Epstein Files

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Trump is now an alleged baby killer. Pro lifers, how do we feel about this one? Is it ok to commit “post birth abortion” if Trump might be the daddy?

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00025010.pdf


Trump allegedly witnessed 13 year old's infant murdered immediately following birth. She was trafficked to Epstein by her uncle. From how it reads it appears that labor was brought non while sexual activity was going on. It's beyond disturbing

https://www.livemint.com/news/us-news/donald-trump-witnessed-infanticide-during-jeffrey-epsteins-sex-trafficking-crimes-doj-documents-share-chilling-details-11766539533049.html


Not defending Chump but that's an Indian website. In fact, all the sites that talk about this are tabloid sites, most from India. India is not quite known for reporting the truth nor is it a civilized country or a democracy.

The previous statement is not racist. Do some research. Indians do coordinated attacks online and in person against anyone who uncovers truths about India(ns) that shines India(ns) in a negative light. The recent rioting against Bangladesh is the latest example.


Redacted file from FBI

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet+8/EFTA00025010.pdf


That's a document from 2020 following up on an initial accusation from 2020 about an incident that occurred in 1984. 2020 was the Trump reelection campaign year where there was a lot of dirty politics going on. Where's the journalism reporting on this? Where's the followup? At this point, it's just hearsay and basically a hit piece. Unless there's an article that I missed not from India or a wacko christian "business news" site.

Chump is not a good person. Neither are the other rich and powerful all-white people in the Epstein circle. But this accusation is sloppy and unprofessional, and if proven false, will only further the argument that "people" are out to get Chump.


Trump controlled the DPJ and FBI in 2020. What is your point?


The point is that the story is salacious and potentially libelous without verified sources which can be found through journalistic investigation. Just the fact that a 13 year old gave natural birth and the delivery was performed by a bunch of old men sounds extremely dangerous and it's not like they dropped her off at the local ER. Perhaps there could be physical evidence of lasting skeletal damage that could be determined through an x-ray?

Also, other facts that could be verified:
- that Chump was on a plane to the middle of nowhere and back
- Chump was in Michigan during the time period
- the same Democrat Michigan governor (who doesn't like Chump) has been in office since 2019 so state police could have investigated
- I mean, they could probably ask Michael Cohen to verify it, although his credibility is not the best

Again. Not defending Chump. But people need to do some investigating instead of jumping to conclusions, which is exactly how you sink a case.


Don’t bother PP. This is just Russia Russia Russia 2026 version.


That statement isn't the "own" you think it is.

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Trump is now an alleged baby killer. Pro lifers, how do we feel about this one? Is it ok to commit “post birth abortion” if Trump might be the daddy?

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00025010.pdf


Trump allegedly witnessed 13 year old's infant murdered immediately following birth. She was trafficked to Epstein by her uncle. From how it reads it appears that labor was brought non while sexual activity was going on. It's beyond disturbing

https://www.livemint.com/news/us-news/donald-trump-witnessed-infanticide-during-jeffrey-epsteins-sex-trafficking-crimes-doj-documents-share-chilling-details-11766539533049.html


Not defending Chump but that's an Indian website. In fact, all the sites that talk about this are tabloid sites, most from India. India is not quite known for reporting the truth nor is it a civilized country or a democracy.

The previous statement is not racist. Do some research. Indians do coordinated attacks online and in person against anyone who uncovers truths about India(ns) that shines India(ns) in a negative light. The recent rioting against Bangladesh is the latest example.


Redacted file from FBI

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet+8/EFTA00025010.pdf


That's a document from 2020 following up on an initial accusation from 2020 about an incident that occurred in 1984. 2020 was the Trump reelection campaign year where there was a lot of dirty politics going on. Where's the journalism reporting on this? Where's the followup? At this point, it's just hearsay and basically a hit piece. Unless there's an article that I missed not from India or a wacko christian "business news" site.

Chump is not a good person. Neither are the other rich and powerful all-white people in the Epstein circle. But this accusation is sloppy and unprofessional, and if proven false, will only further the argument that "people" are out to get Chump.


Trump controlled the DPJ and FBI in 2020. What is your point?


