in front of a screen where she can be viewed from the neck up.

She is not appealing to women. To middle aged housewife women. Women who use terms like "classic beauty" or who say things like like "whatever happened to stars like Audrey Hepburn"

Women that think Anne Hathaway is beautiful. They will never admit that someone like Sydney Sweeney is beautiful.

She is, however, very very appealing to the 18-35 male cohort.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

Yes, but outside of porn and strip shows, the actor’s face matters. Hers is not pretty enough to really make it in Hollywood.

Have you ever seen Gilda Radner?

I have and I think her face is much more interesting and prettier than Sydney Sweeney’s. (This sounds so mean, but Sydney Sweeney’s face makes me think of fetal alcohol syndrome.) Plus, Gilda was a stand up comic. That’s different.

She is broadly regarded as one of the hottest actresses by Gen Z. And in fact, that bonked in the head look is considered a positive. Gen Z goes nuts for that sleepy eyed look.

Well clearly Gen Z has bad taste. Thankfully, the generation below, the little kids, seem to have had enough of ugly and weird (and in the case of Sydney Sweeney, congenitally impaired). My 6 and 8 year olds are legitimately afraid to go inside a Target, even for the toys, because of the ugly models on the walls. My 8 year old goes nuts about how ugly they are and asks, “Is that even a boy or a girl because I can’t tell. Whatever it is, why are they so ugly? Aren’t models supposed to look nice?” And aren’t Hollywood stars supposed to also? Sydney Sweeney does not.

Sydney Sweeney is objectively not ugly.

These conversations are similar to when kids argue whether superman or Spiderman would win in a fight. And that's a charitable comparison.

Perhaps a more accurate one would be if a guy said, well I can't beat you up but this other guy could. Right? Because Sydney Sweeney is very likely more attractive than everyone posting on this thread. I mean, are you on the cover of magazines and getting cast in blockbusters? No?

Sydney Sweeney is not objectively pretty!

She looks like she has a serious birth defect for god’s sake!

Who cares what the posters look like? What does that have to do with Sydney’s fitness to be a tv/film star?!?

That’s like saying I can’t criticize Trump or Biden’s leadership because I don’t run a country. Or that I can’t comment on a sport star’s athletic skills or lack thereof because they’re probably better than I am. Why even have sports analysts? None of them can currently play as well as players. Why have any critics at all? We should just outlaw opinions and reviews, just to be certain that the people holding them aren’t worse at whatever they’re critiquing.

Let’s assume I’m a hideous troll who frequently gets mistaken for a toad, I still have the eyes to see that Sidney Sweeney is no Brooke Shields and does not belong in front of a screen where she can be viewed from the neck up.

She is not appealing to women. To middle aged housewife women. Women who use terms like "classic beauty" or who say things like like "whatever happened to stars like Audrey Hepburn"

Women that think Anne Hathaway is beautiful. They will never admit that someone like Sydney Sweeney is beautiful.

She is, however, very very appealing to the 18-35 male cohort.

News at 11: Horny Dudes Like Boobies

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

Yes, but outside of porn and strip shows, the actor’s face matters. Hers is not pretty enough to really make it in Hollywood.

Have you ever seen Gilda Radner?

I have and I think her face is much more interesting and prettier than Sydney Sweeney’s. (This sounds so mean, but Sydney Sweeney’s face makes me think of fetal alcohol syndrome.) Plus, Gilda was a stand up comic. That’s different.

She is broadly regarded as one of the hottest actresses by Gen Z. And in fact, that bonked in the head look is considered a positive. Gen Z goes nuts for that sleepy eyed look.

Well clearly Gen Z has bad taste. Thankfully, the generation below, the little kids, seem to have had enough of ugly and weird (and in the case of Sydney Sweeney, congenitally impaired). My 6 and 8 year olds are legitimately afraid to go inside a Target, even for the toys, because of the ugly models on the walls. My 8 year old goes nuts about how ugly they are and asks, “Is that even a boy or a girl because I can’t tell. Whatever it is, why are they so ugly? Aren’t models supposed to look nice?” And aren’t Hollywood stars supposed to also? Sydney Sweeney does not.

Sydney Sweeney is objectively not ugly.

These conversations are similar to when kids argue whether superman or Spiderman would win in a fight. And that's a charitable comparison.

Perhaps a more accurate one would be if a guy said, well I can't beat you up but this other guy could. Right? Because Sydney Sweeney is very likely more attractive than everyone posting on this thread. I mean, are you on the cover of magazines and getting cast in blockbusters? No?

