Privilege tax on gun ammunition

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:There is no constitutional basis for abortion.

There was for 50 years. Easy come, easy go. What is good enough for abortion is good enough for ammo.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like we have to pretend that some anonymous yo-yo thinks the founders didn’t want Americans to have ammo to use in their guns.

Sorry but I will take what the Founding Fathers ACTUALLY WROTE AND SAID over whatever imagined nonsense that they NEVER wrote or said, despite whatever some random yo-yo ammosexual on DCUM wants to try and claim. You and your half-assed opinions will never rank higher than the Founding Fathers actual words. Never.

I will also take ACTUAL DOCUMENTED HISTORY over whatever some internet rando wants to claim as well - for example the gun nutters completely FALSE claims that the Founding Fathers intended for Americans to take up arms against their own government or imagined "tyranny." Sorry but history says otherwise. For example, the Whiskey Rebellion, which put 2A to the test shortly after it was ratified. A bunch of yahoos decided the whiskey tax was tyranny and wanted to take up arms against the government over it. The Founding Fathers voted and authorized the government to put that rebellion down and George Washington sent troops and squashed it.

So you can take your imagined gobbledygook that the Founding Fathers NEVER PROMISED YOU and write it on a little piece of paper, fold it up tightly and flush it down the toilet where it belongs with the rest of the shit that needs to be disposed of.

The Founding Fathers never wrote a single word about the right to abortion.

You can take your imagined namby pamby gobbeldygook about abortion and flush it with the shit as well.

History shows that during the Founding Fathers' time, abortion was uncontroversial and legal up until the point of "quickening" - when the mother could feel the baby's motion. https://magazine.jhsph.edu/2022/brief-history-abortion-us

Anyone trying to imagine the Founding Fathers held to current right wing beliefs about abortion would be WRONG.

The founders didn’t write anything about women in America having a constitutional right to an abortion. That’s been made out of whole cloth.

If the founders thought it was important they would have included it.

We know what the founders thought were important.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no constitutional basis for abortion.

There was for 50 years. Easy come, easy go. What is good enough for abortion is good enough for ammo.

Why didn’t the founders mention abortion? Because they thought killing unborn babies was inhumane.

SCOTUS made the correct decision. Let the states make their own laws.

No more lies about the constitution and abortion. It is absolutely not a constitutional right.

[Anonymous]

Did the founders mention women at all?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like we have to pretend that some anonymous yo-yo thinks the founders didn’t want Americans to have ammo to use in their guns.

Sorry but I will take what the Founding Fathers ACTUALLY WROTE AND SAID over whatever imagined nonsense that they NEVER wrote or said, despite whatever some random yo-yo ammosexual on DCUM wants to try and claim. You and your half-assed opinions will never rank higher than the Founding Fathers actual words. Never.

I will also take ACTUAL DOCUMENTED HISTORY over whatever some internet rando wants to claim as well - for example the gun nutters completely FALSE claims that the Founding Fathers intended for Americans to take up arms against their own government or imagined "tyranny." Sorry but history says otherwise. For example, the Whiskey Rebellion, which put 2A to the test shortly after it was ratified. A bunch of yahoos decided the whiskey tax was tyranny and wanted to take up arms against the government over it. The Founding Fathers voted and authorized the government to put that rebellion down and George Washington sent troops and squashed it.

So you can take your imagined gobbledygook that the Founding Fathers NEVER PROMISED YOU and write it on a little piece of paper, fold it up tightly and flush it down the toilet where it belongs with the rest of the shit that needs to be disposed of.

The Founding Fathers never wrote a single word about the right to abortion.

You can take your imagined namby pamby gobbeldygook about abortion and flush it with the shit as well.

History shows that during the Founding Fathers' time, abortion was uncontroversial and legal up until the point of "quickening" - when the mother could feel the baby's motion. https://magazine.jhsph.edu/2022/brief-history-abortion-us

Anyone trying to imagine the Founding Fathers held to current right wing beliefs about abortion would be WRONG.

The founders didn’t write anything about women in America having a constitutional right to an abortion. That’s been made out of whole cloth.

If the founders thought it was important they would have included it.

We know what the founders thought were important.

They did write about slavery. They made mistakes. No one has the right to force a woman's reproduction decisions concerning her own body. This has always been and will always be true. It takes a sustained, forceful effort, that continues on through generations of set-backs, to make societies reflect that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There is no constitutional basis for abortion.

There was for 50 years. Easy come, easy go. What is good enough for abortion is good enough for ammo.

Why didn’t the founders mention abortion? Because they thought killing unborn babies was inhumane.

SCOTUS made the correct decision. Let the states make their own laws.

No more lies about the constitution and abortion. It is absolutely not a constitutional right.

Please. The current justices made a decision that differs form the previous justices. When the make up of the court change evolves, the decision will again change.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did the founders mention women at all?

They couldn't. They didn't qualify as biologists.

Answer the question

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like we have to pretend that some anonymous yo-yo thinks the founders didn’t want Americans to have ammo to use in their guns.

Sorry but I will take what the Founding Fathers ACTUALLY WROTE AND SAID over whatever imagined nonsense that they NEVER wrote or said, despite whatever some random yo-yo ammosexual on DCUM wants to try and claim. You and your half-assed opinions will never rank higher than the Founding Fathers actual words. Never.

