Epstein Files

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

Uh, are you forgetting he paid for sex with stormy daniels? He is not asexual.

Ok I don’t mean asexual. But I think that he gets off on the power and image. He has no need to creepily get off by coercing teens provided to him by a wealthier friend. There’s no power play there. If anything he wouldn’t want to act like he can’t get the girls on his own. All I am saying is that to the extent there’s something compromising in the files, it is that he was closer to Epstein and knew about his conduct than previously known. Clinton OTOH was totally doing it.

I just responded to your other post. You're a POS. And you're dead wrong in your blindness. Stop excusing our felon rapist.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“He liked flicking and sucking her nipple until they were raw.”

Yup.

All of these people should be prosecuted, including Trump.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where’s the smoking gun? There doesn’t appear to be any credible evidence of additional crimes by anyone on the list.

Well they have released a small fraction of the docs and are clearly carefully scrubbing Trump from each and every one, which is a smoking gun in itself.

For a guy that keeps telling the lie that he innocent he sure does sled a a lot of time having his name removed…and that’s in addition to the thousands of hours we know the FBI spent scrubbing his name.

Think about that, they had 1,000 agents working on it, still have to go through each file now, and are STILL missing references to Trump that they have to remove after release.

I think that we can safely assume that every black bar is covering up Donald J Pedo Trump. The man could not be more guilty.

So no smoking gun for Trump, Clinton, etc.?

DCUM has turned into conspiracy theory central.

So you just doubled down on stupid?

If the Democrats could have charged Trump they would have.

If the Republicans could charge Clinton they would.

The world isn’t flat.

Birds are real.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where’s the smoking gun? There doesn’t appear to be any credible evidence of additional crimes by anyone on the list.

Well they have released a small fraction of the docs and are clearly carefully scrubbing Trump from each and every one, which is a smoking gun in itself.

For a guy that keeps telling the lie that he innocent he sure does sled a a lot of time having his name removed…and that’s in addition to the thousands of hours we know the FBI spent scrubbing his name.

Think about that, they had 1,000 agents working on it, still have to go through each file now, and are STILL missing references to Trump that they have to remove after release.

I think that we can safely assume that every black bar is covering up Donald J Pedo Trump. The man could not be more guilty.

So no smoking gun for Trump, Clinton, etc.?

DCUM has turned into conspiracy theory central.

So you just doubled down on stupid?

If the Democrats could have charged Trump they would have.

If the Republicans could charge Clinton they would.

The world isn’t flat.

Birds are real.

The DOJ was still investigating Maxwell and Trump on this matter. It wasnt "the democrats" - it was the justice system. Only a MAGA cult ember would think these things are political, because Trump has made them so.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

So it’s fine that he raped girls and women because he didn’t enjoy it?! You didn’t even read the post that he was obsessed with her nipples.

WTAF.

Rape is often a crime to assert power. I think you are missing my point entirely.

I don't think so, since you're still not condemning it. You basically said it was a nothing burger and brought up Clinton.

That’s not what I said at all but you don’t.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

Uh, are you forgetting he paid for sex with stormy daniels? He is not asexual.

Ok I don’t mean asexual. But I think that he gets off on the power and image. He has no need to creepily get off by coercing teens provided to him by a wealthier friend. There’s no power play there. If anything he wouldn’t want to act like he can’t get the girls on his own. All I am saying is that to the extent there’s something compromising in the files, it is that he was closer to Epstein and knew about his conduct than previously known. Clinton OTOH was totally doing it.

I just responded to your other post. You're a POS. And you're dead wrong in your blindness. Stop excusing our felon rapist.

I’m not sure how pointing out the psychological dynamics of rape vs sex for enjoyment may be different. You sound unhinged. It’s possible to actually have a discussion about these things.

[Anonymous]

They call it redaction,
It’s a redacting.
But we’re being very transparent,
From a standpoint of transparency.

I nevvah knew Jeffrey Epstein,
Barely knew him.

I barely knew him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Where’s the smoking gun? There doesn’t appear to be any credible evidence of additional crimes by anyone on the list.

Well they have released a small fraction of the docs and are clearly carefully scrubbing Trump from each and every one, which is a smoking gun in itself.

For a guy that keeps telling the lie that he innocent he sure does sled a a lot of time having his name removed…and that’s in addition to the thousands of hours we know the FBI spent scrubbing his name.

Think about that, they had 1,000 agents working on it, still have to go through each file now, and are STILL missing references to Trump that they have to remove after release.

I think that we can safely assume that every black bar is covering up Donald J Pedo Trump. The man could not be more guilty.

So no smoking gun for Trump, Clinton, etc.?

DCUM has turned into conspiracy theory central.

So you just doubled down on stupid?

If the Democrats could have charged Trump they would have.

If the Republicans could charge Clinton they would.

The world isn’t flat.

Birds are real.

The DOJ was still investigating Maxwell and Trump on this matter. It wasnt "the democrats" - it was the justice system. Only a MAGA cult ember would think these things are political, because Trump has made them so.

The blame MAGA defense mechanism is so tired.

Anyone that disagrees with you is “MAGA.”