Sydney Sweeney is not objectively pretty!

She looks like she has a serious birth defect for god’s sake!

Who cares what the posters look like? What does that have to do with Sydney’s fitness to be a tv/film star?!?

That’s like saying I can’t criticize Trump or Biden’s leadership because I don’t run a country. Or that I can’t comment on a sport star’s athletic skills or lack thereof because they’re probably better than I am. Why even have sports analysts? None of them can currently play as well as players. Why have any critics at all? We should just outlaw opinions and reviews, just to be certain that the people holding them aren’t worse at whatever they’re critiquing.

Let’s assume I’m a hideous troll who frequently gets mistaken for a toad, I still have the eyes to see that Sidney Sweeney is no Brooke Shields and does not belong in front of a screen where she can be viewed from the neck up.

She is not appealing to women. To middle aged housewife women. Women who use terms like "classic beauty" or who say things like like "whatever happened to stars like Audrey Hepburn"

Women that think Anne Hathaway is beautiful. They will never admit that someone like Sydney Sweeney is beautiful.

She is, however, very very appealing to the 18-35 male cohort.

News at 11: Horny Dudes Like Boobies

Nah. You really do have it wrong. It's not just the figure.

She's beautiful. But you only see the figure and try to dismiss her as only a set of tits to make yourself feel better about yourself.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

Yes, but outside of porn and strip shows, the actor’s face matters. Hers is not pretty enough to really make it in Hollywood.

Have you ever seen Gilda Radner?

I have and I think her face is much more interesting and prettier than Sydney Sweeney’s. (This sounds so mean, but Sydney Sweeney’s face makes me think of fetal alcohol syndrome.) Plus, Gilda was a stand up comic. That’s different.

She is broadly regarded as one of the hottest actresses by Gen Z. And in fact, that bonked in the head look is considered a positive. Gen Z goes nuts for that sleepy eyed look.

Well clearly Gen Z has bad taste. Thankfully, the generation below, the little kids, seem to have had enough of ugly and weird (and in the case of Sydney Sweeney, congenitally impaired). My 6 and 8 year olds are legitimately afraid to go inside a Target, even for the toys, because of the ugly models on the walls. My 8 year old goes nuts about how ugly they are and asks, “Is that even a boy or a girl because I can’t tell. Whatever it is, why are they so ugly? Aren’t models supposed to look nice?” And aren’t Hollywood stars supposed to also? Sydney Sweeney does not.

Sydney Sweeney is objectively not ugly.

These conversations are similar to when kids argue whether superman or Spiderman would win in a fight. And that's a charitable comparison.

Perhaps a more accurate one would be if a guy said, well I can't beat you up but this other guy could. Right? Because Sydney Sweeney is very likely more attractive than everyone posting on this thread. I mean, are you on the cover of magazines and getting cast in blockbusters? No?

Sydney Sweeney is not objectively pretty!

She looks like she has a serious birth defect for god’s sake!

Who cares what the posters look like? What does that have to do with Sydney’s fitness to be a tv/film star?!?

That’s like saying I can’t criticize Trump or Biden’s leadership because I don’t run a country. Or that I can’t comment on a sport star’s athletic skills or lack thereof because they’re probably better than I am. Why even have sports analysts? None of them can currently play as well as players. Why have any critics at all? We should just outlaw opinions and reviews, just to be certain that the people holding them aren’t worse at whatever they’re critiquing.

Let’s assume I’m a hideous troll who frequently gets mistaken for a toad, I still have the eyes to see that Sidney Sweeney is no Brooke Shields and does not belong in front of a screen where she can be viewed from the neck up.

She is not appealing to women. To middle aged housewife women. Women who use terms like "classic beauty" or who say things like like "whatever happened to stars like Audrey Hepburn"

Women that think Anne Hathaway is beautiful. They will never admit that someone like Sydney Sweeney is beautiful.

She is, however, very very appealing to the 18-35 male cohort.

Are you her agent or her mom? Nearly anything with a vagina is appealing to the 18-35 male cohort. That still doesn’t mean that Sydney Sweeney belongs on screen. She is not pretty enough to be a star. Tara Reid, as an example, looked similar, but was much prettier and not deformed and she didn’t make it too big, either. You can’t when you’re competing against prettier, more talented actresses.

[Anonymous]

the real question is: did she or didn't she with Glen?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

Yes, but outside of porn and strip shows, the actor’s face matters. Hers is not pretty enough to really make it in Hollywood.

Have you ever seen Gilda Radner?