The point is that the story is salacious and potentially libelous without verified sources which can be found through journalistic investigation. Just the fact that a 13 year old gave natural birth and the delivery was performed by a bunch of old men sounds extremely dangerous and it's not like they dropped her off at the local ER. Perhaps there could be physical evidence of lasting skeletal damage that could be determined through an x-ray?

Also, other facts that could be verified:
- that Chump was on a plane to the middle of nowhere and back
- Chump was in Michigan during the time period
- the same Democrat Michigan governor (who doesn't like Chump) has been in office since 2019 so state police could have investigated
- I mean, they could probably ask Michael Cohen to verify it, although his credibility is not the best

Again. Not defending Chump. But people need to do some investigating instead of jumping to conclusions, which is exactly how you sink a case.


Don’t bother PP. This is just Russia Russia Russia 2026 version.


Russia, Russia, Russia...you're not Trump, you sound like such a cornball.
Anonymous
Russian influence operations, disinfo and psyops is a real and proven thing, operating on a significant scale, and targeting not only our elections but many others in Europe and Africa and other areas. The fact that Republicans don't even want to acknowledge it, let alone deal with it, and deflect with "Russia Russia Russia" is in and of itself a national security issue.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Russian influence operations, disinfo and psyops is a real and proven thing, operating on a significant scale, and targeting not only our elections but many others in Europe and Africa and other areas. The fact that Republicans don't even want to acknowledge it, let alone deal with it, and deflect with "Russia Russia Russia" is in and of itself a national security issue.


It’s sad watching them get played so hard. It would be hilarious if it didn’t affect the country, but I bet that a lot of them get taken by Nigerian Prince scams, too, and that’s kind of entertaining.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Russian influence operations, disinfo and psyops is a real and proven thing, operating on a significant scale, and targeting not only our elections but many others in Europe and Africa and other areas. The fact that Republicans don't even want to acknowledge it, let alone deal with it, and deflect with "Russia Russia Russia" is in and of itself a national security issue.


Everyone knows there are Russian psyops just like there are American psyops. The question is the crazed Russia “collusion” thing that obsessed the left and was mostly fiction (remember the “pee tapes”?). Trump is bad enough without making up dumb sh*t. If anything these fantasies are more likely actually planted and promoted by Russia to make Dems look stupid.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Russian influence operations, disinfo and psyops is a real and proven thing, operating on a significant scale, and targeting not only our elections but many others in Europe and Africa and other areas. The fact that Republicans don't even want to acknowledge it, let alone deal with it, and deflect with "Russia Russia Russia" is in and of itself a national security issue.


Everyone knows there are Russian psyops just like there are American psyops. The question is the crazed Russia “collusion” thing that obsessed the left and was mostly fiction (remember the “pee tapes”?). Trump is bad enough without making up dumb sh*t. If anything these fantasies are more likely actually planted and promoted by Russia to make Dems look stupid.


Copium is a terrible drug.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Trump is now an alleged baby killer. Pro lifers, how do we feel about this one? Is it ok to commit “post birth abortion” if Trump might be the daddy?

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%208/EFTA00025010.pdf


Trump allegedly witnessed 13 year old's infant murdered immediately following birth. She was trafficked to Epstein by her uncle. From how it reads it appears that labor was brought non while sexual activity was going on. It's beyond disturbing

https://www.livemint.com/news/us-news/donald-trump-witnessed-infanticide-during-jeffrey-epsteins-sex-trafficking-crimes-doj-documents-share-chilling-details-11766539533049.html


Not defending Chump but that's an Indian website. In fact, all the sites that talk about this are tabloid sites, most from India. India is not quite known for reporting the truth nor is it a civilized country or a democracy.

The previous statement is not racist. Do some research. Indians do coordinated attacks online and in person against anyone who uncovers truths about India(ns) that shines India(ns) in a negative light. The recent rioting against Bangladesh is the latest example.


Redacted file from FBI

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet+8/EFTA00025010.pdf


That's a document from 2020 following up on an initial accusation from 2020 about an incident that occurred in 1984. 2020 was the Trump reelection campaign year where there was a lot of dirty politics going on. Where's the journalism reporting on this? Where's the followup? At this point, it's just hearsay and basically a hit piece. Unless there's an article that I missed not from India or a wacko christian "business news" site.

