You seem to be confused. Those reactions by teachers (and you're believing people on the Internet are who they say they are, but I digress) are valid and based on perceptions of safety and self-preservation and preservation of others. It has nothing to do with political ideology. Kids who went maskless weren't facing segregation because they were conservative, the were facing segregation because they represented a potential danger to others, including their peers. It was perfectly fine for teachers to resent the little shits for it, too. But it had zero to do with political ideology. |
I'm going to agree with this. What I'm picking up is the OP's kid presented a fairly superficial argument. And when the teachers says he doesn't agree with the thesis, OP's kid is interpretating that as "i hate LGBTQ people." That's probably not what the teacher is saying at all. It's not good enough in a persuasive argument to note that there are people with opposing views. It's typical to present those opposing views and make arguments about them. This really isn't hard to do vis a vis noting that people have religious objections to LGTBQ people, but we are a secular society and we are governed by a Constitution and not the Bible. Or get into a discussion of moral versus ethical. But if all OP's kid did was argue that LGTBQ people deserve equal rights without taking the opposite view head-on, I can see why the paper might get a low grade. |
Lets agree that's true. It is also irrelevant. The teacher did NOT assign the topic. The student chose it. If you are asked to pick a topic and present opposing viewpoints, then the student failed to fullfill the terms of the assignment by picking a topic on which there are not morally acceptable opposing viewpoints. Could it be that this is what happened? Even if we go further and ASSUME that the teacher is one of the horrible awful really bad people who holds what the student thinks is an immoral opinion, the student has STILL failed to fullfill the assignment. Lets say that instead the the teacher was one of the annointed, i.e., the teacher shared the student's views. The teacher should still fail the student because he or she failed to fullfill the assignment. You can't avoid getting a bad grade on an assignment that requires you to present an opposing view by CHOOSING a topic for which there is no opposing viewpoint. |
|
A teacher * |
Let's get back on topic.
OP, this is the suggestion I'd give to my kid, given the following considerations: - there are less than three months left in the school year; - this teacher will be giving the kid a final grade; and - the kid is in high school and will need to face this issue in college on their own at some point. Suggestion: 1. Let the kid make the decision about next steps. Suggest action steps but don't demand. - Action step 1.Request an opportunity to re-submit the paper for a better grade, addressing the comments made on the paper. - Action step 2. If approved, address the edits, re-submit the paper - Action step 3. If not approved, make best attempt to get a better grade on next paper. If that paper is also scored low, bring both papers to administration for review. Do not send and email. Do this in person if possible. As it is very close to the end of the year, and the teacher has personality flaws, I would not have my kid risk their grade to prove a point. |
Conclusion. OP's kid is too stupid to think for himself. |