IRS Whistleblowers and Devon Archer - House Oversight

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10% for the big guy, bank records will corroborate the most corrupt political family in US history.
Trump was always right focusing on Hunter.

They looked at the bank records and the tax returns (which Joe has ALWAYS made public) and there is nothing nefarious. Are you suggesting super secret bank fraud as well?

Source for nothing nefarious?

The GOP would be screaming from the mountain tops with the piles of evidence...if they had it.

+1000

If they actually had evidence, there would be something more than all of this pantomime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:10% for the big guy, bank records will corroborate the most corrupt political family in US history.
Trump was always right focusing on Hunter.

Narrator: They already had the tax records and the bank records and nothing has been corroborated.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10% for the big guy, bank records will corroborate the most corrupt political family in US history.
Trump was always right focusing on Hunter.

Narrator: They already had the tax records and the bank records and nothing has been corroborated.

^ Lie. This corruption has been corroborated numerous times by numerous whistleblowers. You may keep ignoring the evidence, but most Americans are not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10% for the big guy, bank records will corroborate the most corrupt political family in US history.
Trump was always right focusing on Hunter.

Narrator: They already had the tax records and the bank records and nothing has been corroborated.

^ Lie. This corruption has been corroborated numerous times by numerous whistleblowers. You may keep ignoring the evidence, but most Americans are not.

Wrong. The facts of tracing money into accounts and whether that money was reported or withheld from the IRS would be facts. What these bozos, who are compromised themselves are saying are not reliable, as there isn't documentary evidence to back up their claims.

[Anonymous]

Uh you need to consider the sources in that NY Post article.

First, it is NY Post, owned by Rupert Murdoch.
Second, it is second hand information via Rudy Guiliani, who is no longer considered a credible player.
Third, it is coming from Shokin himself, who is/was trying to rehab his standing and was part of the corruption in Ukraine at the time.
Fourth, the article says "Trump claims...." - since when does anything Trump says is not a lie?

IOW, these are all people covering for themselves in manufacturing the whole Biden/Ukraine thing to begin with to deflect from Trump and his impeachment.



I believed the NYT and the WaPo when they said the laptop wasn't real. I trusted both papers more than NYPost. But the laptops were real. It took months for the papers to publish the truth. I have lost faith in both papers. They are so biased that they are failing to do proper investigative reporting. And I feel like it is continuing. Even if the Joe Biden and his family haven't violated any laws, they certainly have violated the spirit of the laws. They may not be as corrupt at Trump, but Joe Biden is not Obama, either.


Are you being serious? So where do you get your news now?


I still read the WaPo and NYTimes but added the Wall Street Journal. I also listen to NPR. I just try to remain aware of the bias of each publication and I don't f

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10% for the big guy, bank records will corroborate the most corrupt political family in US history.
Trump was always right focusing on Hunter.

They looked at the bank records and the tax returns (which Joe has ALWAYS made public) and there is nothing nefarious. Are you suggesting super secret bank fraud as well?

Yes, Yes, they knew how to obscure it through shell companies and international relationships. It is obvious Biden is corrupt, but proving it with direct evidence is difficult, but there is tons of circumstantial evidence showing what they were up to. And if you really believe Biden is completely innocent, you are checked out of reality.

I think Trump is guilty of some of the issues, and brought it on himself. But I still believe it is a targeted attack on him, especially in comparison to how they are trying to help Hunter and Pres. Biden get out of their issues.

[Anonymous]

Circumstantial evidence does not a court case nor impeachment make.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10% for the big guy, bank records will corroborate the most corrupt political family in US history.
Trump was always right focusing on Hunter.

They looked at the bank records and the tax returns (which Joe has ALWAYS made public) and there is nothing nefarious. Are you suggesting super secret bank fraud as well?

Yes, Yes, they knew how to obscure it through shell companies and international relationships. It is obvious Biden is corrupt, but proving it with direct evidence is difficult, but there is tons of circumstantial evidence showing what they were up to. And if you really believe Biden is completely innocent, you are checked out of reality.

I think Trump is guilty of some of the issues, and brought it on himself. But I still believe it is a targeted attack on him, especially in comparison to how they are trying to help Hunter and Pres. Biden get out of their issues.

