Great Falls Reston Soccer

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Why does how far other people are willing to drive for things such an issue for y'all? Somebody ask you to chip in on gas?


seriously. it's not like suddenly every kid at gfr is gonna be driving to bethesda. it'll be like 3-4 kids per age group MAX but it'll be a pathway which is apparently what is important to a lot of people.
Anonymous
How does anyone at this point not understand that a "pathway" is complete bogus marketing BS?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:How does anyone at this point not understand that a "pathway" is complete bogus marketing BS?


No clue but a bunch of people asked about it last night in the town hall.
Anonymous
Wow. Partnering with Bethesda would be galactically dumb.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Wow. Partnering with Bethesda would be galactically dumb.


Who would you recommend they partner with and why?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow. Partnering with Bethesda would be galactically dumb.


Who would you recommend they partner with and why?


Yeah, seems pretty synergistic to me when you think high school seasons, coach overlap, etc.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Wow. Partnering with Bethesda would be galactically dumb.


Also, isn’t the rumors say that Bethesda (and Arlington) are likely to switch over to GA to get their boys program in MLS Next?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow. Partnering with Bethesda would be galactically dumb.


Also, isn’t the rumors say that Bethesda (and Arlington) are likely to switch over to GA to get their boys program in MLS Next?


Bethesda is MLS for boys and ECNL for girls.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow. Partnering with Bethesda would be galactically dumb.


Also, isn’t the rumors say that Bethesda (and Arlington) are likely to switch over to GA to get their boys program in MLS Next?


Bethesda is MLS for boys and ECNL for girls.


Sorry doesn’t work that way.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow. Partnering with Bethesda would be galactically dumb.


Also, isn’t the rumors say that Bethesda (and Arlington) are likely to switch over to GA to get their boys program in MLS Next?


Bethesda is MLS for boys and ECNL for girls.


Thats the DCUM rumor.
Bethesda is grandfathered in
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow. Partnering with Bethesda would be galactically dumb.


Also, isn’t the rumors say that Bethesda (and Arlington) are likely to switch over to GA to get their boys program in MLS Next?


Bethesda is MLS for boys and ECNL for girls.


Sorry doesn’t work that way.


Did you check the website? Easy enough to fact check.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Wow. Partnering with Bethesda would be galactically dumb.


Also, isn’t the rumors say that Bethesda (and Arlington) are likely to switch over to GA to get their boys program in MLS Next?


Bethesda is MLS for boys and ECNL for girls.


Sorry doesn’t work that way.


That would be news to Bethesda.

https://www.bethesdasoccer.org/teams/mls-next/
https://www.bethesdasoccer.org/girls-teams/ecnl/


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:How does anyone at this point not understand that a "pathway" is complete bogus marketing BS?


So true. Unless it’s a direct pathway internal to the club or where the club is the major partner in an alliance, a “pathway” in an alliance just means you get to try out and go to a few practices. Of course everyone else has that same “pathway.” It’s just marketing. Did the NVA “alliance” actually help GFR or its players? Did anyone make a team they wouldn’t have made anyway by trying out at ID/practice sessions? Come on people, why so focused on this? If your DC is going to play RL, probably better to do so at a club where it’s the top team and not the second team. And if they’re good enough for NL/MLS, what’s stopping them?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:How does anyone at this point not understand that a "pathway" is complete bogus marketing BS?


So true. Unless it’s a direct pathway internal to the club or where the club is the major partner in an alliance, a “pathway” in an alliance just means you get to try out and go to a few practices. Of course everyone else has that same “pathway.” It’s just marketing. Did the NVA “alliance” actually help GFR or its players? Did anyone make a team they wouldn’t have made anyway by trying out at ID/practice sessions? Come on people, why so focused on this? If your DC is going to play RL, probably better to do so at a club where it’s the top team and not the second team. And if they’re good enough for NL/MLS, what’s stopping them?


Not all "pathways" are the same and we don't know anything about what GFR is working on (or with who), so let's pump the brakes a bit. Having a pathway just to say you have a pathway is, of course, marketing. But there are certainly benefits to having a well-defined alliance/pathway/relationship if done right. Joint trainings, tournament teams, secondary leagues, play-ups, etc. before U13 get coaches familiar with players and can give pathway players a leg up on equivalent competition from outside. Alliances also often have soft quotas for team spots from their member clubs. Alliances can also provide double-rostering options that would not be available for kids outside the alliance. And the lack of a pathway can't be used against GFR in recruiting upper end RL kids.
Anonymous
Is GFR going to announce this new pathway soon so that it takes place next fall? or is this still just conceptual and going to happen later?
post reply Forum Index » Soccer
Message Quick Reply
Go to: