|
According to two former White House staffers, there is an entire team of tax-payer funded employees who have to reassemble and tape together all the documents Trump rips up. The Presidential Records Act requires the White House to preserve all documents the president handles. Trump doesn’t seem to care. He tears up documents when he is done with them and either throws them on the floor or in the trash. In order to comply with the law, the staff picks up all the pieces and hands them over to a team to tape them together again. This administration is getting crazier by the day. Can’t somebody just say, “Mr. President can you not rip that up?”
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/06/10/trump-papers-filing-system-635164 |
| Or, maybe, hold on to the original and make him a photocopy to tear up. Not the brightest thinkers. |
| Ever tried to break a habit? If you've been tearing up drafts for 50+ years, it might be tough to break the habit. |
That explains Trump’s current unlawful behavior. |
Yes, I doubt this is the most illegal habit he has. It's bizarre. |
Pot meet kettle. Trump is handed a document, scribbles notations on it and then tears it up. Yes, the report, letter or email can be reprinted, but the record is effectively lost. |
He’s a toddler. He can’t be left in a room alone. |
|
can't teach an old dog new tricks?
perhaps the old dog shouldn't have sought a new gig |
I get it now. He’s been breaking the law for 50 years and getting away with it, so we should look the other way as he continues to commit crimes. Including tearing up Presidental documents. It’s a crime. I do expect POTUS not to commit those, yes. |
|
We should all thank John Kelly for holding some semblance of a presidency together.
But not too loudly, because we don’t want John Kelly fired! Utter chaos would ensue. |
+1 If he can’t handle this simple thing... |
The whole world agrees with us.... |
|
Not surprising coming from President Pitch-a-fit.
|
| President Trump....the Best! |
Isn't it just as big a story that 2 civil servants with >20 years service were summarily fired and forced to say they resigned? And the only explanation given is "they serve at the pleasure of the President" (which is not legally justifiable).
|