Gaithersburg ES #8 boundary recommendation

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It's actually both. Neelsville MS is nearby a few neighborhoods that are bused elsewhere and it's far away from the neighborhoods that are bused to Neelsville MS. Now you're getting it!

Before the recent boundary change, every neighborhood assigned to Neelsville MS was bused to Neelsville MS.

In contrast, now, after the boundary change, every neighborhood assigned to Neelsville MS is bused to Neelsville MS.

The boundary change is over, kids are at their new schools, people have moved on - yet here you still are.

Great. Can we get the far-left to shut up about redlining now because it's over?

And after I steal your car, will you shut up about it because it's over?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It's actually both. Neelsville MS is nearby a few neighborhoods that are bused elsewhere and it's far away from the neighborhoods that are bused to Neelsville MS. Now you're getting it!

Before the recent boundary change, every neighborhood assigned to Neelsville MS was bused to Neelsville MS.

In contrast, now, after the boundary change, every neighborhood assigned to Neelsville MS is bused to Neelsville MS.

The boundary change is over, kids are at their new schools, people have moved on - yet here you still are.

If people want to talk about it - let them talk about it.

If you don't like the thread - it's you that needs to move on.

People who? It's one poster with an obsession.

+1. And that poster likes to obsess about Neelsville on threads that aren't related to Neelsville, such as threads about Gaithersburg ES #8.

I'm the poster who first brought up Neelsville so I hope you're not talking about me. All I said was that there are whacky boundaries everywhere in MCPS and used Neelsville as an example (not a false statement). You or some other poster then became defensive about that comment and brought up the upcounty study and provided the minutiae on how the alternative options wouldn't have worked. That sounds obsessive to me.

Nope, you definitely sound obsessive. The other poster sounds informative.

Obsessive for bringing up a fact that you cannot handle? Sounds like you're just butt hurt because you can't handle the truth.

The truth is that you try to hiack every thread that mentions school boundaries so you can complain about the Neelsville and Seneca Valley boundaries that were settled two years ago.

How about this for the truth- you are convincing yourself that you know the intentions of anonymous posters. YOU brought up the upcounty boundary study. NOT ME.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
And after I steal your car, will you shut up about it because it's over?

MCPS school boundary changes =/= car theft

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It's actually both. Neelsville MS is nearby a few neighborhoods that are bused elsewhere and it's far away from the neighborhoods that are bused to Neelsville MS. Now you're getting it!

Before the recent boundary change, every neighborhood assigned to Neelsville MS was bused to Neelsville MS.

In contrast, now, after the boundary change, every neighborhood assigned to Neelsville MS is bused to Neelsville MS.

The boundary change is over, kids are at their new schools, people have moved on - yet here you still are.

If people want to talk about it - let them talk about it.

If you don't like the thread - it's you that needs to move on.

People who? It's one poster with an obsession.

+1. And that poster likes to obsess about Neelsville on threads that aren't related to Neelsville, such as threads about Gaithersburg ES #8.

I'm the poster who first brought up Neelsville so I hope you're not talking about me. All I said was that there are whacky boundaries everywhere in MCPS and used Neelsville as an example (not a false statement). You or some other poster then became defensive about that comment and brought up the upcounty study and provided the minutiae on how the alternative options wouldn't have worked. That sounds obsessive to me.

Nope, you definitely sound obsessive. The other poster sounds informative.

Obsessive for bringing up a fact that you cannot handle? Sounds like you're just butt hurt because you can't handle the truth.

The truth is that you try to hiack every thread that mentions school boundaries so you can complain about the Neelsville and Seneca Valley boundaries that were settled two years ago.

How about this for the truth- you are convincing yourself that you know the intentions of anonymous posters. YOU brought up the upcounty boundary study. NOT ME.

No, that wasn't me. You're bickering with more than one poster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It's actually both. Neelsville MS is nearby a few neighborhoods that are bused elsewhere and it's far away from the neighborhoods that are bused to Neelsville MS. Now you're getting it!

Before the recent boundary change, every neighborhood assigned to Neelsville MS was bused to Neelsville MS.

In contrast, now, after the boundary change, every neighborhood assigned to Neelsville MS is bused to Neelsville MS.

The boundary change is over, kids are at their new schools, people have moved on - yet here you still are.

If people want to talk about it - let them talk about it.

If you don't like the thread - it's you that needs to move on.

People who? It's one poster with an obsession.

+1. And that poster likes to obsess about Neelsville on threads that aren't related to Neelsville, such as threads about Gaithersburg ES #8.

I'm the poster who first brought up Neelsville so I hope you're not talking about me. All I said was that there are whacky boundaries everywhere in MCPS and used Neelsville as an example (not a false statement). You or some other poster then became defensive about that comment and brought up the upcounty study and provided the minutiae on how the alternative options wouldn't have worked. That sounds obsessive to me.

Nope, you definitely sound obsessive. The other poster sounds informative.

Obsessive for bringing up a fact that you cannot handle? Sounds like you're just butt hurt because you can't handle the truth.