Chump is not a good person. Neither are the other rich and powerful all-white people in the Epstein circle. But this accusation is sloppy and unprofessional, and if proven false, will only further the argument that "people" are out to get Chump.


This is why we can't have nice things. People holding up the oligarchy. The patriarchy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Russian influence operations, disinfo and psyops is a real and proven thing, operating on a significant scale, and targeting not only our elections but many others in Europe and Africa and other areas. The fact that Republicans don't even want to acknowledge it, let alone deal with it, and deflect with "Russia Russia Russia" is in and of itself a national security issue.


Everyone knows there are Russian psyops just like there are American psyops. The question is the crazed Russia “collusion” thing that obsessed the left and was mostly fiction (remember the “pee tapes”?). Trump is bad enough without making up dumb sh*t. If anything these fantasies are more likely actually planted and promoted by Russia to make Dems look stupid.


MAGA's “Russia hoax” narrative only survives by pretending the Steele dossier and a rumored pee tape are the whole story. They aren’t.

The FBI opened its investigation before even hearing about the Steele Dossier, after a Trump adviser bragged that Russia had “dirt” in the form of stolen emails. Trump’s team then held a “love it” meeting for “Russia and its government’s support,” his campaign chair with deep Russian ties shared internal polling with a suspected intel asset, Flynn lied about secret sanctions talks with the Russian ambassador, Sessions lied about meetings with the same ambassador, and Trump publicly sided with Putin over U.S. intelligence in Helsinki.

Add years of Russian money flowing into Trump properties and a secret Trump Tower Moscow project during the campaign, and you don’t even need a pee tape to see the problem.

Mueller didn’t charge a criminal conspiracy, but he absolutely did not say "nothing happened."

Calling all of that "mostly fiction" or saying "stupid Dems" isn’t critical thinking; it’s closing your eyes to a specific, lengthy, well-documented foreign influence operation that our own intel community and a Republican-led Senate committee have already laid out in excruciating detail.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Russian influence operations, disinfo and psyops is a real and proven thing, operating on a significant scale, and targeting not only our elections but many others in Europe and Africa and other areas. The fact that Republicans don't even want to acknowledge it, let alone deal with it, and deflect with "Russia Russia Russia" is in and of itself a national security issue.


Everyone knows there are Russian psyops just like there are American psyops. The question is the crazed Russia “collusion” thing that obsessed the left and was mostly fiction (remember the “pee tapes”?). Trump is bad enough without making up dumb sh*t. If anything these fantasies are more likely actually planted and promoted by Russia to make Dems look stupid.


Yeah sure, "American psyops" like we're supposed to understand that the Ukrainian Rada vote to join the EU was fake and somehow Victoria Nuland waved a magic wand and turned "overwhelmingly pro-Russia" Ukraine into over 100,000 protesters in the streets demanding Yanukovich's ouster. The narrative I hear about what happened in Ukraine coming from pro-Russia people is absolutely hilarious.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Russian influence operations, disinfo and psyops is a real and proven thing, operating on a significant scale, and targeting not only our elections but many others in Europe and Africa and other areas. The fact that Republicans don't even want to acknowledge it, let alone deal with it, and deflect with "Russia Russia Russia" is in and of itself a national security issue.


Everyone knows there are Russian psyops just like there are American psyops. The question is the crazed Russia “collusion” thing that obsessed the left and was mostly fiction (remember the “pee tapes”?). Trump is bad enough without making up dumb sh*t. If anything these fantasies are more likely actually planted and promoted by Russia to make Dems look stupid.


It's not about obsessing the left. Agents of Russia have taken over our instruments of government and our turning our country into a Russian style oligarchy.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:If Hilary Clinton’s billion dollar campaign couldn’t overcome a few unprofessional online ads by the Russians, then she should have hired a better campaign manager.

This is why so many dems support endless war in Ukraine. It is not because they care about the Ukrainian people. It’s part of their demented quest to get Putin back for supposedly costing Hilary Clinton the 2016 election.