It’s a symptom of groupthink and diminished intellectual functioning.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

That is creepy AF. I hope they are some decent FBI agents out of the 1,00” that pushed back against the white washing of these files.

That’s his daughter at age 9. It’s a known photo. Don’t let facts ruin your fun though b

He was much younger when his daughter was 9.

He would have been 56 when she was 9. That looks like a 56 year old.

Trump was born in 1945 and Ivanka was born in 1981. He was 36 when Ivanka was born. If this is Ivanka when she was age 9 then Trump was 45 in this photo.

This information is easily available to anyone interested in absolute facts as opposed to your MAGA lying alternative facts!

You know he has another Daughter right? That information is easily available to anyone interested in absolute facts….

Trump virtually had nothing to do with Tiffany when she was young. Marla moved to CA to keep Tiffany away from publicity and probably Donald if, as has been reported, she knew about his pedophilia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

Why do you want to make excuses for Trump? As you do not live in his head, this is all speculation. The old adage of if it walks like a duck and sounds like a duck so then it is a duck rings true here.

Don’t be an apologist for Trump

[Anonymous]

Louis Freeh - Clinton’s head of the FBI needs to be investigated.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/dec/21/epstein-fbi-maria-farmer-annie-farmer

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

That is creepy AF. I hope they are some decent FBI agents out of the 1,00” that pushed back against the white washing of these files.

That’s his daughter at age 9. It’s a known photo. Don’t let facts ruin your fun though b

He was much younger when his daughter was 9.

He would have been 56 when she was 9. That looks like a 56 year old.

Trump was born in 1945 and Ivanka was born in 1981. He was 36 when Ivanka was born. If this is Ivanka when she was age 9 then Trump was 45 in this photo.

This information is easily available to anyone interested in absolute facts as opposed to your MAGA lying alternative facts!

You know he has another Daughter right? That information is easily available to anyone interested in absolute facts….

Trump virtually had nothing to do with Tiffany when she was young. Marla moved to CA to keep Tiffany away from publicity and probably Donald if, as has been reported, she knew about his pedophilia.

Ok, but you do know that’s a photo of him and Tiffany right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Blanche: "There were a number of photos that were pulled down after being released. That's bc a judge in NY ordered us to listen to any victim if they have concerns... even though there's repeated attempts by Dems to paint President Trump as part of the Epstein saga, it's failing over & over again"


This is a lie. Judges orders in other cases do not apply to the DOJ release. Survivors knew the DoJ would use the courts as an excuse to protect Trump.

Also doesn’t explain why they pulled down docs with Trumps name in them and then reposted them with Trumps name redacted

Sure it does! Redact the names of thee victims and Trump is THE BIGGEST VICTIM! Duh!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

That is creepy AF. I hope they are some decent FBI agents out of the 1,00” that pushed back against the white washing of these files.

That’s his daughter at age 9. It’s a known photo. Don’t let facts ruin your fun though b

He was much younger when his daughter was 9.

He would have been 56 when she was 9. That looks like a 56 year old.

Trump was born in 1945 and Ivanka was born in 1981. He was 36 when Ivanka was born. If this is Ivanka when she was age 9 then Trump was 45 in this photo.

This information is easily available to anyone interested in absolute facts as opposed to your MAGA lying alternative facts!

You know he has another Daughter right? That information is easily available to anyone interested in absolute facts….

Trump virtually had nothing to do with Tiffany when she was young. Marla moved to CA to keep Tiffany away from publicity and probably Donald if, as has been reported, she knew about his pedophilia.

Ok, but you do know that’s a photo of him and Tiffany right?

Another easily refutable claim then, just produce the picture.

Boy, Trump sure works overime at looking guilty when he’s SO innocent.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Medias Touch reporting that Trump’s name was just redacted from part that talked about a girl (woman?) saying that Trump liked her pert nipples and goes on to talk about them.

This is beyond sick.

I have this weird belief that Trump is actually kind of asexual. He’s not a Bill Clinton who actually likes sex. Trump gets off on power and control, so he likes women as possessions. So while I fully expect that Trump would be in these files making crude comments (because he likes the power that gives him) I actually doubt it goes beyond that. The new news will be how much he knew about what Epstein was doing.

Uh, are you forgetting he paid for sex with stormy daniels? He is not asexual.

Ok I don’t mean asexual. But I think that he gets off on the power and image. He has no need to creepily get off by coercing teens provided to him by a wealthier friend. There’s no power play there. If anything he wouldn’t want to act like he can’t get the girls on his own. All I am saying is that to the extent there’s something compromising in the files, it is that he was closer to Epstein and knew about his conduct than previously known. Clinton OTOH was totally doing it.

I just responded to your other post. You're a POS. And you're dead wrong in your blindness. Stop excusing our felon rapist.

I’m not sure how pointing out the psychological dynamics of rape vs sex for enjoyment may be different. You sound unhinged. It’s possible to actually have a discussion about these things.

You're unhinged and (again!) a POS for not condemning the felon in chief. Nobody wants your excuses about men and whether they enjoyed it or not. Whether they craved power or not. I'm not the only one calling you out for it. PP said you were excusing rapists. Sick.