Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
Not PP, but it’s unclear to me if Taylor’s PR people signed off. You would think so b/c why would Blake risk angering her further. At the same time, Blake also tried to insinuate that they had made amends back in February when Blake visited that horse farm near Taylor’s Rhode Island house and the article made sure to point that out. It’s honestly not clear to me how far Blake is willing to go. Another element is there’s press about problems with Travis. He supposedly blames Taylor for lack of focus and losing the superbowl. She won’t be as present at games next season, according to the tabloids. Taylor probably would rather have people talk about her soft reconciliation with blake than her relationship problems with Travis, so she may have approved sharing with the press that Blake had apologized and they’re talking again. |
Anonymous
|
America Ferreira has quietly removed her post supporting Blake off of Instagram. It was the one that the three other sisterhood of the traveling pants cast members had put immediately after the New York Times article came out.
Amber’s post is still up, but America’s is gone. |
Anonymous
DP. Absolutely none of the above is cited anywhere. Please stop posting things without credible citations. |
Anonymous
Everything I mentioned has been in the press. Google it before you make accusations. |
Anonymous
I'm the other PP (who thinks Blake's PR set this up and asked why they thought this was happening now). I thought their answer was helpful. This isn't something directly related to the lawsuit, just current tabloid gossip, so no citations needed. The Travis Kelce angle and using Blake as a diversion was a theory I hadn’t considered. |
Anonymous
| I read on Bluesky over the weekend that Baldoni told his wife when she announced that she was pregnant with a boy: “Baby, you get to be done!” Was he going to make her keep going until he got a boy? Wut. |
Anonymous
Lots of people do this, both men and women. Try for a third or even fourth to get that girl or boy. This is not a story. Funny that all Blake’s team has on Justin is toxic positivity and he wanted a boy, while Blake is grabbing crotches, making interns cry, getting people fired, making her kid say explicit lines. and shutting down donut shops. I’m sure they were hoping by now something more damning would’ve come out, but let’s not make things an issue that clearly aren’t. |
Anonymous
This is the smoking gun we’ve all been waiting for. You cracked the case. |
Anonymous
This is as silly as bringing up Blake's ancient history. |
Anonymous
It’s just a strange position for a supposedly feminist man to take. Babe, we’ve got to keep going until we have a son, and then you can stop. I guess for the brand he really needed to have a son around so he could “teach” him all those feminist principles he’s so good at and write his book for boys for him. Always be branding. |
Anonymous
It's possible that they both wanted a boy and this comment was not just about Justin getting what he wanted but more like "we both wanted a boy and a girl and now we have them which is great because I know pregnancy is tough on you." Like there is a much more benign read on that comment. BTW, I saw that as someone who support BL's lawsuit and thinks Baldoni is a fake feminist who got caught being his true self on the set of IEWU and is now facing a perfectly predictable comeuppance for it. I find him incredibly grating and think he did all this to himself by trying to brand himself as a feminist ally when he's actually really dumb about gender issues and not a feminist at all. But that doesn't mean I need to read nefarious intent into everything he does. That would make me no different than the PP above claiming that Lively "shut down a donut shop" when in reality JB stans who don't even live locally to the donut shop got it shut down by calling in health code violations over Blake briefly appearing in the shop with her hair down. That was a dumb PR stunt by Lively (and she should have worn a hair net), but she didn't get the shop shut down -- that was due to psycho JB supporters with literally nothing better to do than harass a small business because of it's minor affiliation with an actress they've decided is their sworn enemy because of their over-identification with an actor/director they'd never even heard of until like 4 months ago. |
Anonymous
I’m PP and that’s fair enough. It’s possible his wife really wanted a boy. Or, it could have been coming primarily from Justin. I don’t like him and immediately went for the negative interpretation, which perhaps isn’t totally fair of me. If it did come from him, though, I think it’s a fair criticism. |
Anonymous
| One of Lively’s companies filed a letter with the court noting that it will be seeking PO protections for third parties it has documents from, and suggests it will be having a bunch of meet and confers re doc designations. |
Anonymous
From what I understand, Justin isn’t a male feminist. His brand is about challenging toxic masculinity. That’s an oversimplification that Blake’s team is trying to push so they can trick people into thinking he’s gutting me too laws when really it’s Blake who’s doing that by abusing the law. She’s even trying to use SH privilege against Jed Wallace, who’s never even met her. This is a woman who twisted the facts to gain leverage and now is seeking to hide behind hard fought protections that were put in place for real victims of SH and SA facing powerful abusers. In this case, the alleged victim seems to be the one who has abused her power again and again. The courts will probably rule the CA law unconstitutional and it’ll be Lively’s fault. |
Anonymous
 What a monster! A husband joking with his wife that they were trying for a boy. Wow, just wow! lol
The crash out by these Lively and Reynolds bots is high comedy. |