Because it is very likely that it is not the teacher bias but as other posters have already pointed out it is the failure to include the counter argument and properly explain it. That is the point of the assignment and if it isn't done, that's going to lower the grade. The best approach if the student really wants to work through the issue, is to sit down with the teacher and have the teacher explain the reasoning for the grade, the student to LISTEN and not defend, take notes and then read back to the teacher what the issue was to confirm their understanding. |
Yes, teach people to just acquiesce even when the person in authority is/may very well be wrong. Nothing bad ever comes from that. Sycophants to Trump didn't harm anything and didn't lead any of them into any negative publicity, public ire, or legal trouble. Obedience to ridiculous or tyrannical laws out of fear of Hitler or Stalin's wrath never led to anything bad. I admire the courage and bravery of Russians publicly protesting Putin's actions on Ukraine - they are doing so out of a sense of right and wrong in spite of knowing full well what becomes of Putin's critics and enemies. Yes, absolutely OP's child should not bother to get a third party objective opinion of her work if they have any reason at all to believe something inappropriate took place. And they should absolutely continue to just "read" their teachers and classmates and bosses and colleagues and play along like a sheep throughout their academic and professional careers. That's what makes a great, courageous, effective individual to be admired by history for their contributions to society. Just like our country's forefathers, MLK Jr, FDR, etc etc etc. Acquiesce!!! |
From OP's original post: "When she tried to inquire with the teacher the teacher was very defensive and kept coming back to the point that the teacher did not agree with the thesis. The teacher also came down on DC for not presenting the other view point which is that LGBT rights are not a good thing. DC did mention that there is opposition from some groups, especially religious groups, but it was not half her paper because the assignment was not to present all sides of an issue but to pick a moment and make an argument about it." Again, the student DID talk to the teacher! Perhaps the student could focus more on the teacher's indication that they needed to present more of the other side's argument rather than just mentioning that there are people who oppose; but it is unclear from OP's post that this was the sole problem with the grading or their understanding of the scores against each rubric. Teachers do make mistakes sometimes. Some teachers do let their personal biases influence their grading sometimes. It is not always the student who is in the wrong. Maybe the student in this situation is; but I don't understand so many people here being adamantly against the student or their desire to clarify a significant concern. |
For those of you who think teacher's don't have bias or negative feelings for students, did you even take a peek in the thread that was titled something like "when your kids stop wearing masks, are you afraid teachers will treat them negatively?" There were plenty of teachers on there confirming that yes, they WOULD treat those kids differently... separating them, being harsher on them during grading, and having an overall negative opinion of them and their parents.
And the threads about if kids are dropping masks, one thing has been repeated several times: kids don't want to drop masks b/c they don't want to be viewed as one of those "anti-mask" kids who were so vocal about getting the mandate dropped. The kids know they'll be viewed and treated differently, too. |
Oh Lord, talk about being confused. Practicing safe health and physical distancing because a student is unmasked is completely different from grading a paper. Even I as a parent get that. |
lol. I love how reality and satire have converged to the point we cannot tell one from the other. |
A well written essay supporting segregation might not be well received either without the other viewpoint. |
Uhhh, are you claiming that unmasked children are "unsafe" ![]() Talk about being confused. |
Yes, I was 100% being sarcastic. Not about the conservative teacher thing -- there are A LOT OF THEM, including in Arlington. This notion of liberal teachers indoctrinating kids is such a trope. My sarcasm was aimed at Youngkin's tattle line. We don't need a bloody Stasi state. Your child, meanwhile, should toughen up. Either have faith in his convictions or be prepared to depend them or don't have them -- he's being a sissy if he feels "discomfort" because others challenge views he cannot defend. |
The someone who opposes wokeism is also sharing their sexuality and orientation, are they not? Whatever is your idiotic point? What is "wokeism" anyway? I don't understand that term. What does it mean? |
Depends on where you are. You may also be confusing promoting "common decency" and "tolerance" with being "liberal." |
Whoa. You shouldn't be allowed near children. |
And that would be wrong! There's nothing inherently better about including 'both sides' on issues that involve basic human/civil rights. Do we do 'both sides' on the holocaust too? On the Rwandan genocide? There are some issues where you don't have to have a counterargument that is an opposing view. You might have a counterargument on the range of impacts, the effectiveness of different policies etc. But you don't have to kowtow to people who say gay people don't deserve rights or the holocaust didn't happen because their perspectives don't warrant a seat at the rational table. |
Yeah. Because "tolerant left" doesn't have most people doubles over in a laughing fit. |
I'm sure that's true. I'm sure it's equally true they aren't trolling school boards and whining on message boards about liberal indoctrination in schools and complaining about CRT and "wokeism." If they are doing the LATTER, than the former is actually not true at all and they aren't "conservative." They are "radical, anti-American, right wing nut jobs." There is a difference. I have no problem with conservatives. Want to argue about the size of the military industrial complex and capital gains tax policy? Great, let's do it. But the other stuff? No, that isn't a valid way of thinking. |