2030 Girls Lacrosse

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Basing off of watching both teams play our team. BLC gave us more problems

What do you mean by more problems? Because they are so catty or something about lacrosse?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Basing off of watching both teams play our team. BLC gave us more problems

And your team would be?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Basing off of watching both teams play our team. BLC gave us more problems

And your team would be?

Guessing YJ parent since they beat coppermine in NGLL and lost to BLC. Weird season when BLC handily beats YJ and loses to CM who lost to YJ.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With hero’s and M&D picking up top talent will they be even more dominant in the next couple of years?

Hero's is like 7th in rankings, not sure I'd call them dominant.

I wouldn't call a team with 16 losses dominant. They did get better with the moves they made during tryouts. It will be interesting to see if BLC and Coppermine were able to make additions to get better.

Coppermine kept all its good players. Made some solid pickups to round out the team.

Rumor is Coppermine best player and BLC best player went to M&D and YJ best player went to HG. Is that true?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Basing off of watching both teams play our team. BLC gave us more problems

What do you mean by more problems? Because they are so catty or something about lacrosse?

You don’t know what that means? Seriously? Best both but one was harder to beat and pull away from

[Anonymous]

According to Rankings, BLC beat Coppermine in the fall, so it’s not crazy to think BLC is a bit better. BLC even ranked higher.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With hero’s and M&D picking up top talent will they be even more dominant in the next couple of years?

Hero's is like 7th in rankings, not sure I'd call them dominant.

I wouldn't call a team with 16 losses dominant. They did get better with the moves they made during tryouts. It will be interesting to see if BLC and Coppermine were able to make additions to get better.

Coppermine kept all its good players. Made some solid pickups to round out the team.

Where did solid pickups come from?

To me, locally, Tier 1 is M&D and MDU, then gap, Tier 2 HG & BLC, then gap Tier 3 Coppermine & YJMA

This statement is ridiculous. Coppermine went 2-1 against HG, and 2-1 against BLC. And somehow there's a gap in talent the other way?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With hero’s and M&D picking up top talent will they be even more dominant in the next couple of years?

Hero's is like 7th in rankings, not sure I'd call them dominant.

I wouldn't call a team with 16 losses dominant. They did get better with the moves they made during tryouts. It will be interesting to see if BLC and Coppermine were able to make additions to get better.

Coppermine kept all its good players. Made some solid pickups to round out the team.

Where did solid pickups come from?

To me, locally, Tier 1 is M&D and MDU, then gap, Tier 2 HG & BLC, then gap Tier 3 Coppermine & YJMA

This statement is ridiculous. Coppermine went 2-1 against HG, and 2-1 against BLC. And somehow there's a gap in talent the other way?

BLC parent here and I agree. Coppermine is a solid team and is absolutely in the same tier as HG/BLC.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With hero’s and M&D picking up top talent will they be even more dominant in the next couple of years?

Hero's is like 7th in rankings, not sure I'd call them dominant.

I wouldn't call a team with 16 losses dominant. They did get better with the moves they made during tryouts. It will be interesting to see if BLC and Coppermine were able to make additions to get better.

Coppermine kept all its good players. Made some solid pickups to round out the team.

Rumor is Coppermine best player and BLC best player went to M&D and YJ best player went to HG. Is that true?

I wouldn’t call any of these the best player but common denominator is they all took the draw and felt they were too good for their team and friends.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With hero’s and M&D picking up top talent will they be even more dominant in the next couple of years?

Hero's is like 7th in rankings, not sure I'd call them dominant.

I wouldn't call a team with 16 losses dominant. They did get better with the moves they made during tryouts. It will be interesting to see if BLC and Coppermine were able to make additions to get better.

Coppermine kept all its good players. Made some solid pickups to round out the team.

Rumor is Coppermine best player and BLC best player went to M&D and YJ best player went to HG. Is that true?

I wouldn’t call any of these the best player but common denominator is they all took the draw and felt they were too good for their team and friends.

😳

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With hero’s and M&D picking up top talent will they be even more dominant in the next couple of years?

Hero's is like 7th in rankings, not sure I'd call them dominant.

I wouldn't call a team with 16 losses dominant. They did get better with the moves they made during tryouts. It will be interesting to see if BLC and Coppermine were able to make additions to get better.

Coppermine kept all its good players. Made some solid pickups to round out the team.

Where did solid pickups come from?

To me, locally, Tier 1 is M&D and MDU, then gap, Tier 2 HG & BLC, then gap Tier 3 Coppermine & YJMA

This statement is ridiculous. Coppermine went 2-1 against HG, and 2-1 against BLC. And somehow there's a gap in talent the other way?

No one saying Coppermine isn’t a good team but yes, there’s a gap, which is why HG is ranked 7 and Coppermine 10, look at the common teams and scores. They aren’t in same tier as HG.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With hero’s and M&D picking up top talent will they be even more dominant in the next couple of years?

Hero's is like 7th in rankings, not sure I'd call them dominant.

I wouldn't call a team with 16 losses dominant. They did get better with the moves they made during tryouts. It will be interesting to see if BLC and Coppermine were able to make additions to get better.

Coppermine kept all its good players. Made some solid pickups to round out the team.

Where did solid pickups come from?

To me, locally, Tier 1 is M&D and MDU, then gap, Tier 2 HG & BLC, then gap Tier 3 Coppermine & YJMA

This statement is ridiculous. Coppermine went 2-1 against HG, and 2-1 against BLC. And somehow there's a gap in talent the other way?

No one saying Coppermine isn’t a good team but yes, there’s a gap, which is why HG is ranked 7 and Coppermine 10, look at the common teams and scores. They aren’t in same tier as HG.

9-20 in the rankings are an interesting group. On the right day, a lower ranked team could beat a higher ranked team.

IMO HG is marginally better than BLC. BLC is marginally better than CM, CM is marginally better than YJ.

Over the next couple of years the rankings could change for these teams in either direction. Will be fun to watch.

[Anonymous]

Wow. I wouldn’t call someone a “friend” if they don’t applaud and support their talented teammate for receiving and accepting an invitation from a top team.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With hero’s and M&D picking up top talent will they be even more dominant in the next couple of years?

Hero's is like 7th in rankings, not sure I'd call them dominant.

I wouldn't call a team with 16 losses dominant. They did get better with the moves they made during tryouts. It will be interesting to see if BLC and Coppermine were able to make additions to get better.

Coppermine kept all its good players. Made some solid pickups to round out the team.

Rumor is Coppermine best player and BLC best player went to M&D and YJ best player went to HG. Is that true?

I wouldn’t call any of these the best player but common denominator is they all took the draw and felt they were too good for their team and friends.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Wow. I wouldn’t call someone a “friend” if they don’t applaud and support their talented teammate for receiving and accepting an invitation from a top team.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:With hero’s and M&D picking up top talent will they be even more dominant in the next couple of years?

Hero's is like 7th in rankings, not sure I'd call them dominant.

I wouldn't call a team with 16 losses dominant. They did get better with the moves they made during tryouts. It will be interesting to see if BLC and Coppermine were able to make additions to get better.

Coppermine kept all its good players. Made some solid pickups to round out the team.

Rumor is Coppermine best player and BLC best player went to M&D and YJ best player went to HG. Is that true?

I wouldn’t call any of these the best player but common denominator is they all took the draw and felt they were too good for their team and friends.

I’m sure many do, but it can be challenging depending on how your “friend” explains their departure and the complaints their parents have expressed about their “friends” not being good enough to play with them.

[Anonymous]

https://awardsforanything.com/product/participation-academic-wrapped-medal/