Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Even if there are no “client lists” the justice department should release an accounting of how Epstein made his money, the footage of the video that leads to the conclusion it was suicide, etc. there has to be something info if he was charged in the first place.

There is tons of info they can release - way more than can fit on someone’s desk. More like an entire room full of files. That’s the point.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even if there are no “client lists” the justice department should release an accounting of how Epstein made his money, the footage of the video that leads to the conclusion it was suicide, etc. there has to be something info if he was charged in the first place.

There’s no footage of him killing himself because the cameras in his cell Block were not working. The video that was released was from a different cell block.

As the church lady says, “How Convenient “.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I wasn’t really paying attention to the Epstein saga until yesterday but OMG there are indeed tons of weird coincidences and red flags. If the files were not released under Biden and Trump that seems to me to indicate both Dems and GOP are tied up somehow? How can the NYT and WashPo have dropped this story so fast? There has to be something here. It just defies logic otherwise.

These have been veering MAGA and are now very much so. Read Apple News that includes Wired who broke the story that the White House released a doctored video from the prison.

Not to mention Bondi’s ridiculous claim that the video goes out for minutes every night. Mmmkay.

+1 The video doesn’t even show Epstein’s actual cell and someone still bothered to edit it.

Anyone who’s interested in this should be listening to Julie Brown of the Miami Herald who resurfaced this story in the first place years ago. She’s been DOJ g a lot of interviews.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Even if there are no “client lists” the justice department should release an accounting of how Epstein made his money, the footage of the video that leads to the conclusion it was suicide, etc. there has to be something info if he was charged in the first place.

There is tons of info they can release - way more than can fit on someone’s desk. More like an entire room full of files. That’s the point.

Ron Wyden is demanding this. https://www.finance.senate.gov/ranking-members-news/wyden-releases-new-information-on-financing-of-jeffrey-epsteins-operations-by-billionaire-leon-black-seeks-documents-from-trump-administration

Senator Wyden wrote: “In light of Attorney General Bondi’s recent claims that the Department of Justice intends to pursue accountability and transparency for those involved with Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking network, I write to request any documents in the possession of DOJ and the U.S. Treasury Department related to individuals, financial institutions, attorneys and agents that may have known about or facilitated the financing of Epstein's illegal activities.

[Anonymous]

Either there are no files, in which case Trump and QAnon lied about this for years or else there is a file and Trump is covering it up.

I can see why MAGA might be upset about this.

[Anonymous]

Steve Bannon became close with Epstein in
2017 while working in the Whitehouse and has some 14 hours of video interviews with Epstein which he doesn't want to release according to Michael Wolff.

[Anonymous]

The lawsuit, "Jane Doe v. Trump," alleging sexual assault by Donald Trump when the plaintiff was 13, was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Manhattan in 2016. While the initial lawsuit was dismissed, the refiled one pertained to the same claims of events occurring in 1994.

This lawsuit named Epstein and Trump as defendants. Whatever hsppto this lawsuit?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The lawsuit, "Jane Doe v. Trump," alleging sexual assault by Donald Trump when the plaintiff was 13, was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Manhattan in 2016. While the initial lawsuit was dismissed, the refiled one pertained to the same claims of events occurring in 1994.

This lawsuit named Epstein and Trump as defendants. Whatever hsppto this lawsuit?

Once was a procedural issue and once the plaintiff dropped it because she was receiving threats. She recently committed suicide.

[Anonymous]

Now MAGA is saying the democrats are the pedophiles because they want the Epstein files to be made public (ie who wants to see that stuff, the democrats)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now MAGA is saying the democrats are the pedophiles because they want the Epstein files to be made public (ie who wants to see that stuff, the democrats)

Geezus. No one wants to SEE that. We just want the NAMES of the criminals so we can shame and prosecute them. Lots of them are in public office with a duty to uphold the law and they need to lose their jobs and be indicted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Now MAGA is saying the democrats are the pedophiles because they want the Epstein files to be made public (ie who wants to see that stuff, the democrats)

You're purposely conflating paid Conservative Inc. prostitutes on social media and TV with MAGA. Those prostitutes do not speak for the MAGA base.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:^no one hesitated to throw Prince Andrew under the bus.

