Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

Uh, are you forgetting he paid for sex with stormy daniels? He is not asexual.

Ok I don’t mean asexual. But I think that he gets off on the power and image. He has no need to creepily get off by coercing teens provided to him by a wealthier friend. There’s no power play there. If anything he wouldn’t want to act like he can’t get the girls on his own. All I am saying is that to the extent there’s something compromising in the files, it is that he was closer to Epstein and knew about his conduct than previously known. Clinton OTOH was totally doing it.

I just responded to your other post. You're a POS. And you're dead wrong in your blindness. Stop excusing our felon rapist.

I’m not sure how pointing out the psychological dynamics of rape vs sex for enjoyment may be different. You sound unhinged. It’s possible to actually have a discussion about these things.

You're unhinged and (again!) a POS for not condemning the felon in chief. Nobody wants your excuses about men and whether they enjoyed it or not. Whether they craved power or not. I'm not the only one calling you out for it. PP said you were excusing rapists. Sick.

Please point to where I excused Trump? You’re hallucinating.

[Anonymous]

Oops Trump admin didn’t redact enough of the damaging stuff and is now disappearing documents

Link: https://apnews.com/article/release-epstein-files-justice-department-trump-9290fcaad1cb6fcb1cbc1befabc01994

At least 16 files have disappeared from the DOJ webpage for documents related to Jeffrey Epstein

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

Uh, are you forgetting he paid for sex with stormy daniels? He is not asexual.

Ok I don’t mean asexual. But I think that he gets off on the power and image. He has no need to creepily get off by coercing teens provided to him by a wealthier friend. There’s no power play there. If anything he wouldn’t want to act like he can’t get the girls on his own. All I am saying is that to the extent there’s something compromising in the files, it is that he was closer to Epstein and knew about his conduct than previously known. Clinton OTOH was totally doing it.

I just responded to your other post. You're a POS. And you're dead wrong in your blindness. Stop excusing our felon rapist.

I’m not sure how pointing out the psychological dynamics of rape vs sex for enjoyment may be different. You sound unhinged. It’s possible to actually have a discussion about these things.

You're unhinged and (again!) a POS for not condemning the felon in chief. Nobody wants your excuses about men and whether they enjoyed it or not. Whether they craved power or not. I'm not the only one calling you out for it. PP said you were excusing rapists. Sick.

Please point to where I excused Trump? You’re hallucinating.

LOL. If you excused him you would just say it. But, you're doubling down on your decrepitude.

[Anonymous]

Did NOT excuse him... ^^

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

Uh, are you forgetting he paid for sex with stormy daniels? He is not asexual.

Ok I don’t mean asexual. But I think that he gets off on the power and image. He has no need to creepily get off by coercing teens provided to him by a wealthier friend. There’s no power play there. If anything he wouldn’t want to act like he can’t get the girls on his own. All I am saying is that to the extent there’s something compromising in the files, it is that he was closer to Epstein and knew about his conduct than previously known. Clinton OTOH was totally doing it.

I just responded to your other post. You're a POS. And you're dead wrong in your blindness. Stop excusing our felon rapist.

I’m not sure how pointing out the psychological dynamics of rape vs sex for enjoyment may be different. You sound unhinged. It’s possible to actually have a discussion about these things.

You're unhinged and (again!) a POS for not condemning the felon in chief. Nobody wants your excuses about men and whether they enjoyed it or not. Whether they craved power or not. I'm not the only one calling you out for it. PP said you were excusing rapists. Sick.

Please point to where I excused Trump? You’re hallucinating.

LOL. If you excused him you would just say it. But, you're doubling down on your decrepitude.

I’m not quite getting why me saying Trump is a rapist who gets off on the power differential vs being a creep motivated sexually is excusing Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Louis Freeh - Clinton’s head of the FBI needs to be investigated.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/dec/21/epstein-fbi-maria-farmer-annie-farmer

Look at this headline from 2019: Trump ally Alan Dershowitz and ex-FBI Director Louis Freeh are lobbying for an Israeli billionaire the US has accused of corruption

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/11/05/alan-dershowitz-ex-fbi-director-louis-freeh-lobbying-for-israeli-billionaire-dan-gertler.html

Someone has to look into Freeh. As FBI head he ignored a damning Epstein complaint that could have protected so many innocent victims. This isn’t a republican/democrat thing - there are villains on both sides.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Louis Freeh - Clinton’s head of the FBI needs to be investigated.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/dec/21/epstein-fbi-maria-farmer-annie-farmer

Look at this headline from 2019: Trump ally Alan Dershowitz and ex-FBI Director Louis Freeh are lobbying for an Israeli billionaire the US has accused of corruption

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/11/05/alan-dershowitz-ex-fbi-director-louis-freeh-lobbying-for-israeli-billionaire-dan-gertler.html

Someone has to look into Freeh. As FBI head he ignored a damning Epstein complaint that could have protected so many innocent victims. This isn’t a republican/democrat thing - there are villains on both sides.

And guess whose “independent” investigation cleared Dershowitz against Guiffrie’s claims? You guessed it Freeh.

https://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar/2016/04/lawyers-underage-sex-claims-against-dershowitz-a-mistake-221751

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

That is creepy AF. I hope they are some decent FBI agents out of the 1,00” that pushed back against the white washing of these files.

That’s his daughter at age 9. It’s a known photo. Don’t let facts ruin your fun though b

He was much younger when his daughter was 9.

