Privilege tax on gun ammunition
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
Everyone already knows that the GOP opposes democracy and voting. No need to shout it. |
Anonymous
You are spreading disinformation. https://wng.org/sift/did-colonial-america-have-abortions-yes-but-1617409251 |
Anonymous
Cited straight from a pro-life propaganda rag that doesn't even try to hide it 🤡 Sorry but there are a number of articles upthread that already debunk it. |
Anonymous
What’s wrong with that ? I’m not seeing a problem here. |
Anonymous
|
Will just push the sane residents to move to Florida. A place where judges understand the constitution - https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4407341-federal-judge-rules-ban-on-firearms-in-post-offices-unconstitutional/amp/
|
Anonymous
Ahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!! 
Omhg I am dying "based on Biblical truth?" Dear, thank you. I so needed a laugh today! |
Anonymous
That judge DOES not understand the Constitution. |
Anonymous
An excerpt from Abortion Rites: A Social History of Abortion in America American culture, during the time we are discussing, was based on the Bible. The Christian Bible. I take it you are not someone who understands history in even the most simple and superficial terms. Editor-in-chief of WORLD. Dean, World Journalism Institute. Senior Fellow, Acton Institute. Susan and I have been married for 44 years. Four sons, four daughters-in-law, five grandchildren. Formal education: B.A. from Yale University in 1971, Ph.D. in American Culture from the University of Michigan in 1976. Real education: Grew up in Judaism, became an atheist and a communist, and then (purely through God's grace) a Christian in 1976. I read the excerpt and it is very interesting. It’s clear the author has well sourced historical facts in his book. Do you deny that religion was not dominant at this point in the history of America? If you do, please explain why. |
Anonymous
Where? What facts in the linked excerpt are debunked? |
Anonymous
With their empty barrels. Peew peew peew 🔫 |
Anonymous
What was presented in that article was a handful of extremely narrowly cherrypicked instances, mostly from very puritanical communities. But as you should know, America was not religiously monolithic and had people of many different faiths come to settle, often due to persecution or religious differences. Outside of those puritanical and repressive communities represented in the "biblical truth" article, it was a very different story as evidenced by the articles that others posted (Benjamin Franklin etc.) |
Anonymous
The article is excerpted from a book that deals with the subject in depth. Both book and article are based on historical facts, documented facts. |
Anonymous
In the 19th century, in virtually every state and territory, laws were enacted to define abortion as a crime throughout pregnancy. They contained only narrow exceptions, generally permitting abortion only if necessary to preserve the mother's life. The primary reason for stricter abortion laws, according to their legislative history, was to afford greater protection to unborn children. This reflected a heightened appreciation of prenatal life based on new medical knowledge. It is significant that the medical profession spearheaded efforts to afford greater protection to unborn lives than had been recognized under the common law's archaic "quickening" distinction. |
Anonymous
So the centuries prior to that… just don’t exist for you, forced birther? 
|
Anonymous
|
The bill number is:
HB 2238 in the house (Washington). |