Because Andrew is an irrelevant nobody. Tabloid fodder.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to Whitney Webb, Epstein was not Mossad but Israeli Army intelligence. Then there were the connections with one of Israel's top spies Robert Maxwell. Lex Wexner, the Mega Groups co-founder, and arch-billionaire donor. If US attorney Acosta was told to lay off because Epstein was intelligence, that would mean the Feds knew of his operation and let it run on US soil.

I’m not a conspiracy theorist but this is the only explanation I’ve read that makes sense.

if you've read anything about Epstein he was not competent enough to be intelligence for anyone. people who met him found him very stupid.

Sure, sure because very stupid people rapidly amass $1b including $200m in real estate holdings in Paris, New York, Florida, New Mexico and the Virgin Islands plus private islands worth $86 million, private jets, $200m in hedge funds and private equity, and so on.

Well, the consensus was that he wasn't very rich, actually... he just was blackmailing Les Wexner. Anyone who ever talked to him about financial stuff found him extremely stupid and he never could back up what he said he had. Other than Les Wexner's nuts in a jar.

Well, Epstein's Manhattan townhouse is worth $77 million. Billionaire Stephen Deckoff bought Epstein's island for $60 million. Epstein owned multiple planes, including a Gulfstream G550 and a Boeing 727. The Gulfstream alone is worth around $60 million. And those are just well known physical assets.

I'd say the consensus is he was pretty rich. Particularly for a high school teacher from Coney Island.

The whole thing is incredibly mystifying.

I don't tend toward conspiracy theories, but regardless of how you identify politically, there is obviously a massive bi-partisan effort to shut down investigations into Epstein.

It's objectively fascinating. And appalling.

An elite prep school headmaster bumps into a college flunky in a book store and hires him on the spot to teach at his school? Sounds totally plausible.........

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:According to Whitney Webb, Epstein was not Mossad but Israeli Army intelligence. Then there were the connections with one of Israel's top spies Robert Maxwell. Lex Wexner, the Mega Groups co-founder, and arch-billionaire donor. If US attorney Acosta was told to lay off because Epstein was intelligence, that would mean the Feds knew of his operation and let it run on US soil.

I’m not a conspiracy theorist but this is the only explanation I’ve read that makes sense.

if you've read anything about Epstein he was not competent enough to be intelligence for anyone. people who met him found him very stupid.

Sure, sure because very stupid people rapidly amass $1b including $200m in real estate holdings in Paris, New York, Florida, New Mexico and the Virgin Islands plus private islands worth $86 million, private jets, $200m in hedge funds and private equity, and so on.

Well, the consensus was that he wasn't very rich, actually... he just was blackmailing Les Wexner. Anyone who ever talked to him about financial stuff found him extremely stupid and he never could back up what he said he had. Other than Les Wexner's nuts in a jar.

Well, Epstein's Manhattan townhouse is worth $77 million. Billionaire Stephen Deckoff bought Epstein's island for $60 million. Epstein owned multiple planes, including a Gulfstream G550 and a Boeing 727. The Gulfstream alone is worth around $60 million. And those are just well known physical assets.

I'd say the consensus is he was pretty rich. Particularly for a high school teacher from Coney Island.

The whole thing is incredibly mystifying.

I don't tend toward conspiracy theories, but regardless of how you identify politically, there is obviously a massive bi-partisan effort to shut down investigations into Epstein.

It's objectively fascinating. And appalling.

Louder for the people in the back. This isn't a partisan issue. This is a rich, powerful people issue.

[Anonymous]

The lawsuit, "Jane Doe v. Trump," alleging sexual assault by Donald Trump when the plaintiff was 13, was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Manhattan in 2016. While the initial lawsuit was dismissed, the refiled one pertained to the same claims of events occurring in 1994.

This lawsuit named Epstein and Trump as defendants. Whatever happened to this lawsuit?

The victim is tragically dead. One of her rapists is dead. The other should be joining Epstein soon.
https://www.scribd.com/document/630538434/4-Jane-Doe-vs-Trump-Epstein-2016-pdf#:~:text=Jane%20Doe%20filed%20a%20complaint,harm%20caused%20by%20the%20assaults.