That is true in every jurisdiction. |
Size for MS/HS but elementary is so dependent on specific school. The teachers at ours really make it. But it's also grade dependent ie K and 4th was good, 3rd sucked. Both our kids had the MOST amazing K teachers. We are in private schools now and I'm going to say that those 2 K teachers were still the best both my kids are is MS and 5th grade now.
In terms of ACPS in general, the whole equity thing is ridiculous. They want everyone to achieve to mediocrity. If you do better, it doesn't matter. So you'll never have a great school just them wanting to pretend they don't suck. In terms of public education, you tend to find this par for the course but esp for ACPS the testing is out of control. I think APS does it a bit differently where you may still need to test but ACPS just blatantly has weeks of testing. No homework, no teaching happens, just testing weeks at a time. Hate it. I don't know that any of the publics are really great. I agree with PP about the fact that private is a stone's throw away. Expensive but avail if you really need it (like us!) so you really just leave for MS to go private when you need or of course, even before if you'd like. People talk about how great APS is but I think post COVID, they even have lost a lot of their shiny reputation and overcrowding was always a sore point there. FCPS is another system people talk about being great but that's a huge territory and it depends on what location/school you speak of. In general, my understanding is that FCPS is well run but I still feel that there are specific schools that suck. Finally, ACPS has TAG which is supposed to be phased out in the near future. The biggest thing about this program is that getting into it is a horrid experience. Unless your kid happens to test really well, the measurements for the program are wrong - they don't select kids who show that TAG potential and have the ability to learn - they rely simply on test scores. The TAG program itself is also to me not worth it. The exception is that in math, you get the opportunity to get ahead in prep for MS - they fit 2 years into 1 but for reading, it's just more tests. On some level the regular classes are almost better. We pulled our kids out late in elementary and probably could have stuck it out until end. I think on the whole they are better off leaving for private earlier but I can't say it was horrible. The curriculum sucks but the teachers didn't. The whole idea of 20 min to talk to 2 teachers for parent teacher conf is also a big joke. There are def better schools in APS, FCPS, LCPS and FCC where in ACPS that probably numbers 2-3 tops elementary schools. |
It makes me so mad that this city keeps approving more and more housing developments while failing to address overcrowding. This just adds to the problem. |
We haven't found it to be just more tests for reading. My child had essays and projects. It was fairly vigorous, to the extent that I considered pulling him out of the program (he does test well, but has ADHD, and is a lot more interested in math than language arts. All of the language arts projects were sort of a drag). I agree that the testing to get in is not a great way to go. My child had friends that could have definitely done TAG, but did not test in. His TAG classes were mostly white kids, with a few exceptions. They need to find a way to give more minority students the ability to participate. |
PP here. Fair enough re: my comparison. ![]() What do you mean by lost in the shuffle? We've had to teach/encourage our daughter to advocate for herself, but we see that as a positive learning experience rather than a negative result of student body sizes. |
To those complaining about the testing, just pull your kids out of the tests. We did. Less stress on the kid and it sends a message to the school. |
But more tests still mean less instructional time and a focus on teaching to the test. That affects kids who opt out of the testing as well. |
Democracy breeds mediocrity. |
I lived there and went private too. I found that no one really was invested in improving the public schools so they never improved. Everyone who has money goes parochial or private |
Sorry if my post was confusing - I was just pointing out that LCTA seems to consistantly turn out lovely kids from many different backgrounds and circumstances. How do I know this? Starting a few years ago grads of Lyles Crouch are invited back prior to their HS graduation to take part in an LCTA assembly where they share their plans for after college and favorite memories from LCTA. While I'm pretty sure many ACPS elementary schools do this, having now been for both of my kids, I was amazed by not only the high number of students that return, but the number of parents too. TC offers a bus, but word gets out and many private school kids and kids that have moved away return for the event as well. ACPS get's a lot of bad press, but here is an example of lots of happy memories and accomplished young people thankful for their ES years and teachers. |
That's not remotely true. There are plenty of kids from wealthy families at ACHS. |
Define 'wealthy' If you're talking about the dme a dozen two fed families making 350k HHI, sure, there are tons of them. But, the families with the HHI exceeding a million almost all go private. |
I think that households making million+ a year would go private, no matter the school district. |
![]() Sure. And I'm reasonably sure that the public schools are no worse off for their loss. |
If only local politicians had to foresight to require the DoD to set aside some land for a school or two at the Cameron Station development before they sold the land to the developer who was probably the brother of the DoD person in charge. |