Epstein Files
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
I feel like MAGA will still support him no later how terrible the story. The President must be held to a much higher standard than Trump. He is truly appalling as are his supporters. |
Anonymous
Not defending Chump but that's an Indian website. In fact, all the sites that talk about this are tabloid sites, most from India. India is not quite known for reporting the truth nor is it a civilized country or a democracy. The previous statement is not racist. Do some research. Indians do coordinated attacks online and in person against anyone who uncovers truths about India(ns) that shines India(ns) in a negative light. The recent rioting against Bangladesh is the latest example. |
Anonymous
Redacted file from FBI https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet+8/EFTA00025010.pdf |
Anonymous
It’s on page 3 of the doc linked previously, not from a news article. |
Anonymous
That's a document from 2020 following up on an initial accusation from 2020 about an incident that occurred in 1984. 2020 was the Trump reelection campaign year where there was a lot of dirty politics going on. Where's the journalism reporting on this? Where's the followup? At this point, it's just hearsay and basically a hit piece. Unless there's an article that I missed not from India or a wacko christian "business news" site. Chump is not a good person. Neither are the other rich and powerful all-white people in the Epstein circle. But this accusation is sloppy and unprofessional, and if proven false, will only further the argument that "people" are out to get Chump. |
Anonymous
| See 14:56 above for redacted FBI file, page 3. |
Anonymous
Let's be e honest. You don't believe FBI file and if trump confirmed story you would still make excuses for him! |
Anonymous
Trump controlled the DPJ and FBI in 2020. What is your point? |
Anonymous
The point is that the story is salacious and potentially libelous without verified sources which can be found through journalistic investigation. Just the fact that a 13 year old gave natural birth and the delivery was performed by a bunch of old men sounds extremely dangerous and it's not like they dropped her off at the local ER. Perhaps there could be physical evidence of lasting skeletal damage that could be determined through an x-ray? Also, other facts that could be verified: - that Chump was on a plane to the middle of nowhere and back - Chump was in Michigan during the time period - the same Democrat Michigan governor (who doesn't like Chump) has been in office since 2019 so state police could have investigated - I mean, they could probably ask Michael Cohen to verify it, although his credibility is not the best Again. Not defending Chump. But people need to do some investigating instead of jumping to conclusions, which is exactly how you sink a case. |
Anonymous
Did you read the documents? |
Anonymous
| So close, shame they said 1984. It’s well documented that Trump met Epstein for the first time in 1987. Damn facts…. |
Anonymous
Here is a timeline of trump and Epstein https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-epstein-timeline-1.7604277 |
Anonymous
The document is a completely unsubstantiated report made to the FBI. |
Anonymous
NP. I read the redacted document that was posted a few pages back, and I personally don’t believe it. If I understood correctly, it was the report of a “tip” call to an FBI hotline, which means anyone can call and say anything. I’m familiar with the research on sexual assault reporting, and, while it’s much MUCH (much!) more likely that a real sexual assault doesn’t get reported than that a fake one gets reported, the latter does occasionally happen. And one of the biggest tells of a fake story is that there’s usually at least one detail that is over-the-top horrible and memorable. (Which is a depressing comment on how often accusations are shrugged off normally — the fake accusers know they probably won’t get much attention for the usual everyday type of sexual violence.) To me, this reads as the over-the-top kind of report that is often faked. I’m not saying extra-horrible details mean a fake by definition, but it does mean there’s more reason to be skeptical. |
Anonymous
Ok. The Russian influence thing was true, too. Thanks for the assist? |