What non political controversial position do you hold?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who spilt apart double stuff Oreos to make quadruple stuff are my hero!

Counterpoint: Original Oreos are the platonic ideal. Double stuff disrupts the proper cookie to filling ratio. What you are celebrating . . . well, that's an affront to God and man.

Original Oreos are gross.

Eloquently stated. About what I would expect from someone who prefers Double Stuff.

PP here, I prefer Double Stuff EL Fudge to regular EL Fudge as well.

Monster. The excess filling has addled your brain.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate the fat acceptance cult. It is equivalant to giving children a pack of Marlboroughs.

Do you like to advertise how stupid you are to the world? Posts like this are like neon signs that say “I’m scientifically illiterate!”

And genetically skinny.

It isn’t even that. It’s just someone who is overwhelmingly stupid. Sad.

It is not “overwhelmingly stupid” to state that being overweight has health consequences. It would be overwhelmingly stupid to ignore this fact about the human body. No one needs to be supermodel thin, but I agree that teaching children that being overweight is normal and has no consequences, is also not a good thing.

You can say that it’s unhealthy and they look beautiful though.

No one said anything about “beauty”.

NP. What do you think the body acceptance movement is?

I think it’s a movement that promotes people becoming and remaining unhealthy. Obviously, it’s a controversial view to some. But I would never encourage my child to eat nothing but junk food and live a sedentary life. Regardless of whether there’s a “movement” to make overweight people feel beautiful. Just like I’d never encourage them to smoke or do drugs or make any unhealthy decisions.

There is no movement advocating on a societal or individual level to eat junk food and live a sedentary life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who spilt apart double stuff Oreos to make quadruple stuff are my hero!

Counterpoint: Original Oreos are the platonic ideal. Double stuff disrupts the proper cookie to filling ratio. What you are celebrating . . . well, that's an affront to God and man.

Original Oreos are gross.

Eloquently stated. About what I would expect from someone who prefers Double Stuff.

PP here, I prefer Double Stuff EL Fudge to regular EL Fudge as well.

Monster. The excess filling has addled your brain.

Quadruple stuff EL Fudge will change your life!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who spilt apart double stuff Oreos to make quadruple stuff are my hero!

Counterpoint: Original Oreos are the platonic ideal. Double stuff disrupts the proper cookie to filling ratio. What you are celebrating . . . well, that's an affront to God and man.

Original Oreos are gross.

Eloquently stated. About what I would expect from someone who prefers Double Stuff.

PP here, I prefer Double Stuff EL Fudge to regular EL Fudge as well.

Monster. The excess filling has addled your brain.

Quadruple stuff EL Fudge will change your life!

Why do you hate America, PP?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A woman is a human person with a XX chromosome pair.

A man is a human person with a XY chromosome pair.

Apparently, this is a controversial position.

You are confusing sex with gender. Your sex is assigned at birth and is what is located between your legs. Gender is a social construct. It is in your brain. Many cultures throughout history have had 3,4, and even 5 different genders.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate the fat acceptance cult. It is equivalant to giving children a pack of Marlboroughs.

Do you like to advertise how stupid you are to the world? Posts like this are like neon signs that say “I’m scientifically illiterate!”

And genetically skinny.

It isn’t even that. It’s just someone who is overwhelmingly stupid. Sad.

It is not “overwhelmingly stupid” to state that being overweight has health consequences. It would be overwhelmingly stupid to ignore this fact about the human body. No one needs to be supermodel thin, but I agree that teaching children that being overweight is normal and has no consequences, is also not a good thing.

You can say that it’s unhealthy and they look beautiful though.

No one said anything about “beauty”.

NP. What do you think the body acceptance movement is?

I think it’s a movement that promotes people becoming and remaining unhealthy. Obviously, it’s a controversial view to some. But I would never encourage my child to eat nothing but junk food and live a sedentary life. Regardless of whether there’s a “movement” to make overweight people feel beautiful. Just like I’d never encourage them to smoke or do drugs or make any unhealthy decisions.

Gotcha. As I suspected, you are uninformed about what people are promoting when they encourage body acceptance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A woman is a human person with a XX chromosome pair.

A man is a human person with a XY chromosome pair.