You are divorced from reality with the bolded. Read the indictment and compare facts of cases by an actual prosecutor to the pile of BS being heaped at you by Fox News, who has hundreds of millions of pieces of paper in the form of dollars that show how little they hold things like "truth" in their reporting.

[Anonymous]

Speaking to Tucker - first part of interview posted. Time for more Trump indictments. HURRY.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:10% for the big guy, bank records will corroborate the most corrupt political family in US history.
Trump was always right focusing on Hunter.

They looked at the bank records and the tax returns (which Joe has ALWAYS made public) and there is nothing nefarious. Are you suggesting super secret bank fraud as well?

Source for nothing nefarious?

The GOP would be screaming from the mountain tops with the piles of evidence...if they had it.

They're already screaming from the mountain tops without any evidence of a crime related to Biden. It's all a distraction from the third and soon to be fourth indictment of TFG. They need to somehow justify in their minds that "both sides are the same" and won't ever be able to admit that they're backing a facist crook.

[Anonymous]

Meanwhilr Hunter Biden trashed $4.2million Venice Beach rental and stiffed owner with $80k in back rent.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12361815/Hunter-Biden-trashed-4-2million-Venice-Beach-rental-house-rude-entitled-wife-Melissa-leaving-property-disarray-disrepair-stiffing-owner-80-000-unpaid-rent.html?ito=native_share_article-nativemenubutton

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhilr Hunter Biden trashed $4.2million Venice Beach rental and stiffed owner with $80k in back rent.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12361815/Hunter-Biden-trashed-4-2million-Venice-Beach-rental-house-rude-entitled-wife-Melissa-leaving-property-disarray-disrepair-stiffing-owner-80-000-unpaid-rent.html?ito=native_share_article-nativemenubutton

Welp, I won't be voting for him, then.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhilr Hunter Biden trashed $4.2million Venice Beach rental and stiffed owner with $80k in back rent.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12361815/Hunter-Biden-trashed-4-2million-Venice-Beach-rental-house-rude-entitled-wife-Melissa-leaving-property-disarray-disrepair-stiffing-owner-80-000-unpaid-rent.html?ito=native_share_article-nativemenubutton

Welp, I won't be voting for him, then.

Same. He should be banned from public office! What a disgrace! I'm glad I won't be voting for him in the next election!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Meanwhilr Hunter Biden trashed $4.2million Venice Beach rental and stiffed owner with $80k in back rent.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12361815/Hunter-Biden-trashed-4-2million-Venice-Beach-rental-house-rude-entitled-wife-Melissa-leaving-property-disarray-disrepair-stiffing-owner-80-000-unpaid-rent.html?ito=native_share_article-nativemenubutton

Welp, I won't be voting for him, then.

Same. He should be banned from public office! What a disgrace! I'm glad I won't be voting for him in the next election!

I dunno, sounds like he stuck it to the wealthy California elites! Maybe he's not such a bad guy after all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Uh you need to consider the sources in that NY Post article.

First, it is NY Post, owned by Rupert Murdoch.
Second, it is second hand information via Rudy Guiliani, who is no longer considered a credible player.
Third, it is coming from Shokin himself, who is/was trying to rehab his standing and was part of the corruption in Ukraine at the time.
Fourth, the article says "Trump claims...." - since when does anything Trump says is not a lie?

IOW, these are all people covering for themselves in manufacturing the whole Biden/Ukraine thing to begin with to deflect from Trump and his impeachment.



I believed the NYT and the WaPo when they said the laptop wasn't real. I trusted both papers more than NYPost. But the laptops were real. It took months for the papers to publish the truth. I have lost faith in both papers. They are so biased that they are failing to do proper investigative reporting. And I feel like it is continuing. Even if the Joe Biden and his family haven't violated any laws, they certainly have violated the spirit of the laws. They may not be as corrupt at Trump, but Joe Biden is not Obama, either.


Are you being serious? So where do you get your news now?


I still read the WaPo and NYTimes but added the Wall Street Journal. I also listen to NPR. I just try to remain aware of the bias of each publication and I don't f

You’re SO intelligent and worldly. Are you married???