I will also take ACTUAL DOCUMENTED HISTORY over whatever some internet rando wants to claim as well - for example the gun nutters completely FALSE claims that the Founding Fathers intended for Americans to take up arms against their own government or imagined "tyranny." Sorry but history says otherwise. For example, the Whiskey Rebellion, which put 2A to the test shortly after it was ratified. A bunch of yahoos decided the whiskey tax was tyranny and wanted to take up arms against the government over it. The Founding Fathers voted and authorized the government to put that rebellion down and George Washington sent troops and squashed it.

So you can take your imagined gobbledygook that the Founding Fathers NEVER PROMISED YOU and write it on a little piece of paper, fold it up tightly and flush it down the toilet where it belongs with the rest of the shit that needs to be disposed of.

The Founding Fathers never wrote a single word about the right to abortion.

You can take your imagined namby pamby gobbeldygook about abortion and flush it with the shit as well.

History shows that during the Founding Fathers' time, abortion was uncontroversial and legal up until the point of "quickening" - when the mother could feel the baby's motion. https://magazine.jhsph.edu/2022/brief-history-abortion-us

Anyone trying to imagine the Founding Fathers held to current right wing beliefs about abortion would be WRONG.

The founders didn’t write anything about women in America having a constitutional right to an abortion. That’s been made out of whole cloth.

If the founders thought it was important they would have included it.

We know what the founders thought were important.

They did write about slavery. They made mistakes. No one has the right to force a woman's reproduction decisions concerning her own body. This has always been and will always be true. It takes a sustained, forceful effort, that continues on through generations of set-backs, to make societies reflect that.

Does your body have two hearts? Two brains? Four kidneys? et cetera

You make whatever decision you want for your body. Your interference into this decision for other women wont be tolerated. Eventually will again be reflected in law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did the founders mention women at all?

They couldn't. They didn't qualify as biologists.

Answer the question

Asked and answered. Pay attention.

Non responsive.

The answer is NO. The founders didn’t think of women at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did the founders mention women at all?

They couldn't. They didn't qualify as biologists.

Answer the question

Asked and answered. Pay attention.

Non responsive.

The answer is NO. The founders didn’t think of women at all.

The founders could not comprehend that mothers would cherish the right to kill their own son or daughter.

The founders had nothing to say about abortion because they didn’t think abortion should be a constitutional right.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did the founders mention women at all?

They couldn't. They didn't qualify as biologists.

Answer the question

Asked and answered. Pay attention.

Non responsive.

The answer is NO. The founders didn’t think of women at all.

The founders could not comprehend that mothers would cherish the right to kill their own son or daughter.

The founders had nothing to say about abortion because they didn’t think abortion should be a constitutional right.

Again, don't have an abortion if that is your choose. That is your business and your business alone. Stay out of this decision for other women.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Did the founders mention women at all?

They couldn't. They didn't qualify as biologists.

Answer the question

Asked and answered. Pay attention.

Non responsive.

The answer is NO. The founders didn’t think of women at all.

The founders could not comprehend that mothers would cherish the right to kill their own son or daughter.

The founders had nothing to say about abortion because they didn’t think abortion should be a constitutional right.

Find something to support this assertion

[Anonymous]

The further down the rabbit hole this Supreme Court wants to go, relying on more and more twisted originalist reasoning, the better. Court reform, once an outlandish prospect, gets more palatable with every 6-3 decision.
Orginalism is a conservative cudgel, wielded with smug entitlement, but an imprecise weapon, and can cut the other way.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Last time I checked the right to keep and bear arms was a right not a privilege. But as the long as the dems keep wasting their time on these foolish pursuits the less real damage they will do.

I’m a Textualist and the 2nd Amendment says nothing about “ammunition.” You infer that “arms” includes ammunition, but that’s not what the text says. The Framers could have included that language, but they chose not to.

And you might rightly say - “What’s the point of stating ‘arms’ if you don’t infer the right to ammunition?”

Well, look to the “well regulated militia” portion of the 2nd Amendment. The ammunition of the militia is often kept separate from the arms maintained by the individual. You retrieve ammo from the depot at the direction of a commanding officer. Sounds like a “well regulated militia” to me.

In short, you can’t be a Textualist and read a right to ammo in the 2nd Amendment. It doesn’t exist.

This is exactly what we learned in college political science. When the 2nd amendment was written, the government issued ammunition to the militia as needed. You had the gun, the government decided when you could have bullets.

Let’s limit how many bullets you can buy in a year and tax the hell out of them.

[Anonymous]

The State of Washington is really bad at looking at ramification of their decisions.

Remember CHOP/CHAZ - which the Seattle mayor talked about the "summer of love" - where there were numerous assaults, violent crimes, and a murder?
Yep, Washington.

In Seattle - defund the police - the original goal was to cut by 50% which they never reached. They got to a 17% cut, and as was expected by most thinking people - the force shrunk and crime rose. Duh.

So, they want to tax ammunition for the average Joe - and yet they expect their residents to be responsible gun owners.
Part of being a responsible gun owner is practicing with your firearm.
Do they really want their firearms owners to be untrained?