Apparently, this is a controversial position.

You are confusing sex with gender. Your sex is assigned at birth and is what is located between your legs. Gender is a social construct. It is in your brain. Many cultures throughout history have had 3,4, and even 5 different genders.

So? How does this impact what defines a woman or a man?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A woman is a human person with a XX chromosome pair.

A man is a human person with a XY chromosome pair.

Apparently, this is a controversial position.

You are confusing sex with gender. Your sex is assigned at birth and is what is located between your legs. Gender is a social construct. It is in your brain. Many cultures throughout history have had 3,4, and even 5 different genders.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A woman is a human person with a XX chromosome pair.

A man is a human person with a XY chromosome pair.

Apparently, this is a controversial position.

You are confusing sex with gender. Your sex is assigned at birth and is what is located between your legs. Gender is a social construct. It is in your brain. Many cultures throughout history have had 3,4, and even 5 different genders.

Then we need to base bathrooms, sports, etc on sex and not gender. Clears up a lot of confusion.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A woman is a human person with a XX chromosome pair.

A man is a human person with a XY chromosome pair.

Apparently, this is a controversial position.

You are confusing sex with gender. Your sex is assigned at birth and is what is located between your legs. Gender is a social construct. It is in your brain. Many cultures throughout history have had 3,4, and even 5 different genders.

So? How does this impact what defines a woman or a man?

I kind of hope PP doesn’t take the time to respond to you since you are willfully missing the point. If you want to cling onto your uninformed idea of binary gender like Gollum held onto his ring, nobody can stop you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who spilt apart double stuff Oreos to make quadruple stuff are my hero!

Counterpoint: Original Oreos are the platonic ideal. Double stuff disrupts the proper cookie to filling ratio. What you are celebrating . . . well, that's an affront to God and man.

Original Oreos are gross.

Eloquently stated. About what I would expect from someone who prefers Double Stuff.

PP here, I prefer Double Stuff EL Fudge to regular EL Fudge as well.

Monster. The excess filling has addled your brain.

Quadruple stuff EL Fudge will change your life!

Why do you hate America, PP?

DP. Best conversation. 😂😂😂

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate the fat acceptance cult. It is equivalant to giving children a pack of Marlboroughs.

Do you like to advertise how stupid you are to the world? Posts like this are like neon signs that say “I’m scientifically illiterate!”

And genetically skinny.

It isn’t even that. It’s just someone who is overwhelmingly stupid. Sad.

It is not “overwhelmingly stupid” to state that being overweight has health consequences. It would be overwhelmingly stupid to ignore this fact about the human body. No one needs to be supermodel thin, but I agree that teaching children that being overweight is normal and has no consequences, is also not a good thing.

I don’t waste my time arguing with the scientifically illiterate, sorry. You are stupid. Sorry to tell you.

[Anonymous]

Pizza Hut should not make book recommendations

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hate the fat acceptance cult. It is equivalant to giving children a pack of Marlboroughs.

Do you like to advertise how stupid you are to the world? Posts like this are like neon signs that say “I’m scientifically illiterate!”

And genetically skinny.

It isn’t even that. It’s just someone who is overwhelmingly stupid. Sad.

It is not “overwhelmingly stupid” to state that being overweight has health consequences. It would be overwhelmingly stupid to ignore this fact about the human body. No one needs to be supermodel thin, but I agree that teaching children that being overweight is normal and has no consequences, is also not a good thing.

I don’t waste my time arguing with the scientifically illiterate, sorry. You are stupid. Sorry to tell you.

Pp was correct

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A woman is a human person with a XX chromosome pair.

A man is a human person with a XY chromosome pair.

Apparently, this is a controversial position.

You are confusing sex with gender. Your sex is assigned at birth and is what is located between your legs. Gender is a social construct. It is in your brain. Many cultures throughout history have had 3,4, and even 5 different genders.

Then we need to base bathrooms, sports, etc on sex and not gender. Clears up a lot of confusion.

Yes. Because some governments have passed legislation to change the legal definition of 'woman' to mean 'anyone who identifies as a woman.' So woman is now a subjective category based on feelings, self perception, and sex stereoptypes, and no longer a concrete subset of humans with a shared biology.