Is it accepted that Diana was assassinated?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Student of English history here. On the one hand, there's no proof it was an execution. OTOH, Queens who piss off the royal family often meet a bad end. It's a neat coincidence that Diana died in an accident before marrying her Muslim lover. Imagine the King of England with a Muslim step father.

I think we view the Monarchy as quaint, outdated, silly... there is some serious money and therefore power involved and, stranger things have happened.

They can't just chop off your head on trumped up charges anymore, but a wise woman 1) would never expect to be made happy by being Queen and 2) would be wise enough to know to play the game for her own safety and well being, as well as her children's.

IMHO

Susan Barrantes!

[Anonymous]

Live fast. Die young.

[Anonymous]

Um, no. I've never heard such nonsense even suggested.

[Anonymous]

It's also very interesting that Diana herself said she would be killed and it would look like a car accident.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's also very interesting that Diana herself said she would be killed and it would look like a car accident.

Well that was extremely likely to happen if she was allergic to seatbelts, as it appears she was, so I’m not that awed by her predictive powers here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

“Avril Lavigne replaced” lol

Uh-oh, I’m veering into blue because I do have questions about the Epstein suicide!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's also very interesting that Diana herself said she would be killed and it would look like a car accident.

Well that was extremely likely to happen if she was allergic to seatbelts, as it appears she was, so I’m not that awed by her predictive powers here.

[Anonymous]

It was an accident. The bigger mystery is why all the jfk files have not been released.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I should preface this question with saying that my husband and I are not conspiracy theorists nor are we particularly drawn to outlandish conclusions about much of anything. But when we were discussing the queens death with my parents the other day I offhandedly made the remark that it’s a complicated family for many reasons, one being that they like to off the women who arent behaving. It was meant sort of as a dark joke but also I do think they killed Diana and it wasn’t an accident. My husband joined me and thinking this was very obvious and then my parents basically fell over with shock that we would believe such an outlandish thing. It’s not a topic I haven’t thought much about this in years but now gets me wondering, do most people agree that Diana’s death wasn’t an accident or is it truly one of those outlandish things that the general public accepts that she was chased by paparazzi and killed accidently?

It was Putin.

100%.

Omg yes what if it was??

Before his time - He didn't become prime minister/president until 1999.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's also very interesting that Diana herself said she would be killed and it would look like a car accident.

Well that was extremely likely to happen if she was allergic to seatbelts, as it appears she was, so I’m not that awed by her predictive powers here.

Also considering she was actually not terribly bright--which I know is tantamount to heresy,, but really....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:No, it was an accident.

This is the correct answer. Occam’s razor, and all that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It was proven by the French government that the driver had illegal levels of alcohol in his system and that Diana and Dodi were not wearing seatbelts. While it's possible someone could have deliberately hit them, the reality is those two factors are what caused their deaths: they would have lived if they had buckled up!

Have you spent much time around people who regularly use drivers and big cars? I don't mean that in a snarky way. I have for work reasons, and I'm always stunned by how few of them wear seatbelts while also having bodyguards, home security, etc. Even sometimes tell me that I don't need to use a seatbelt. Uhh......I kinda do if I want to survive any sort of crash. It's bizarre, frankly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I should preface this question with saying that my husband and I are not conspiracy theorists nor are we particularly drawn to outlandish conclusions about much of anything. But when we were discussing the queens death with my parents the other day I offhandedly made the remark that it’s a complicated family for many reasons, one being that they like to off the women who arent behaving. It was meant sort of as a dark joke but also I do think they killed Diana and it wasn’t an accident. My husband joined me and thinking this was very obvious and then my parents basically fell over with shock that we would believe such an outlandish thing. It’s not a topic I haven’t thought much about this in years but now gets me wondering, do most people agree that Diana’s death wasn’t an accident or is it truly one of those outlandish things that the general public accepts that she was chased by paparazzi and killed accidently?

Wow. Just how stupid are you?

[Anonymous]

I hear what you're saying yet think it was an accident, because killing someone through a car accident isn't a sure thing unless explosives are involved (like the Russian woman who was recently killed instead of her dad).

[Anonymous]

I’m trying to understand being a mom to two young children and not wearing a seatbelt. Nope. Can’t do it.

A terrible accident exacerbated by multiple irresponsible decisions (on multiple people’s parts).