The truth is that you try to hiack every thread that mentions school boundaries so you can complain about the Neelsville and Seneca Valley boundaries that were settled two years ago.

How about this for the truth- you are convincing yourself that you know the intentions of anonymous posters. YOU brought up the upcounty boundary study. NOT ME.

No, that wasn't me. You're bickering with more than one poster.

Uh no. I'm bickering with you. I wasn't bickering with anyone about the upcounty boundary study. You're intentionally putting that on me and I don't know why.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
And after I steal your car, will you shut up about it because it's over?

MCPS school boundary changes =/= car theft

Ah, the joy of quoting out of context. It was also a response to someone who said redlining is over.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It's actually both. Neelsville MS is nearby a few neighborhoods that are bused elsewhere and it's far away from the neighborhoods that are bused to Neelsville MS. Now you're getting it!

Before the recent boundary change, every neighborhood assigned to Neelsville MS was bused to Neelsville MS.

In contrast, now, after the boundary change, every neighborhood assigned to Neelsville MS is bused to Neelsville MS.

The boundary change is over, kids are at their new schools, people have moved on - yet here you still are.

Great. Can we get the far-left to shut up about redlining now because it's over?

And after I steal your car, will you shut up about it because it's over?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It's actually both. Neelsville MS is nearby a few neighborhoods that are bused elsewhere and it's far away from the neighborhoods that are bused to Neelsville MS. Now you're getting it!

Before the recent boundary change, every neighborhood assigned to Neelsville MS was bused to Neelsville MS.

In contrast, now, after the boundary change, every neighborhood assigned to Neelsville MS is bused to Neelsville MS.

The boundary change is over, kids are at their new schools, people have moved on - yet here you still are.

If people want to talk about it - let them talk about it.

If you don't like the thread - it's you that needs to move on.

People who? It's one poster with an obsession.

+1. And that poster likes to obsess about Neelsville on threads that aren't related to Neelsville, such as threads about Gaithersburg ES #8.

I'm the poster who first brought up Neelsville so I hope you're not talking about me. All I said was that there are whacky boundaries everywhere in MCPS and used Neelsville as an example (not a false statement). You or some other poster then became defensive about that comment and brought up the upcounty study and provided the minutiae on how the alternative options wouldn't have worked. That sounds obsessive to me.

Nope, you definitely sound obsessive. The other poster sounds informative.

Obsessive for bringing up a fact that you cannot handle? Sounds like you're just butt hurt because you can't handle the truth.

The truth is that you try to hiack every thread that mentions school boundaries so you can complain about the Neelsville and Seneca Valley boundaries that were settled two years ago.

How about this for the truth- you are convincing yourself that you know the intentions of anonymous posters. YOU brought up the upcounty boundary study. NOT ME.

No, that wasn't me. You're bickering with more than one poster.

Uh no. I'm bickering with you. I wasn't bickering with anyone about the upcounty boundary study. You're intentionally putting that on me and I don't know why.

11/19/2021 13:54 was the first complaint on this thread about Neelsville's boundaries, which were redrawn in the upcounty boundary study.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
It's actually both. Neelsville MS is nearby a few neighborhoods that are bused elsewhere and it's far away from the neighborhoods that are bused to Neelsville MS. Now you're getting it!

Before the recent boundary change, every neighborhood assigned to Neelsville MS was bused to Neelsville MS.

In contrast, now, after the boundary change, every neighborhood assigned to Neelsville MS is bused to Neelsville MS.

The boundary change is over, kids are at their new schools, people have moved on - yet here you still are.

If people want to talk about it - let them talk about it.

If you don't like the thread - it's you that needs to move on.

People who? It's one poster with an obsession.

+1. And that poster likes to obsess about Neelsville on threads that aren't related to Neelsville, such as threads about Gaithersburg ES #8.

I'm the poster who first brought up Neelsville so I hope you're not talking about me. All I said was that there are whacky boundaries everywhere in MCPS and used Neelsville as an example (not a false statement). You or some other poster then became defensive about that comment and brought up the upcounty study and provided the minutiae on how the alternative options wouldn't have worked. That sounds obsessive to me.

Nope, you definitely sound obsessive. The other poster sounds informative.

Obsessive for bringing up a fact that you cannot handle? Sounds like you're just butt hurt because you can't handle the truth.

The truth is that you try to hiack every thread that mentions school boundaries so you can complain about the Neelsville and Seneca Valley boundaries that were settled two years ago.

How about this for the truth- you are convincing yourself that you know the intentions of anonymous posters. YOU brought up the upcounty boundary study. NOT ME.

No, that wasn't me. You're bickering with more than one poster.

Uh no. I'm bickering with you. I wasn't bickering with anyone about the upcounty boundary study. You're intentionally putting that on me and I don't know why.

11/19/2021 13:54 was the first complaint on this thread about Neelsville's boundaries, which were redrawn in the upcounty boundary study.

Yes, that was me. I said there are non-sensical boundaries in schools all over MCPS, and provided Neelsville as one example. Period. When did I mention the upcounty boundary study?