I have and I think her face is much more interesting and prettier than Sydney Sweeney’s. (This sounds so mean, but Sydney Sweeney’s face makes me think of fetal alcohol syndrome.) Plus, Gilda was a stand up comic. That’s different.

She is broadly regarded as one of the hottest actresses by Gen Z. And in fact, that bonked in the head look is considered a positive. Gen Z goes nuts for that sleepy eyed look.

Well clearly Gen Z has bad taste. Thankfully, the generation below, the little kids, seem to have had enough of ugly and weird (and in the case of Sydney Sweeney, congenitally impaired). My 6 and 8 year olds are legitimately afraid to go inside a Target, even for the toys, because of the ugly models on the walls. My 8 year old goes nuts about how ugly they are and asks, “Is that even a boy or a girl because I can’t tell. Whatever it is, why are they so ugly? Aren’t models supposed to look nice?” And aren’t Hollywood stars supposed to also? Sydney Sweeney does not.

Sydney Sweeney is objectively not ugly.

These conversations are similar to when kids argue whether superman or Spiderman would win in a fight. And that's a charitable comparison.

Perhaps a more accurate one would be if a guy said, well I can't beat you up but this other guy could. Right? Because Sydney Sweeney is very likely more attractive than everyone posting on this thread. I mean, are you on the cover of magazines and getting cast in blockbusters? No?

+1

These people are delusional.

There's nobody posting here even remotely close to being beautiful enough to criticize the appearance of this woman

One thing has nothing to do with another. There are lots of things I am not or cannot do that I have an opinion on.

For me, she's pretty in a basic way. Not gorgeous. I agree it's the boobs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She has the most spectacular rack I've ever seen . They are mesmerizing.

Yes, but outside of porn and strip shows, the actor’s face matters. Hers is not pretty enough to really make it in Hollywood.

Have you ever seen Gilda Radner?

I have and I think her face is much more interesting and prettier than Sydney Sweeney’s. (This sounds so mean, but Sydney Sweeney’s face makes me think of fetal alcohol syndrome.) Plus, Gilda was a stand up comic. That’s different.

She is broadly regarded as one of the hottest actresses by Gen Z. And in fact, that bonked in the head look is considered a positive. Gen Z goes nuts for that sleepy eyed look.

Well clearly Gen Z has bad taste. Thankfully, the generation below, the little kids, seem to have had enough of ugly and weird (and in the case of Sydney Sweeney, congenitally impaired). My 6 and 8 year olds are legitimately afraid to go inside a Target, even for the toys, because of the ugly models on the walls. My 8 year old goes nuts about how ugly they are and asks, “Is that even a boy or a girl because I can’t tell. Whatever it is, why are they so ugly? Aren’t models supposed to look nice?” And aren’t Hollywood stars supposed to also? Sydney Sweeney does not.

Sydney Sweeney is objectively not ugly.

These conversations are similar to when kids argue whether superman or Spiderman would win in a fight. And that's a charitable comparison.

Perhaps a more accurate one would be if a guy said, well I can't beat you up but this other guy could. Right? Because Sydney Sweeney is very likely more attractive than everyone posting on this thread. I mean, are you on the cover of magazines and getting cast in blockbusters? No?

Sydney Sweeney is not objectively pretty!

She looks like she has a serious birth defect for god’s sake!

Who cares what the posters look like? What does that have to do with Sydney’s fitness to be a tv/film star?!?

That’s like saying I can’t criticize Trump or Biden’s leadership because I don’t run a country. Or that I can’t comment on a sport star’s athletic skills or lack thereof because they’re probably better than I am. Why even have sports analysts? None of them can currently play as well as players. Why have any critics at all? We should just outlaw opinions and reviews, just to be certain that the people holding them aren’t worse at whatever they’re critiquing.

Let’s assume I’m a hideous troll who frequently gets mistaken for a toad, I still have the eyes to see that Sidney Sweeney is no Brooke Shields and does not belong in front of a screen where she can be viewed from the neck up.

She is not appealing to women. To middle aged housewife women. Women who use terms like "classic beauty" or who say things like like "whatever happened to stars like Audrey Hepburn"

Women that think Anne Hathaway is beautiful. They will never admit that someone like Sydney Sweeney is beautiful.

She is, however, very very appealing to the 18-35 male cohort.

Not really. I'm a man.

Look, she's not ugly. Agree. She has a very sexy body. No doubt. She's probably a 6 or 7 at most. There are many girls that were so much hotter though in college. She's just your neighborhood girl. Nothing special.