It wasn't a few unprofessional ads. It was a systematic takedown of the candidate. There was no email issue, that was a right wing fantasy that resulted in zero charges or criminal wrongdoing. The hack of the RNC and DNC servers and subsequent weaponization of DnC emails resulting in millions of ads being poured on social media, mostly facebook, resulted in enough tipped votes to turn the election. Add to it the NY FBI office (that Giuliani "owned") further weaponizing the emails issue with the stupid laptop that quelled the actual Access Hollywood tapes that illustrate a lot if the issues we have today, and again, yielded no new information, no new emails and no criminality.

Somehow, Zuckerberg and Kushner uses the Facebook platform to brainwash millions of Americans and the problem has only gotten worse.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/stevenbertoni/2016/11/22/exclusive-interview-how-jared-kushner-won-trump-the-white-house/

And if you think Russia was a hoax, the GOP Senate sure didn't:

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/2020/08/18/publications-report-select-committee-intelligence-united-states-senate-russian-active-measures/

- penned by none other than Marco Rubio
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Russian influence operations, disinfo and psyops is a real and proven thing, operating on a significant scale, and targeting not only our elections but many others in Europe and Africa and other areas. The fact that Republicans don't even want to acknowledge it, let alone deal with it, and deflect with "Russia Russia Russia" is in and of itself a national security issue.


Everyone knows there are Russian psyops just like there are American psyops. The question is the crazed Russia “collusion” thing that obsessed the left and was mostly fiction (remember the “pee tapes”?). Trump is bad enough without making up dumb sh*t. If anything these fantasies are more likely actually planted and promoted by Russia to make Dems look stupid.


MAGA's “Russia hoax” narrative only survives by pretending the Steele dossier and a rumored pee tape are the whole story. They aren’t.

The FBI opened its investigation before even hearing about the Steele Dossier, after a Trump adviser bragged that Russia had “dirt” in the form of stolen emails. Trump’s team then held a “love it” meeting for “Russia and its government’s support,” his campaign chair with deep Russian ties shared internal polling with a suspected intel asset, Flynn lied about secret sanctions talks with the Russian ambassador, Sessions lied about meetings with the same ambassador, and Trump publicly sided with Putin over U.S. intelligence in Helsinki.

Add years of Russian money flowing into Trump properties and a secret Trump Tower Moscow project during the campaign, and you don’t even need a pee tape to see the problem.

Mueller didn’t charge a criminal conspiracy, but he absolutely did not say "nothing happened."

Calling all of that "mostly fiction" or saying "stupid Dems" isn’t critical thinking; it’s closing your eyes to a specific, lengthy, well-documented foreign influence operation that our own intel community and a Republican-led Senate committee have already laid out in excruciating detail.


Ok. But the idea that Trump murdered a 13 year old girl’s baby with Epstein is about as dumb as the pee tapes.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Russian influence operations, disinfo and psyops is a real and proven thing, operating on a significant scale, and targeting not only our elections but many others in Europe and Africa and other areas. The fact that Republicans don't even want to acknowledge it, let alone deal with it, and deflect with "Russia Russia Russia" is in and of itself a national security issue.


Everyone knows there are Russian psyops just like there are American psyops. The question is the crazed Russia “collusion” thing that obsessed the left and was mostly fiction (remember the “pee tapes”?). Trump is bad enough without making up dumb sh*t. If anything these fantasies are more likely actually planted and promoted by Russia to make Dems look stupid.


MAGA's “Russia hoax” narrative only survives by pretending the Steele dossier and a rumored pee tape are the whole story. They aren’t.

The FBI opened its investigation before even hearing about the Steele Dossier, after a Trump adviser bragged that Russia had “dirt” in the form of stolen emails. Trump’s team then held a “love it” meeting for “Russia and its government’s support,” his campaign chair with deep Russian ties shared internal polling with a suspected intel asset, Flynn lied about secret sanctions talks with the Russian ambassador, Sessions lied about meetings with the same ambassador, and Trump publicly sided with Putin over U.S. intelligence in Helsinki.

Add years of Russian money flowing into Trump properties and a secret Trump Tower Moscow project during the campaign, and you don’t even need a pee tape to see the problem.

Mueller didn’t charge a criminal conspiracy, but he absolutely did not say "nothing happened."

