Breaking: Debbie Wasserman-Schulz' IT staffer arrested while trying to flee US

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This whole thread has been a few wingnuts bumping it up with no substantive commentary, alternating with praise for "reporter" Luke Rosniak. It's almost touching. If you believe really hard, this will turn into a real story!

Contrary to your post, I think there are more than just “a few.”

I am one who has posted a couple comments here. I know there are others - and judging from the responses, I would say more than a few.
This is a curious story and the fact that you don’t think it’s “real” makes me laugh.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Planted Laptop?

http://dailycaller.com/2017/09/06/exclusive-did-imran-want-capitol-police-to-find-wasserman-schultzs-laptop/

Now that is a scoop! Nice work, Luke Rosiak!!!

The FBI needs this guy.

I believe there is someone inside the FBI or DOJ feeding Rosiak this after the coverup of the private server investigation coverup.

The truth should indeed be known.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This whole thread has been a few wingnuts bumping it up with no substantive commentary, alternating with praise for "reporter" Luke Rosniak. It's almost touching. If you believe really hard, this will turn into a real story!

If you don't think there is something fishy about this story, you are blessed with truly astounding naïveté.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Rep. Franks (AZ) spoke about this on Lou Dobbs tonight.

He is predicting something larger to come of this...

Popcorn time!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This whole thread has been a few wingnuts bumping it up with no substantive commentary, alternating with praise for "reporter" Luke Rosniak. It's almost touching. If you believe really hard, this will turn into a real story!

If there is nothing here, why you even opened this thread? Every time i see the next bogus thread opened about Trump, i simply ignore it. However, you bothered not only to read the comments, but also to read the linked article.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Rep. Franks (AZ) spoke about this on Lou Dobbs tonight.

He is predicting something larger to come of this...

Popcorn time!

Yep. “Fasten your seatbelts.”

[Anonymous]

I continue to be amazed at the lack of coverage on this story. Looks like the 4th Estate is circling the wagons until the evidence is irrefutable. With the FBI working the case and a DOJ that will focus on the law, not politics we will eventually know the truth. Who wants to bet that this story has a link to Wikileaks, Seth Rich and the Russian fake story of hacking?

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:I continue to be amazed at the lack of coverage on this story. Looks like the 4th Estate is circling the wagons until the evidence is irrefutable. With the FBI working the case and a DOJ that will focus on the law, not politics we will eventually know the truth. Who wants to bet that this story has a link to Wikileaks, Seth Rich and the Russian fake story of hacking?

I want to bet. Terms?

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I continue to be amazed at the lack of coverage on this story. Looks like the 4th Estate is circling the wagons until the evidence is irrefutable. With the FBI working the case and a DOJ that will focus on the law, not politics we will eventually know the truth. Who wants to bet that this story has a link to Wikileaks, Seth Rich and the Russian fake story of hacking?

I want to bet. Terms?

You go first...

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I continue to be amazed at the lack of coverage on this story. Looks like the 4th Estate is circling the wagons until the evidence is irrefutable. With the FBI working the case and a DOJ that will focus on the law, not politics we will eventually know the truth. Who wants to bet that this story has a link to Wikileaks, Seth Rich and the Russian fake story of hacking?

I want to bet. Terms?

DP. What do you mean by "terms"? Thanks.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I continue to be amazed at the lack of coverage on this story. Looks like the 4th Estate is circling the wagons until the evidence is irrefutable. With the FBI working the case and a DOJ that will focus on the law, not politics we will eventually know the truth. Who wants to bet that this story has a link to Wikileaks, Seth Rich and the Russian fake story of hacking?

I want to bet. Terms?

DP. May I suggest eating an edible cricket? If it was good enough for Princeton's Sam Wang wager Jake Tapper it should good enough for you two. I'd firm up up the details and limit it minimum of narrative for the win.

[Anonymous]

Jeff, you can delete my cricket suggestion if you want to.

[jsteele]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I continue to be amazed at the lack of coverage on this story. Looks like the 4th Estate is circling the wagons until the evidence is irrefutable. With the FBI working the case and a DOJ that will focus on the law, not politics we will eventually know the truth. Who wants to bet that this story has a link to Wikileaks, Seth Rich and the Russian fake story of hacking?

I want to bet. Terms?

DP. What do you mean by "terms"? Thanks.

What are we betting and what constitutes winning? I am willing to eat an edible cricket (per the suggestion) if this case turns out to have no connections to Wikileaks, Seth Rich, and the Russian hack of the DNC. Of course, the other person is going to have to make his/her identity known so we can make sure he/she eats the cricket when he/she loses the bet.

[Anonymous]

Definitely one, possibly 2 but prob just the one, pathetically goosing this thread every day.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I continue to be amazed at the lack of coverage on this story. Looks like the 4th Estate is circling the wagons until the evidence is irrefutable. With the FBI working the case and a DOJ that will focus on the law, not politics we will eventually know the truth. Who wants to bet that this story has a link to Wikileaks, Seth Rich and the Russian fake story of hacking?

I want to bet. Terms?

DP. What do you mean by "terms"? Thanks.

What are we betting and what constitutes winning? I am willing to eat an edible cricket (per the suggestion) if this case turns out to have no connections to Wikileaks, Seth Rich, and the Russian hack of the DNC. Of course, the other person is going to have to make his/her identity known so we can make sure he/she eats the cricket when he/she loses the bet.

I'm curious, Jeff. Do you still believe Awan is an innocent who was just going on vacation?