Half of the east is the south. |
For most families, state flagships have always been the “thing” |
+1 |
Yes, by definition. |
Who cares and who can possibly know? |
X1000000 |
UF and UGA are not way behind, your understanding of prestige is. |
HYPSM will be just fine. Chicago, Rice, Northwestern, etc are not going anywhere.
The Biggest Losers: Dartmouth, Bowdoin, Williams, Amherst, etc. They'll be bitten by the hand that fed them - athletics. These schools will receive the same "woke agenda" accusation as HYP (perhaps correctly), but the second punch is the one that will connect: the many articles that will be coming down the pike about the full pay downhill skiers, sailing, and fencers (etc). These colleges are building classes that are either Pell kids paying zero and St Ann's squash who are paying full fare. That makes for a dysfunctional classroom experience that holds zero appeal to the rest of the world. Other winners: The Next Michigan: MN, Iowa, Illinois, Oregon .. basically any flagship with a college town and a football team. (Schools like UCs, UT Austin already in the Michigan category) Revenge of the Nerds aka "I know what I'm paying for": Purdue, Case, CMU, RPI, WPI, Texas A&M, VT. Hail Mary: ND but also places like Santa Clara, Loyola Marymount, Gonzaga, Dayton, U of San Diego, Marquette. |
More losers: Woke Seven sisters (excuse me, “siblings”) colleges, aka Smith, Bryn Mawr |
I'd add Hillsdale as a potential up and comer. |
Yes, schools like USC, NYU, and Northeastern will continue to rise
|
Ivy degrees will be the equivalent of state schools in 20 years. The polish is off and they will continue to crumble. |
It wouldn't matter for rich people, but for most of the regular normal middle class, major is more important than the school already. UMD CS or UVA McIntire is more valuable than some humanities Ivy degrees. |
so is Mich State, Pitt, OH state.. all in the rust belt. |
But, it's becoming even more popular now for higher achieving kids who are being shut out at T20. |