Calling all of that "mostly fiction" or saying "stupid Dems" isn’t critical thinking; it’s closing your eyes to a specific, lengthy, well-documented foreign influence operation that our own intel community and a Republican-led Senate committee have already laid out in excruciating detail.


Ok. But the idea that Trump murdered a 13 year old girl’s baby with Epstein is about as dumb as the pee tapes.


Knowing everything that we now know now about Trump, what makes you sure that either of those scenarios are dumb?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Russian influence operations, disinfo and psyops is a real and proven thing, operating on a significant scale, and targeting not only our elections but many others in Europe and Africa and other areas. The fact that Republicans don't even want to acknowledge it, let alone deal with it, and deflect with "Russia Russia Russia" is in and of itself a national security issue.


Everyone knows there are Russian psyops just like there are American psyops. The question is the crazed Russia “collusion” thing that obsessed the left and was mostly fiction (remember the “pee tapes”?). Trump is bad enough without making up dumb sh*t. If anything these fantasies are more likely actually planted and promoted by Russia to make Dems look stupid.


MAGA's “Russia hoax” narrative only survives by pretending the Steele dossier and a rumored pee tape are the whole story. They aren’t.

The FBI opened its investigation before even hearing about the Steele Dossier, after a Trump adviser bragged that Russia had “dirt” in the form of stolen emails. Trump’s team then held a “love it” meeting for “Russia and its government’s support,” his campaign chair with deep Russian ties shared internal polling with a suspected intel asset, Flynn lied about secret sanctions talks with the Russian ambassador, Sessions lied about meetings with the same ambassador, and Trump publicly sided with Putin over U.S. intelligence in Helsinki.

Add years of Russian money flowing into Trump properties and a secret Trump Tower Moscow project during the campaign, and you don’t even need a pee tape to see the problem.

Mueller didn’t charge a criminal conspiracy, but he absolutely did not say "nothing happened."

Calling all of that "mostly fiction" or saying "stupid Dems" isn’t critical thinking; it’s closing your eyes to a specific, lengthy, well-documented foreign influence operation that our own intel community and a Republican-led Senate committee have already laid out in excruciating detail.


Ok. But the idea that Trump murdered a 13 year old girl’s baby with Epstein is about as dumb as the pee tapes.


Knowing everything that we now know now about Trump, what makes you sure that either of those scenarios are dumb?


Oh brother.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Russian influence operations, disinfo and psyops is a real and proven thing, operating on a significant scale, and targeting not only our elections but many others in Europe and Africa and other areas. The fact that Republicans don't even want to acknowledge it, let alone deal with it, and deflect with "Russia Russia Russia" is in and of itself a national security issue.


Everyone knows there are Russian psyops just like there are American psyops. The question is the crazed Russia “collusion” thing that obsessed the left and was mostly fiction (remember the “pee tapes”?). Trump is bad enough without making up dumb sh*t. If anything these fantasies are more likely actually planted and promoted by Russia to make Dems look stupid.


MAGA's “Russia hoax” narrative only survives by pretending the Steele dossier and a rumored pee tape are the whole story. They aren’t.

The FBI opened its investigation before even hearing about the Steele Dossier, after a Trump adviser bragged that Russia had “dirt” in the form of stolen emails. Trump’s team then held a “love it” meeting for “Russia and its government’s support,” his campaign chair with deep Russian ties shared internal polling with a suspected intel asset, Flynn lied about secret sanctions talks with the Russian ambassador, Sessions lied about meetings with the same ambassador, and Trump publicly sided with Putin over U.S. intelligence in Helsinki.

Add years of Russian money flowing into Trump properties and a secret Trump Tower Moscow project during the campaign, and you don’t even need a pee tape to see the problem.

Mueller didn’t charge a criminal conspiracy, but he absolutely did not say "nothing happened."

Calling all of that "mostly fiction" or saying "stupid Dems" isn’t critical thinking; it’s closing your eyes to a specific, lengthy, well-documented foreign influence operation that our own intel community and a Republican-led Senate committee have already laid out in excruciating detail.


Ok. But the idea that Trump murdered a 13 year old girl’s baby with Epstein is about as dumb as the pee tapes.




Why do you want to die on the hill of defending Trump who is clearly a sexual predator.
post reply Forum Index » Political Discussion
Message Quick Reply
Go to: