+1 third tier |
Unless you’re an admissions officer at a top graduate program. They like Amherst grads at least as well as Ivy grads. |
Nope |
Easier said than done. Most of the top 30 LACs don't give merit aid. And even for the few that do offer merit, a lot of the schools in the 20s and 30s have become significantly more competitive admits over the past few years. PP's kids won't get merit aid unless their stats are well above average for the school. |
why? There many colleges that don't cost $60K+ other than Bama. I can afford to send DC to a different oos if needed. It certainly won't be Bama. |
This is simply not true. The quality of UG education is often far superior. Grad school admissions committees adore LACs. |
keep thinking that lol |
[mastodon]
I don’t know that they adore all LACs but they adore Amherst. My fellow students all went to Ivy or similar graduate schools. I see lots of Harvard, Yale, Columbia grad school resumes and Amherst grads are over-represented in these graduate programs. Saying otherwise just betrays your ignorance. There are some exceptions, like CS, and of course they don’t have an engineering school. |
What field are you in? LACs are a joke for STEM. |
For engineering but that is not universally true for STEM by any means. Elite LACs have excellent med school admission outcomes, for example. |
Let me guess. Engineering, CS or bust for your kids? Typical of people like you to have limited imaginations concerning disciplinary options and cross-disciplinary interests typically fostered at LACs. |
Premed courses are very basic and med schools do not care about major. The biggest weakness at LACs is STEM. |
you dk what you are talking about |
Not everyone is so fortunate. So good that you have choices, but others might not. |
|