
She raised a man who is dead set on [i]restoring rights to the unborn I hope you will nominate her and Alito for Sainthood then, or start a Samuel Alito's mom home for unwed mothers. Meanwhile, those of us who care about our freedoms and those of our daughters and granddaughters will continue to be seriously P*ssed off and applaud any and every effort to subvert this misguided over reach of politicians. |
There are plenty of people doing the Lord's work who aren't Christian. Most of the White Hats digging through the rubble in Syria aren't Christian. You don't have to believe in the The Lord to do his work, including providing medical care to women in need. And unfortunately, people can also believe in the Lord and commit evil either intentionally (clergy pedophilia) or because they have been led astray by false messengers (misogyny). Signed, a Christian |
Kudos to them but I am concerned their center, their staff, and the patients who visit could face high levels of harassment. I hope there is good security. |
She raised an a-hole like Alito? |
Sounds like that is the right name for that place. |
A reminder: Catholic attempts to "help" unwed mothers.
https://europeanacademyofreligionandsociety.com/news/historic-abuse-mother-and-baby-homes-in-ireland/?gclid=CjwKCAiArY2fBhB9EiwAWqHK6uw0wGmk1ksneD9yp_uZk6yuzKRGKG3o9OSrjAWoAU6a7rJJEHcRqxoC2Y0QAvD_BwE Don't see how the Satanists can be worse. |
I’m pro-choice, but…
Coercing people to perform satanic rituals (recite two tenets of Satanism per someone’s post above) in exchange for an abortion hardly seems like an improvement. They can talk about not coercing women to get sonograms etc, but they’re still coercing. All this “wink wink it’s sarcasm” doesn’t alleviate the trauma to a teenager who might still be religious but needs an abortion, and now she has to renounce her religion to get one. Why couldn’t they just open the door to a doctor on staff? |
That's not what the "ritual" is. The "ritual" is the abortion itself, and they're describing it this way to bring it under the protection of the First Amendment. |
I can't tell you how much I love this. If you are bothered by the satanic part...search and replace with sunshine and It's the most beautiful plan ever to restore womens rights. |
I get the part about bringing it under the first amendment via freedom of religion. But somebody’s post above clearly stated that women have to recite “two tenets of Satanism.” I have no idea what these tenets are, but they sure sound religious in a Satanic way. Also, that goes beyond the procedure itself to what the women believe. And that’s coercion. |
1. So cringe. 2. Won’t work, it’s not like I and three weeks of my cronies could start “The Cult of Theft” and use the first amendment to immunize ourselves from prosecution. Tip of the fedora, but they are just trolling. |
Pp again. All of which is to say, I love the first amendment concept, but I wish some non-coercive group (is it too much to hope even a liberal church) would do this. |
+1. You can’t actually pretend to worship the Devil. |
The first two tenets of Satanism (according to their website) are: I. One should strive to act with compassion and empathy toward all creatures in accordance with reason. II. The struggle for justice is an ongoing and necessary pursuit that should prevail over laws and institutions. I assume they're included to make the "ritual" part more arguably religious and I think you'd have to come from a pretty extreme form of Christianity to find the above statements in conflict with your principles. |
100% |