He would have been 56 when she was 9. That looks like a 56 year old.

Trump was born in 1945 and Ivanka was born in 1981. He was 36 when Ivanka was born. If this is Ivanka when she was age 9 then Trump was 45 in this photo.

This information is easily available to anyone interested in absolute facts as opposed to your MAGA lying alternative facts!

You know he has another Daughter right? That information is easily available to anyone interested in absolute facts….

Trump virtually had nothing to do with Tiffany when she was young. Marla moved to CA to keep Tiffany away from publicity and probably Donald if, as has been reported, she knew about his pedophilia.

Ok, but you do know that’s a photo of him and Tiffany right?

Another easily refutable claim then, just produce the picture.

Boy, Trump sure works overime at looking guilty when he’s SO innocent.

It’s been posted here, keeps getting deleted. No surprise

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

Uh, are you forgetting he paid for sex with stormy daniels? He is not asexual.

As well As the Playboy bunny.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

Uh, are you forgetting he paid for sex with stormy daniels? He is not asexual.

Ok I don’t mean asexual. But I think that he gets off on the power and image. He has no need to creepily get off by coercing teens provided to him by a wealthier friend. There’s no power play there. If anything he wouldn’t want to act like he can’t get the girls on his own. All I am saying is that to the extent there’s something compromising in the files, it is that he was closer to Epstein and knew about his conduct than previously known. Clinton OTOH was totally doing it.

I just responded to your other post. You're a POS. And you're dead wrong in your blindness. Stop excusing our felon rapist.

I’m not sure how pointing out the psychological dynamics of rape vs sex for enjoyment may be different. You sound unhinged. It’s possible to actually have a discussion about these things.

You're unhinged and (again!) a POS for not condemning the felon in chief. Nobody wants your excuses about men and whether they enjoyed it or not. Whether they craved power or not. I'm not the only one calling you out for it. PP said you were excusing rapists. Sick.

Please point to where I excused Trump? You’re hallucinating.

LOL. If you excused him you would just say it. But, you're doubling down on your decrepitude.

I’m not quite getting why me saying Trump is a rapist who gets off on the power differential vs being a creep motivated sexually is excusing Trump.

Let me refresh your memory because you didn't say the felon was a rapist.

You said: "So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing."

That's an excuse. Not an accusation. Are you a third grader? I'm done with you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

That is creepy AF. I hope they are some decent FBI agents out of the 1,00” that pushed back against the white washing of these files.

That’s his daughter at age 9. It’s a known photo. Don’t let facts ruin your fun though b

He was much younger when his daughter was 9.

He would have been 56 when she was 9. That looks like a 56 year old.

Trump was born in 1945 and Ivanka was born in 1981. He was 36 when Ivanka was born. If this is Ivanka when she was age 9 then Trump was 45 in this photo.

This information is easily available to anyone interested in absolute facts as opposed to your MAGA lying alternative facts!

You know he has another Daughter right? That information is easily available to anyone interested in absolute facts….

Trump virtually had nothing to do with Tiffany when she was young. Marla moved to CA to keep Tiffany away from publicity and probably Donald if, as has been reported, she knew about his pedophilia.

Ok, but you do know that’s a photo of him and Tiffany right?

No. I don't know that this is a photo of Tiffany or if it is even a photo of Ivanka but there is an unredacted photo of Ivanka. Furthermore, you also don't know who the girl in the photo is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“He liked flicking and sucking her nipple until they were raw.”

Yup.

They are such incompetent LYING morons

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“He liked flicking and sucking her nipple until they were raw.”

Yup.

What legal justification is there for removing Trump's and Sergey Brin's names? They only need to redact victims.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

Uh, are you forgetting he paid for sex with stormy daniels? He is not asexual.

Ok I don’t mean asexual. But I think that he gets off on the power and image. He has no need to creepily get off by coercing teens provided to him by a wealthier friend. There’s no power play there. If anything he wouldn’t want to act like he can’t get the girls on his own. All I am saying is that to the extent there’s something compromising in the files, it is that he was closer to Epstein and knew about his conduct than previously known. Clinton OTOH was totally doing it.

I just responded to your other post. You're a POS. And you're dead wrong in your blindness. Stop excusing our felon rapist.

I’m not sure how pointing out the psychological dynamics of rape vs sex for enjoyment may be different. You sound unhinged. It’s possible to actually have a discussion about these things.

You're unhinged and (again!) a POS for not condemning the felon in chief. Nobody wants your excuses about men and whether they enjoyed it or not. Whether they craved power or not. I'm not the only one calling you out for it. PP said you were excusing rapists. Sick.

Please point to where I excused Trump? You’re hallucinating.

LOL. If you excused him you would just say it. But, you're doubling down on your decrepitude.

I’m not quite getting why me saying Trump is a rapist who gets off on the power differential vs being a creep motivated sexually is excusing Trump.

Let me refresh your memory because you didn't say the felon was a rapist.

You said: "So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing."

That's an excuse. Not an accusation. Are you a third grader? I'm done with you.

That’s saying that Trump is a rapist AND I don’t think there will be evidence of him with the Epstein victims, because I don’t think that was Trump’s MO. Not so sure why that is hard to understand.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“He liked flicking and sucking her nipple until they were raw.”

Yup.

What legal justification is there for removing Trump's and Sergey Brin's names? They only need to redact victims.

Or one of the recruiters, Natalya (Natalie) Malyshev?