The Trump Women and their Fashion Mishaps - Part Three

[Anonymous]

We missed this one!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have fewer under eye wrinkles than that and I am 75.
She must be a natural blonde with sun damage in her youth. I have my Gallego dad's thick creamy white skin. When I got facials in my 40s they said I had "good skin" and I didn't know what they meant. Now I do. But I do have lines around my mouth.

For God's sake, no you do not.

If any of us had a close up taken in light as harsh as that and then the photographer adjusted the photo to emphasize those lines then yes, we'd all look like this. Even at 30 or 35.

+1
The photo was *very deliberately* set up and taken. And then, of course, published.

Why would she allow that?

Because she is lacking in knowledge.

Also not his fault she has needle holes in her face.

Here’s the thing with LEAVITT’s photo. He focused on her lips because she is Trump’s mouthpiece. I can’t believe no one here has made that connection yet. How clueless are you people?

Nice try defending a man who denigrated pregnant woman. Are you a guy or just a woman who hate other women?

This administration doesn't care about pregnant women.

Why should we?

Nice of you to hold an internet stranger to higher standards than you hold the POTUS.

I don't know who do you mean under "this administration", it is always action of one person. The person above justified the man treating pregnant woman poorly. Why should you care or not depends on your own values, believes and upbringing. Anyone who support this photographer hates women. There is no higher standard in respecting a woman for a fact that she is a woman, especially when she is pregnant. This is a basic common sense.

Your post makes no sense. Is your argument that women are immune from criticism when they are pregnant? If so, that’s crazy. I’ve been pregnant four times and never expected that treatment. Your post is so insane I think you are a troll just trying to stir up crap.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We missed this one!

That’s not Ivanka is it? If so that is the worst picture I’ve ever seen of her. Either it’s just a terrible picture for some reason or she should fire whoever does her injenctkons — she doesn’t look like her usual pretty self here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We missed this one!

That’s not Ivanka is it? If so that is the worst picture I’ve ever seen of her. Either it’s just a terrible picture for some reason or she should fire whoever does her injenctkons — she doesn’t look like her usual pretty self here.

Apparently it is when she attended parliament in Israel this past October.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/lifestyle/article-15409795/amp/ivanka-trump-casual-jeans-minimal-makeup-aspen-outing.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Who is this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Who is this?

Ivanka

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have fewer under eye wrinkles than that and I am 75.
She must be a natural blonde with sun damage in her youth. I have my Gallego dad's thick creamy white skin. When I got facials in my 40s they said I had "good skin" and I didn't know what they meant. Now I do. But I do have lines around my mouth.

For God's sake, no you do not.

If any of us had a close up taken in light as harsh as that and then the photographer adjusted the photo to emphasize those lines then yes, we'd all look like this. Even at 30 or 35.

+1
The photo was *very deliberately* set up and taken. And then, of course, published.

Why would she allow that?

Because she is lacking in knowledge.

Also not his fault she has needle holes in her face.

Here’s the thing with LEAVITT’s photo. He focused on her lips because she is Trump’s mouthpiece. I can’t believe no one here has made that connection yet. How clueless are you people?

Nice try defending a man who denigrated pregnant woman. Are you a guy or just a woman who hate other women?

I doubt she was pregnant when the photo was taken. And if she was, he didn’t know. Furthermore, if she was pregnant at the time of the photo, she shouldn’t be getting crap injected into her body.

I totally agree with the mouthpiece interpretation.

She has been visibly pregnant for the last two months, and she already knows the gender of the baby, so not newly pregnant. He surely knew she was pregnant back when he took photo.

The Vanity Fair photo shoot was in mid November. Why would she tell a journalist that she was pregnant then?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why does pregnant excuse injection holes?

+1 If anything it shows she’s dumb for getting janky lol injections while she’s pregnant when most women don’t even eat soft cheese.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have fewer under eye wrinkles than that and I am 75.
She must be a natural blonde with sun damage in her youth. I have my Gallego dad's thick creamy white skin. When I got facials in my 40s they said I had "good skin" and I didn't know what they meant. Now I do. But I do have lines around my mouth.

For God's sake, no you do not.

If any of us had a close up taken in light as harsh as that and then the photographer adjusted the photo to emphasize those lines then yes, we'd all look like this. Even at 30 or 35.

+1
The photo was *very deliberately* set up and taken. And then, of course, published.

Why would she allow that?

Because she is lacking in knowledge.

Also not his fault she has needle holes in her face.

Here’s the thing with LEAVITT’s photo. He focused on her lips because she is Trump’s mouthpiece. I can’t believe no one here has made that connection yet. How clueless are you people?

Nice try defending a man who denigrated pregnant woman. Are you a guy or just a woman who hate other women?

I doubt she was pregnant when the photo was taken. And if she was, he didn’t know. Furthermore, if she was pregnant at the time of the photo, she shouldn’t be getting crap injected into her body.

I totally agree with the mouthpiece interpretation.

She has been visibly pregnant for the last two months, and she already knows the gender of the baby, so not newly pregnant. He surely knew she was pregnant back when he took photo.

The Vanity Fair photo shoot was in mid November. Why would she tell a journalist that she was pregnant then?

You are the second person I have seen say this. What is the source for that? I just don't believe that's true (not accusing you of lying but clearly if you and another person are saying it, the claim is coming from somewhere). They were able to go from photoshoot to entire article spread in a month? I was under the impression that these things took closer to 2-3 months.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:We missed this one!

That’s not Ivanka is it? If so that is the worst picture I’ve ever seen of her. Either it’s just a terrible picture for some reason or she should fire whoever does her injenctkons — she doesn’t look like her usual pretty self here.

Looks just like her mother here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Who is this?

Ivanka

Really? Pic looks too fat to be ivanka. I thought she liposuctioned all the fat out.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Who is this?

Ivanka

Really? Pic looks too fat to be ivanka. I thought she liposuctioned all the fat out.

It’s called aging. I’m no fan of any of them but leave a woman’s looks alone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why does pregnant excuse injection holes?

+1 If anything it shows she’s dumb for getting janky lol injections while she’s pregnant when most women don’t even eat soft cheese.

This is what I’m wondering. Can one (should one?) get filler while pregnant? Back when I was expecting a hundred years ago, filler wasn’t really a thing so o honestly don’t know.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have fewer under eye wrinkles than that and I am 75.
She must be a natural blonde with sun damage in her youth. I have my Gallego dad's thick creamy white skin. When I got facials in my 40s they said I had "good skin" and I didn't know what they meant. Now I do. But I do have lines around my mouth.

For God's sake, no you do not.

If any of us had a close up taken in light as harsh as that and then the photographer adjusted the photo to emphasize those lines then yes, we'd all look like this. Even at 30 or 35.

+1
The photo was *very deliberately* set up and taken. And then, of course, published.

Why would she allow that?

Because she is lacking in knowledge.

Also not his fault she has needle holes in her face.

Here’s the thing with LEAVITT’s photo. He focused on her lips because she is Trump’s mouthpiece. I can’t believe no one here has made that connection yet. How clueless are you people?

Nice try defending a man who denigrated pregnant woman. Are you a guy or just a woman who hate other women?

Why does it matter that she’s pregnant? She’s more delicate? What kind of a misogynistic freak are you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Tucking a sweatshirt into the jeans. Bold strategy, cotton.